skip to main content
10.1145/22627.22340acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

The information lens: an intelligent system for information sharing in organizations

Published:01 April 1986Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes an intelligent system to help people share and filter information communicated by computer-based messaging systems. The system exploits concepts from artificial intelligence such as frames, production rules, and inheritance networks, but it avoids the unsolved problems of natural language understanding by providing users with a rich set of semi-structured message templates. A consistent set of “direct manipulation” editors simplifies the use of the system by individuals, and an incremental enhancement path simplifies the adoption of the system by groups.

One of the key problems that arises when any group of people cooperates to solve problems or make decisions is how to share information. Thus one of the central goals of designing good “organizational interfaces” (Malone, 1985) should be to help people share information in groups and organizations. In this paper, we will describe a prototype system, called the Information Lens, that focuses on one aspect of this problem: how to help people share the many diverse kinds of qualitative information that are communicated via electronic messaging systems.

It is already a common experience in mature computer-based messaging communities for people to feel flooded with large quantities of electronic “junk mail” (Denning, 1982; Palme, 1984; Wilson, 1984; Hiltz & Turoff, 1985), and the widespread availability of inexpensive communication capability has the potential to overwhelm people with even more messages that are of little or no value to them. At the same time, it is also a common experience for people to be ignorant of facts that would facilitate their work and that are known elsewhere in their organization. The system we will describe helps solve both these problems: it helps people filter, sort, and prioritize messages that are already addressed to them, and it also helps them find useful messages they would not otherwise have received.

The most common previous approach to structuring information sharing in electronic messaging environments is to let users implicitly specify their general areas of interest by associating themselves with centralized distribution lists or conference topics related to particular subjects (e.g., Hiltz & Turoff, 1978). Since these methods of disseminating information are often targeted for relatively large audiences, however, it is usually impossible for all the information distributed to be of interest to all recipients.

The Information Lens system uses much more detailed representations of message contents and receivers' interests to provide more sophisticated filtering possibilities. One of the key ideas behind this system is that many of the unsolved problems of natural language understanding can be avoided by using semi-structured templates (or frames) for different types of messages. These templates are used by the senders of messages to facilitate composing messages in the first place. Then, the same templates are used by the receivers of messages to facilitate constructing a set of rules to be used for filtering and categorizing messages of different types.

References

  1. Blair, D. and Maron, M. An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system. Communications of the ACM, 28, 3, 1985. pp. 289-299. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Brobst, S. A., Malone, T. W., Grant, K. R., & Cohen, M. D., Toward intelligent message routing systems. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Computer Message Systems, Washington, D. C., September 5- 7, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Crawford, A. Corporate electronic mail - A communication intensive application of information technology. MIS Quarterly, September 1982, pp. 1-14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Denning, P. Electronic junk. Communications of the ACM, 23, 3, 1982. pp. 163-165. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Englebart, D.C. and English, W.K. Research center for augmenting human intellect. Proceedings of FaU Joint Computing Congress, AFIPS press, December 1968, pp. 395-410.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Fikes, R. and Kehler, T. The role of frame-based representation in reasoning. Communications of the ACM, 28, 7, 1985, p. 904. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hiltz, S.R. and Turoff, M. The network nation: human communication via computer. Reading, Mass." Addison-Wesley, 1978. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hiltz, S.R. and Turoff, M. Structuring computermediated communication systems to avoid information overload. Communications of the ACM, 28, 7,1985, pp.680-689. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Johansen, R. Teleconferencing and beyond: Communications in the office of the future. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kedzierski, B. Knowledge-based project management and communication support in a system development environment. Fourth Jerusalem Conference on Information Technology. Jerusalem, Israel, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Malone, T. Designing organizational interfaces. Proceedings of the CHI '85 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. San Francisco, California, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Palme, J. You have 134 unread mail do you want to read them now? IFIP Conference on Computer Based Message Services. Nottingham University, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Salton, G. and McGill, M. Introduction to modern information retrieval. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Sarin, S.K. and Greif, I. Interactive on-line conferences. Proceedings A CM-SIGOA Conference on Office Information Systems, June 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Searle, J. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts in K. Gunderson (ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Language. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Shneiderman, B. The future of interactive systems and the emergence of direct manipulation." Behavior and Information Technology, 1,237-256,1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Shneiderman, B. Direct manipulation: A step beyond programming languages." {EEE Computer, 16, 57-69, August 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Stallman, R. ZMai} manual. M.I.T. Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Stefik, M., Foster, G., Bobrow, D., Kahn, K., Lanning, S. and Suchman, L. Beyond the chalkboard: using computers to support collaboration and problem solving in meetings. Intelligent Systems Laboratory Technical Report, Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, Palo Alto, CA, September, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Tou, F.N., Williams, M.D., Fikes, R.E., Henderson, D.A., & Malone, T.W. RABBIT: An intelligent daytabase assistant. Proceedings of the National Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, August 18-20, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Trigg, R. Network approach to text handling for the online scientific community. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland, CSTR- 1346, November 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Turoff, M. Information, value and the internal marketplace. New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Wilson, P., Maude, T., Marshall, C., and Heaton, N. The active mailbox- your on-line secretary. {FIP Conference on Computer Based Message Services. Nottingham University, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The information lens: an intelligent system for information sharing in organizations

                        Recommendations

                        Comments

                        Login options

                        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                        Sign in
                        • Published in

                          cover image ACM Conferences
                          CHI '86: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
                          April 1986
                          362 pages
                          ISBN:0897911806
                          DOI:10.1145/22627

                          Copyright © 1986 ACM

                          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                          Publisher

                          Association for Computing Machinery

                          New York, NY, United States

                          Publication History

                          • Published: 1 April 1986

                          Permissions

                          Request permissions about this article.

                          Request Permissions

                          Check for updates

                          Qualifiers

                          • Article

                          Acceptance Rates

                          CHI '86 Paper Acceptance Rate47of122submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

                        PDF Format

                        View or Download as a PDF file.

                        PDF

                        eReader

                        View online with eReader.

                        eReader