ABSTRACT
Research in sustainable HCI has repeatedly pointed to the need for encouraging longer use of technology as part of the solution for stemming the tide of e-waste. Ways of achieving this goal remain elusive, however. We build upon previous research that considers the role of personal attachment in object ownership, and how this attachment might be leveraged to encourage longer use. We conducted a personal inventories study with 17 households in Switzerland, and use the findings to support and expand Odom et al.'s framework of attachment categories. We subsequently provided this framework to 3 designers and asked them to design novel technologies that encourage attachment. This exercise shed light on how they drew insight and inspiration from the framework, and how they integrated it into their design processes and design thinking.
- Arroyo, E., Bonanni, L., and Selker, T. Waterbot: exploring feedback and persuasive techniques at the sink. In Proc. CHI 2005, 631--639. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Blevis, E. Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse, In Proc. CHI 2007, 503--512. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Blevis, E. and Stolterman, E. Ensoulment and sustainable interaction design. In Proc. IASDR 2007.Google Scholar
- Chetty, M., Brush, A. J., Meyers, B. R., and Johns, P. It's not easy being green: understanding home computer power management. In Proc. CHI 2009, 1033--1042. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chetty, M., Tran, D., and Grinter, R. E. Getting to green: understanding resource consumption in the home. In Proc. UbiComp 2008, 242--251. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cooper, T. Durable consumption: reflections on product life cycles and the throwaway society. In Hertwich, E. (ed.) Proc. of Lifecycle Approaches to Sustainable Consumption Workshop. 11--27.Google Scholar
- DiSalvo, C., Sengers, P., and Brynjarsdóttir, H. Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI. In Proc. CHI 2010, 1975--1984. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Jr., and Borning, A. Value sensitive design and information systems. In P. Zhang and D. Galletta (eds.), Human-computer interaction in management information systems: Foundations, 348--372.Google Scholar
- Froehlich, J., Dillahunt, T., Klasnja, P., Mankoff, J., Consolvo, S., Harrison, B., and Landay, J. UbiGreen: investigating a mobile tool for tracking and supporting green transportation habits. In Proc. CHI 2009, 1043--1052. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gaver, B., Dunne, T., and Pacenti, E. Design: cultural probes. interactions 6, 1 (1999), 21--29. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hanks, K., Odom, W., Roedl, D., and Blevis, E. Sustainable millennials: attitudes towards sustainability and the material effects of interactive technologies. In Proc. CHI 2009, 333--342. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Huang, E. M. and Truong, K. N. Breaking the disposable technology paradigm: opportunities for sustainable interaction design for mobile phones. In Proc. CHI 2008, 323--332. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Huang, E. M., Yatani, K., Truong, K. N., Kientz, J. A., and Patel, S. N. Understanding mobile phone situated sustainability: the influence of local constraints and practices on transferability. Pervasive Computing 8, 1 (2008), 46--53. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Huh, J., Nam, K., and Sharma, N. Finding the lost treasure: understanding reuse of used computing devices. In Proc. CHI 2010, 1875--1878. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kim, S. and Paulos, E. Practices in the creative reuse of e-waste. In Proc. CHI 2011, 2395--2404. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kuznetsov, S., Davis, G. N., Paulos, E., Gross, M. D., and Cheung, J. C. Red balloon, green balloon, sensors in the sky. In Proc. UbiComp 2011, 237--246. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Odom, W., Pierce, J., Stolterman, E., and Blevis, E. Understanding why we preserve some things and discard others in the context of interaction design. In Proc. CHI 2009, 1053--1062. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pierce, J. and Paulos, E. Second-hand interactions: Investigating reacquisition and dispossession practices around domestic objects. In Proc. CHI 2011, 2385--2394. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Voida, A. and Mynatt, E. D. Conveying user values between families and designers. In Proc. CHI 2005, 2013--2016. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Woodruff, A., Hasbrouck, J., and Augustin, S. A bright green perspective on sustainable choices. In Proc. CHI 2008, 313--322. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Woolley, M. Choreographing obsolescence - ecodesign: the pleasure/dissatisfaction cycle. In Proc DPPI 2003, 77--81. Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
Understanding why we preserve some things and discard others in the context of interaction design
CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThis paper takes up the problem of understanding why we preserve some things passionately and discard others without thought. We briefly report on the theoretical literature relating to this question, both in terms of existing literature in HCI, as well ...
Bridging the Theory-Practice Gap: Lessons and Challenges of Applying the Attachment Framework for Sustainable HCI Design
CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsDespite significant progress in sustainable HCI towards theoretical frameworks to guide design, there is a gap between theory and practice, so that the impact of such frameworks is limited. As an initial exploration in bridging the theory-practice gap, ...
Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse
CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThis paper presents the perspective that sustainability can and should be a central focus of interaction design-a perspective that is termed Sustainable Interaction Design (SID). As a starting point for a perspective of sustainability, design is defined ...
Comments