skip to main content
10.1145/2361276.2361304acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicerConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A statewide survey on computing education pathways and influences: factors in broadening participation in computing

Published:09 September 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In computing education, we have only just started developing methods for accurately measuring a student's understanding of introductory computing, let alone characterizing a whole classroom, school, or university system. As part of evaluating the impact of "Georgia Computes!" we sought an understanding the factors influencing undergraduate enrollment in introductory computing for an entire state in the United States of America. We gathered surveys from over 1400 undergraduate students in introductory computing classes from 19 higher-education institutions in a single state. The analysis provided insight into the impact of "Georgia Computes!", into the connections between stages of the computing education pathways, and how factors that influence students' pursuit of computing differ between genders and majority/minority group students.

References

  1. W. R. Adrion, R. Fall, M. Matos, and A. R. Peterfreund. Integrating evaluation into program development: benefits of baselining a nsf-bpc alliance. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, SIGCSE '10, pages 27--31, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Baron and D. Kenny. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social pyschological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51:1173--1182, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. S. Beyer. The accuracy of academic gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 40:787--813, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. S. Beyer, M. Chavez, and K. Rynes. Gender differences in attitudes toward confidence in computer science. In The annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Beyer, K. Rynes, J. Perrault, K. Hay, and S. Haller. Gender differences in computer science students. In The 34th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 49--53, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Bruckman, M. Biggers, B. Ericson, T. McKlin, J. Dimond, B. DiSalvo, M. Hewner, L. Ni, and S. Yardi. "georgia computes!": improving the computing education pipeline. In Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, SIGCSE '09, pages 86--90, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. M. Cohoon and K. M. Baylor. Female graduate students and program quality. IEEE Technology and Society, 22(3):28--35, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. B. Ericson, M. Guzdial, and M. Biggers. Improving secondary cs education: progress and problems. In Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, SIGCSE '07, pages 298--301, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. P. Kinnunen and B. Simon. Cs majors' self-efficacy perceptions in cs1: results in light of social cognitive theory. In Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research, ICER '11, pages 19--26, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Margolis, R. Estrella, J. Goode, J. J. Holme, and K. Nao. Stuck in the Shallow End: Education, Race, and Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. C. Strenta, R. Elliott, R. Adair, M. Matier, and J. Scott. Choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions. Research in Higher Education, 35(5):513--547, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A. E. Tew, C. Fowler, and M. Guzdial. Tracking an innovation in introductory cs education from a research university to a two-year college. In Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, SIGCSE '05, pages 416--420, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. E. Tew and M. Guzdial. Developing a validated assessment of fundamental cs1 concepts. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, SIGCSE '10, pages 97--101, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. E. Tew and M. Guzdial. The fcs1: a language independent assessment of cs1 knowledge. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, SIGCSE '11, pages 111--116, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. Yardi and A. Bruckman. What is computing?: bridging the gap between teenagers' perceptions and graduate students' experiences. In Proceedings of the third international workshop on Computing education research, ICER '07, pages 39--50, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A statewide survey on computing education pathways and influences: factors in broadening participation in computing

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ICER '12: Proceedings of the ninth annual international conference on International computing education research
        September 2012
        174 pages
        ISBN:9781450316040
        DOI:10.1145/2361276

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 9 September 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate189of803submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        ICER 2024
        ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
        August 13 - 15, 2024
        Melbourne , VIC , Australia

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader