skip to main content
10.1145/2380116.2380131acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

GamiCAD: a gamified tutorial system for first time autocad users

Published:07 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present GamiCAD, a gamified in-product, interactive tutorial system for first time AutoCAD users. We introduce a software event driven finite state machine to model a user's progress through a tutorial, which allows the system to provide real-time feedback and recognize success and failures. GamiCAD provides extensive real-time visual and audio feedback that has not been explored before in the context of software tutorials. We perform an empirical evaluation of GamiCAD, comparing it to an equivalent in-product tutorial system without the gamified components. In an evaluation, users using the gamified system reported higher subjective engagement levels and performed a set of testing tasks faster with a higher completion ratio.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

paper_0452-file3.mp4

mp4

44.1 MB

References

  1. Andersen, E., Liu, Y., Snider, R., Szeto, R., and Popovi , Z. (2011). Placing a value on aesthetics in online casual games. ACM CHI, 1275--1278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bergman, L., Castelli, V., Lau, T., and Oblinger, D. (2005). DocWizards: a system for authoring follow-me documentation wizards. ACM UIST. 191--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., and Newell, A. (1983). The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction, CRC Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Carroll, J. M., and Rosson, M. B. (1987). Paradox of the active user. Interfacing Thought Cognitive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction. MIT Press, 80--111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Carroll, J. M. (1990). The Nurnberg Funnel: Designing Minimalist Instruction for Practical Computer Skill. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chen, H., Wigand, R.T. and Nilan, M.S. (1999). Optimal experience of web activities. Computers in human behavior. 15(5), 585--608.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, R.E. (1983) Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 4, 445--459.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. Optimal Experi-ence: Psychological Studies of Flow in Conscious-ness.15--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O'Hara, K., and Dixon, D. (2011). CHI 2011 Workshop Gamification: Using Game Design Elements in Non-Game Contexts. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Deterding, S., and Dixon, D. (2011). From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness : Defining " Gamification. ACM MindTrek. 9--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 1Dix, A., Finlay, J. E., Abowd, G. D. and Beale, R. (2003). Human Computer Interaction. Prentice-Hall. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Dong, T., Dontcheva, M.., Joseph, D., and Karahalios, K., Newman, M. W., Acherman, M. S., (2012). Discov-ery-based Games for Learning Software, ACM CHI. 2083--2086. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Dreyfus, S. E., and Dreyfus, H. L. A Five-Stage Model of the Mental Activities Involved In Directed Skill Ac-quisition. Technical report, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Fernquist, J., Grossman, T. and Fitzmaurice, G. (2011) Sketch-sketch revolution: an engaging tutorial system for guided sketching and application learning. ACM UIST. 373--382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Flatla, D., Gutwin, C., Nacke, L., Bateman, S. and Re-Mandryk, R. (2011) Calibration games: making calibra-tion tasks enjoyable by adding motivating game ele-ments. ACM UIST. 403--412. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Fiore, A.T., Tiernan, S.L., Smith, M.A. (2002). Observed behavior and perceived value of authors in usenet newsgroups: bridging the gap. ACM CHI, 323--330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Grabler, F., Agrawala, M., Li, W., Dontcheva, M. and Igarashi, T. (2009). Generating photo manipulation tutorials by demonstration. ACM SIGGRAPH. 28(3):66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Gee, J.P. (2003) What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Grossman, T., Fitzmaurice, G. (2010) ToolClips: an investigation of contextual video assistance for func-tionality understanding. ACM CHI. 1515--1524. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Grossman, T., Fitzmaurice, G. and Attar, R. (2009) A survey of software learnability: metrics, methodologies and guidelines. ACM CHI. 649--658. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 2Harel, D. (1987). A Visual Formalism for Complex Systems. Science of Computer Programming , 231--274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 2Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., Zubek, R. (2004) MDA: A Formal Approach to Game Design and Game Research. Proc.AAAI04 WS on Challenges in Game AI, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Inbar, O., Tractinsky, N., Tsimhoni, O. and Seder, T. (2011) Driving the Scoreboard: Motivating Eco-Driving Through In-Car Gaming, CHI Gamification Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Kelleher, C. and Pausch, R. (2005). Stencils-based tuto-rials: design and evaluation. ACM CHI. 541--550. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Linehan, C., Kirman, B., Lawson, S., and Chan, G. (2011). Practical, appropriate, empirically-validated guidelines for designing educational games. ACM CHI. 1979--1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Mack, R. L., Lewis, C. H., and Carroll, J. M. (1983). Learning to use word processors: problems and pro-spects. ACM Trans Inf Syst. 1, 254--271. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. McGrenere, J., and Moore, G. (2000). Are We All In the Same "Bloat"? ACM GI, 187--196.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Malone, T. (1981) Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction. Cognitive Science, 4, 333--370.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Malone, T. W. (1982). Heuristics for designing enjoya-ble user interfaces: Lessons from computer games. ACM CHI. 63--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. 3O'Neil, H.F., Wainess, R. and Baker, E.L. (2005). Clas-sification of Learning outcomes: evidence from the computer games literature. The Curriculum Journal, 16. 455--474.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. 3Palmiter, S. and Elkerton, J. (1991). An evaluation of animated demonstrations of learning computer-based tasks. ACM CHI. 257--263. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. 3Pongnumkul, S., Dontcheva, M., Li, W., Wang, J., Bourdev, L., Avidan, S. and Cohen, M. F. Pause-and-play: automatically linking screencast video tutorials with applications. ACM UIST. 135--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Game-Based Learning. McGraw-Hill. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Ramesh, V., Hsu, C., Agrawala, M. and Hartmann, B. (2011) ShowMeHow: translating user interface instruc-tions between applications. ACM UIST. 127--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Reeves, B. and Read, J.L. (2009). Total Engagement: Using Games and Virtual Worlds to Change the Way People Work and Businesses Compete. Harvard Busi-ness School Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. 3Rosas, R., Nussbaum, M., Cumsille, P., Marianov, V. etc. (2003) Beyond Nintendo: design and assessment of educational video games for first and second grade stu-dents. Computers & Education, 40 71--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. 3Shneiderman, B. (2004). Designing for fun: how can we design user interfaces to be more fun?.Interactions 11, 5, 48--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. 3Singh V, Twidale MB, and Rathi D. (2006). Open Source Technical Support: A Look at Peer Help-Giving. IEEE HICSS, 6, 118c. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Sweetser, P., and Wyeth, P. (2005). GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. Computer Entertainment, 3, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. 4Tuck, R. and Olsen, D. R. (1990). Help by Guided Tasks: Utilizing UIMS Knowledge. ACM CHI. 71--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. 4Von Ahn, L. and Dabbish, L. (2008). Designing games with a purpose. Communications Of ACM 51, 8, 58--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Zichermann, G. and Linder, J. (2010). Game-Based Marketing: Inspire Customer Loyalty Through Re-wards, Challenges, and Contests. Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. GamiCAD: a gamified tutorial system for first time autocad users

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UIST '12: Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
      October 2012
      608 pages
      ISBN:9781450315807
      DOI:10.1145/2380116

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 October 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

      Upcoming Conference

      UIST '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader