skip to main content
10.1145/2380116.2380156acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

High-performance pen + touch modality interactions: a real-time strategy game eSports context

Published:07 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

We used the situated context of real-time strategy (RTS) games to address the design and evaluation of new pen + touch interaction techniques. RTS play is a popular genre of Electronic Sports (eSports), games played and spectated at an extremely high level. Interaction techniques are critical for eSports players, because they so directly impact performance.

Through this process, new techniques and implications for pen + touch and bi-manual interaction emerged. We enhance non-dominant hand (NDH) interaction with edge-constrained affordances, anchored to physical features of interactive sur- faces, effectively increasing target width. We develop bi-manual overloading, an approach to reduce the total number of occurrences of NDH retargeting. The novel isosceles lasso select technique facilitates selection of complex object subsets. Pen-in-hand interaction, dominant hand touch interaction performed with the pen stowed in the palm, also emerged as an efficient and expressive interaction paradigm.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

paper_0205-file3.mp4

mp4

67.9 MB

References

  1. Appert, C., Chapuis, O., Beaudouin-Lafon, M. Evaluation of pointing performance on screen edges. Proc. AVI (2008), 119--126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Balakrishnan, R., MacKenzie, I. S. Performance differences in the fingers, wrist, and forearm in computer input control. Proc. CHI (1997). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brandl, P., Forlines, C., Wigdor, D., Haller, M., Shen, C. Combining and measuring the benefits of bimanual pen and direct-touch interaction on horizontal interfaces. Proc. AVI (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cheung, G., Huang, J. Starcraft from the stands: Understanding the game spectator. Proc. CHI (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cutler, L. D., Fröhlich, B., Hanrahan, P. Two-handed direct manipulation on the responsive workbench. Proc. I3D (1997). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Damaraju, S., Kerne, A. Comparing multi-touch interaction techniques for manipulation of an abstract parameter space. Proc. ICMI (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Froehlich, J., Wobbrock, J. O., Kane, S. K. Barrier pointing: using physical edges to assist target acquisition on mobile device touch screens. Proc. SIGACCESS (2007), 19--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gibson, J. J. The ecological approach to visual perception. Psychology Press, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Guiard, Y. Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: The kinematic chain as a model. J. Motor Behavior 19 (1987).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hinckley, K., Guimbretiere, F., Baudisch, P., Sarin, R., Agrawala, M., Cutrell, E. The springboard: Multiple modes in one spring-loaded control. Proc. CHI (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hinckley, K., Pausch, R., Proffitt, D., Patten, J., Kassell, N. Cooperative bimanual action. Proc. CHI (1997), 27--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hinckley, K., Yatani, K., Pahud, M., Coddington, N., Rodenhouse, J., Wilson, A., Benko, H., Buxton, B. Manual deskterity: An exploration of simultaneous pen + touch direct input. CHI EA (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hinckley, K., Yatani, K., Pahud, M., Coddington, N., Rodenhouse, J., Wilson, A., Benko, H., Buxton, B. Pen + touch = new tools. Proc. UIST (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kabbash, P., MacKenzie, I. S., Buxton, W. Human performance using computer input devices in the preferred and non-preferred hands. Proc. CHI (1993), 474--481. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kaltenbrunner, M., Bovermann, T., Bencina, R., Costanza, E. TUIO: A protocol for table-top tangible user interfaces. Proc. 6th Int'l Gesture Workshop (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kurtenbach, G., Buxton, W. The limits of expert performance using hierarchic marking menus. Proc. CHI (1993), 482--487. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. League of Legends. {PC}. Riot Games, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Moeller, J., Kerne, A. ZeroTouch: An optical multi-touch and free-air interaction architecture. Proc. CHI (2012), Full paper in press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Norman, D. A. The Design of Everyday Things. Basic Books, September 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Odell, D. L., Davis, R. C., Smith, A., Wright, P. K. Toolglasses, marking menus, and hotkeys: a comparison of one and two-handed command selection techniques. Proc. GI (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Plott, S. Day{9} Daily #242 Secrets of Hotkeys, APM, and Mouse Movement, February 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Salen, K., Zimmerman, E. Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Spring Engine. {open source}, 2004. http://springrts.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. StarCraft II. {OSX}. Blizzard Entertainment, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Todor, J. I., Doane, T. Handedness and hemispheric asymmetry in the control of movements. J Mot Behav 10, 4 (Dec. 1978), 295--300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Wills, G. J. Selection: 524,288 ways to say "this is interesting". Proc. INFOVIS (1996). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Wobbrock, J. O., Morris, M. R., Wilson, A. D. User-defined gestures for surface computing. Proc. CHI (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Zabramski, S. Careless touch: a comparative evaluation of mouse, pen, and touch input in shape tracing task. Proc. OzCHI (2011), 329--332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Zero-K. {open source}, 2010. http://zero-k.info/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. High-performance pen + touch modality interactions: a real-time strategy game eSports context

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UIST '12: Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
      October 2012
      608 pages
      ISBN:9781450315807
      DOI:10.1145/2380116

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 October 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

      Upcoming Conference

      UIST '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader