skip to main content
10.1145/2384916.2384946acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

"So that's what you see": building understanding with personalized simulations of colour vision deficiency

Published:22 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Colour vision deficiencies (CVD) affect the everyday lives of a large number of people, but it is difficult for others - even friends and family members - to understand the experience of having CVD. Simulation tools can help provide this experience; however, current simulations are based on general models that have several limitations, and therefore cannot accurately reflect the perceptual capabilities of most individuals with reduced colour vision. To address this problem, we have developed a new simulation approach that is based on a specific empirical model of the actual colour perception abilities of a person with CVD. The resulting simulation is therefore a more exact representation of what a particular person with CVD actually sees. We tested the new approach in two ways. First, we compared its accuracy with that of the existing models, and found that the personalized simulations were significantly more accurate than the old method. Second, we asked pairs of participants (one with CVD, and one close friend or family member without CVD) to discuss images of everyday scenes that had been simulated with the CVD person's particular model. We found that the personalized simulations provided new insights into the details of the CVD person's experience. The personalized-simulation approach shows great promise for improving understanding of CVD (and potentially other conditions) for people with ordinary perceptual abilities.

References

  1. Birch, J. Diagnosis of Defective Colour Vision, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Birch, J. Extreme Anomalous Trichromatism. In Mollon, Pokorny, Knoblauch, eds., Normal and Defective Colour Vision, Oxford Press, 2003, 364--369.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Brettel, H., Vienot, F., Mollon, J. Computerized Simulation of Color Appearance for Dichromats. Journal of the Optical Society of America A., 14(10), 1997, 2647--2655.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Cole, B. The Handicap of Abnormal Colour Vision. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 87(4-5), 2004, 258--275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Dougherty, R., Wade, A. Vischeck. www.vischeck.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Davies, I.R.L, Laws, G., Corbett, G.G., Jerret, D.J Cross-Cultural Differences in Colour Vision: Acquired "Colour-Blindness" in Africa, Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 1988, 1153--1162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Flatla, D.R., Gutwin, C. Improving Calibration Time and Accuracy for Situation-Specific Models of Color Differentiation. Proc. ASSETS 2011, 195--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Flatla, D.R., Gutwin, C. Individual Models of Color Differentiation to Improve Interpretability of Information Visualization. Proc. CHI 2010, 2563--2572. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hailpern, J., Danilevsky, M., Harris, A., Karahalios, K., Dell, G., Hengst, J. ACES: Promoting Empathy Towards Aphasia Through Language Distortion Emulation Software. Proc. CHI 2011, 609--618. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hardy, L.H., Rand, G., Rittler, M.C. H-R-R Polychromatic Plates. J. Optical Society America, 44, 1954, 509--521.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Heer, J., Stone, M. Color Naming Models for Color Selection, Image Editing and Palette Design. Proc. CHI 2012, 1007--1016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kondo, S. A Computer Simulation of Anomalous Color Vision. In Ohta, ed., Color Vision Deficiencies IX, Kugler & Ghedini, 1990, 145--159.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lomax, R., Ridgway, P. Meldrum, M. Does Occupational Exposure to Organic Solvents Affect Colour Discrimination? Toxicological Reviews, 23(2), 2004, 92--121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Machado, G., Oliveira, M., Fernandes, L. A Physiologically-based Model for Simulation of Color Vision Deficiency. IEEE TVCG, 15(6), 2009, 1291--1298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. MacAdam, D. Visual Sensitivities to Color Differences in Daylight. J. Optical Soc. of America, 32(5), 1942, 247--274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Meyer, G., Greenburg, D. Color-Defective Vision and Computer Graphics Displays. IEEE CGA, 8(5), 1988, 28--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mollon, J.D., Astell, S., Reffin, J.P. A Minimalist Test of Colour Vision. In Drum, Moreland, Serra, eds., Colour Vision Deficiencies X, Kluwer Academic Publ., 1991, 59--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Neitz J., Jacobs, G. Polymorphism of the Long-Wavelength Cone in Normal Human Colour Vision. Nature, 323, 1986, 623--625.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Poirson, A.B., Wandell, B.A. The Ellipsoidal Representation of Spectral Sensitivity. Vision Res., 30(4), 1990, 647--652.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Spalding, J.A.B. Colour Blind Artists: Do the Vischeck Transformations Work? Clinical and Experimental Optometry, May, 2010, 188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Steward, J.M., Cole, B.L. What Do Color Vision Defectives Say About Everyday Tasks? Optometry and Vision Science, 66(5), 1989, 288--295.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Stone, M. A Field Guide to Digital Color. A.K. Peters, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Vienot, F., Brettel, H., Mollon, J. Digital Video Colourmaps for Checking t he Legibility o f Displays by Dichromats. Color Research and Application, 24(4), 1999, 243--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Vienot, F., Brettel, H., Ott, L., Ben M'Barek, A., Mollon, J. What Do Colour-Blind People See? Nature, 376, 1995, 127--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Wandell, B. Foundations of Vision. Sinauer, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Wyszecki, G., Stiles, W. Color Science: Concepts, Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulas, 2nd ed. Wiley, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Yates, J.T., Diamantopoulos, I., Daumann, F.J. Acquired (Transient and Permanent) Colour Vision Disorders. In Operational Colour Vision in the Modern Aviation Environment, NATO Technical Report 16, 2001, 43--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. "So that's what you see": building understanding with personalized simulations of colour vision deficiency

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ASSETS '12: Proceedings of the 14th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
        October 2012
        321 pages
        ISBN:9781450313216
        DOI:10.1145/2384916

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 October 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader