skip to main content
10.1145/2390116.2390125acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Stylometric relevance-feedback towards a hybrid book recommendation algorithm

Published:29 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Reading is an important activity for individuals. Content-based recommendation systems are, typically, used to recommend scientific papers or news, where search is driven by topic. Literary reading or reading for leisure differs from scientific reading, because users search books not only for their topic but also by author or writing style. Choosing a new book to read can be tricky and recommendation systems can make it easy by selecting books that the user will like. In this paper we study recommendation through writing style and the influence of negative examples in user preferences. Our experiments were conducted in a hybrid set-up that combines a collaborative filtering algorithm with stylometric relevance feedback. Using the LitRec data set, we demonstrate that writing style influences book selection; that book content, characterized with writing style, can be used to improve collaborative filtering results; and that negative examples do not improve final predictions.

References

  1. G. Adomavicius and A. Tuzhilin. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 17(6):734--749, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Balabanović and Y. Shoham. Fab: content-based, collaborative recommendation. Commun. ACM, 40(3):66--72, Mar. 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. Blei, A. Ng, and M. Jordan. Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 3:993--1022, Mar. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. R. Burke. Hybrid web recommender systems. In P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa, and W. Nejdl, editors, The adaptive web, pages 377--408. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. B. Chikhaoui, M. Chiazzaro, and S. Wang. An improved hybrid recommender system by combining predictions. In Proc. of the 2011 IEEE WS of International Conf. on Advanced Information Networking and App., WAINA '11, pages 644--649, Washington, DC, USA, 2011. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Gunawardana and C. Meek. A unified approach to building hybrid recommender systems. In Proc. of the third ACM conference on Recommender systems, RecSys '09, pages 117--124, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Kamps. The impact of author ranking in a library catalogue. In Proc. of the 4th ACM workshop on Online books, complementary social media and crowdsourcing, BooksOnline '11, pages 35--40, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Lee, P. Choi, and Y. Woo. A hybrid recommender system combining collaborative filtering with neural network. In Proc. of the Second International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, AH '02, pages 531--534, London, UK, UK, 2002. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Q. Li and B. Kim. An approach for combining content-based and collaborative filters. In Proc. of the sixth international workshop on Information retrieval with Asian languages - Volume 11, AsianIR '03, pages 17--24, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2003. Association for Computational Linguistics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. P. Lops, M. Gemmis, and G. Semeraro. Content-based recommender systems: State of the art and trends. In F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira, and P. B. Kantor, editors, Recommender Systems Handbook, pages 73--105. Springer US, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. R. Mooney and L. Roy. Content-based book recommending using learning for text categorization. In Proc. of the fifth ACM conference on Digital libraries, DL '00, pages 195--204, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Pazzani. A framework for collaborative, content-based and demographic filtering. Artif. Intell. Rev., 13(5--6):393--408, Dec. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Rocchio. Relevance Feedback in Information Retrieval, pages 313--323. Prentice-Hall, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. B. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web, WWW '01, pages 285--295, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Y. Seroussi, I. Zukerman, and F. Bohnert. Authorship attribution with latent dirichlet allocation. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, CoNLL '11, pages 181--189, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2011. Association for Computational Linguistics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. E. Stamatatos. A survey of modern authorship attribution methods. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 60(3):538--556, Mar. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. X. Su and T. Khoshgoftaar. A survey of collaborative filtering techniques. Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 2009:1--20, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. Utiyama and M. Yamamoto. Relevance feedback models for recommendation. In Proc. of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP '06, pages 449--456, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2006. Association for Computational Linguistics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. P. C. Vaz, D. M. de Matos, B. Martins, and P. Calado. Improving a hybrid literary book recommendation system through author ranking. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL '12, pages 387--388, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Stylometric relevance-feedback towards a hybrid book recommendation algorithm

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          BooksOnline '12: Proceedings of the fifth ACM workshop on Research advances in large digital book repositories and complementary media
          October 2012
          32 pages
          ISBN:9781450317146
          DOI:10.1145/2390116

          Copyright © 2012 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 29 October 2012

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Upcoming Conference

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader