skip to main content
10.1145/2398776.2398799acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Video stream quality impacts viewer behavior: inferring causality using quasi-experimental designs

Published:14 November 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

The distribution of videos over the Internet is drastically transforming how media is consumed and monetized. Content providers, such as media outlets and video subscription services, would like to ensure that their videos do not fail, startup quickly, and play without interruptions. In return for their investment in video stream quality, content providers expect less viewer abandonment, more viewer engagement, and a greater fraction of repeat viewers, resulting in greater revenues. The key question for a content provider or a CDN is whether and to what extent changes in video quality can cause changes in viewer behavior. Our work is the first to establish a causal relationship between video quality and viewer behavior, taking a step beyond purely correlational studies. To establish causality, we use Quasi-Experimental Designs, a novel technique adapted from the medical and social sciences.

We study the impact of video stream quality on viewer behavior in a scientific data-driven manner by using extensive traces from Akamai's streaming network that include 23 million views from 6.7 million unique viewers. We show that viewers start to abandon a video if it takes more than 2 seconds to start up, with each incremental delay of 1 second resulting in a 5.8%increase in the abandonment rate. Further, we show that a moderate amount of interruptions can decrease the average play time of a viewer by a significant amount. A viewer who experiences a rebuffer delay equal to 1% of the video duration plays 5% less of the video in comparison to a similar viewer who experienced no rebuffering. Finally, we show that a viewer who experienced failure is 2.32% less likely to revisit the same site within a week than a similar viewer who did not experience a failure.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Akamai. Stream Analyzer Service Description. http://www.akamai.com/dl/feature_sheets/Stream_Analyzer_Service_Description.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. K. Andreev, B.M. Maggs, A. Meyerson, and R.K. Sitaraman. Designing overlay multicast networks for streaming. In Proceedings of the fifteenth annual ACM symposium on Parallel algorithms and architectures, pages 149--158. ACM, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. N. Bhatti, A. Bouch, and A. Kuchinsky. Integrating user-perceived quality into web server design. Computer Networks, 33(1):1--16, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Cha, H. Kwak, P. Rodriguez, Y.Y. Ahn, and S. Moon. I tube, You Tube, Everybody Tubes: Analyzing the World's Largest User Generated Content Video System. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, pages 1--14, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. H. Chen, S. Ng, and A.R. Rao. Cultural differences in consumer impatience. Journal of Marketing Research, pages 291--301, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. K.T. Chen, C.Y. Huang, P. Huang, and C.L. Lei. Quantifying skype user satisfaction. In ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, volume 36, pages 399--410. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Claypool and J. Tanner. The effects of jitter on the peceptual quality of video. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM international conference on Multimedia (Part 2), pages 115--118. ACM, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. John Dilley, Bruce M. Maggs, Jay Parikh, Harald Prokop, Ramesh K. Sitaraman, and William E. Weihl. Globally distributed content delivery. IEEE Internet Computing, 6(5):50--58, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Florin Dobrian, Vyas Sekar, Asad Awan, Ion Stoica, Dilip Joseph, Aditya Ganjam, Jibin Zhan, and Hui Zhang. Understanding the impact of video quality on user engagement. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication, pages 362--373, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S.R. Gulliver and G. Ghinea. Defining user perception of distributed multimedia quality. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMCCAP), 2(4):241--257, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. R. Kohavi, R. Longbotham, D. Sommerfield, and R.M. Henne. Controlled experiments on the web: survey and practical guide. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 18(1):140--181, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. L. Kontothanassis, R. Sitaraman, J. Wein, D. Hong, R. Kleinberg, B. Mancuso, D. Shaw, and D. Stodolsky. A transport layer for live streaming in a content delivery network. Proceedings of the IEEE, 92(9):1408--1419, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. R.C. Larson. Perspectives on queues: Social justice and the psychology of queueing. Operations Research, pages 895--905, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. E.L. Lehmann and J.P. Romano. Testing statistical hypotheses. Springer Verlag, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. X. Liu, F. Dobrian, H. Milner, J. Jiang, V. Sekar, I. Stoica, and H. Zhang. A case for a coordinated internet video control plane. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication, pages 359--370, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Steve Lohr. For impatient web users, an eye blink is just too long to wait. New York Times, February 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. E. Nygren, R.K. Sitaraman, and J. Sun. The Akamai Network: A platform for high-performance Internet applications. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 44(3):2--19, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. H. Oktay, B.J. Taylor, and D.D. Jensen. Causal discovery in social media using quasi-experimental designs. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics, pages 1--9. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Akamai White Paper. Akamai Streaming: When Performance Matters, 2004. http://www.akamai.com/dl/whitepapers/Akamai_Streaming_Performance_Whitepaper.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. G.E. Quinn, C.H. Shin, M.G. Maguire, R.A. Stone, et al. Myopia and ambient lighting at night. Nature, 399(6732):113--113, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Jupiter Research. Retail Web Site Performance, June 2006. http://www.akamai.com/html/about/press/releases/2006/press_110606.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. P.R. Rosenbaum and D.B. Rubin. Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. American Statistician, pages 33--38, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. W.R. Shadish, T.D. Cook, and D.T. Campbell. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton, Mifflin and Company, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. R.K. Sitaraman and R.W. Barton. Method and apparatus for measuring stream availability, quality and performance, February 2003. US Patent 7,010,598.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. K. Sripanidkulchai, B. Maggs, and H. Zhang. An analysis of live streaming workloads on the internet. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, pages 41--54, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. D.A. Wolfe and M. Hollander. Nonparametric statistical methods. Nonparametric statistical methods, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. W. Wu, A. Arefin, R. Rivas, K. Nahrstedt, R. Sheppard, and Z. Yang. Quality of experience in distributed interactive multimedia environments: toward a theoretical framework. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 481--490, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Video stream quality impacts viewer behavior: inferring causality using quasi-experimental designs

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          IMC '12: Proceedings of the 2012 Internet Measurement Conference
          November 2012
          572 pages
          ISBN:9781450317054
          DOI:10.1145/2398776

          Copyright © 2012 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 14 November 2012

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate277of1,083submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

          IMC '24
          ACM Internet Measurement Conference
          November 4 - 6, 2024
          Madrid , AA , Spain

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader