Batya Friedman
- 1 Dagger, R. . Annals of democracy. The New Yorker (November 7, 1988): 40-46, 51-52, 54, 56, 61-68, 97-100, 102-108.Google Scholar
- 2 Friedman, B. (ed.). Human values and the design of computer technology. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., in press. Google Scholar
- 3 Friedman, B., Brok, E., Roth, S. K., and Thomas, J. Minimizing bias in computer systems: CHI '95 Workshop. SIGCHI Bulletin 28, 1 (1996): 48-51. Google Scholar
- 4 Friedman, B. and Kahn, P. H., Jr. Human agency and responsible computing: Implications for computer system design. Journal of Systems Software 17 (1992): 7-14. Google Scholar
- 5 Friedman, B. and Nissenbaum, H. Bias in computer systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 14, 3 (1996): 1-18. Google Scholar
- 6 Friedman, B. and Nissenbaum, H. User autonomy: Who should control what and when? Conference Companion of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '96 Association for Computing Machinery, New York, April 1996, p. Google Scholar
- 7 Friedman, B. and Winograd, T. (eds.). Computing and social responsibility: A collection of course syllabi. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility, Palo Alto, Calif., 1990. Google Scholar
- 8 Gewirth, A. Reason and morality. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1978.Google Scholar
- 9 Hill, T. E., Jr. Autonomy and selfrespect. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 1991.Google Scholar
- 10 Huff, C. and Cooper, J. Sex bias in educational software: The effect of designers' stereotypes on the software they design. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 17 (1987): 519-532.Google Scholar
- 11 Laurel, B. Interface agents: Metaphors with character. In B. Laurel (ed.), The art of humancomputer interface design Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1990, pp. 355-365.Google Scholar
- 12 Malone, T. W., Lai, K. Y., and Fry, C. Experiments with Oval: A radically tailorable tool for cooperative work. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '92), Toronto, Ontario, November 1992. Google Scholar
- 13 Perry, J., Macken, E., Scott, N., and McKinley. Disability, inability and cyberspace. In B. Friedman (ed.), Human values and the design of computer technology. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., in press. Google Scholar
- 14 Roth, A. E. The evolution of the labor market for medical interns and residents: A case study in game theory. Journal of Political Economy 92 (1984): 991-1016.Google Scholar
- 15 Roth, A. E. New physicians: A natural experiment in market organization. Science 250 (1990): 1524-1528.Google Scholar
- 16 Roth, S. K. The unconsidered ballot: How design effects voting behavior. Visible Language 28 (1994): 48-67.Google Scholar
- 17 Shifrin, C. A. Justice will weigh suit challenging airlines' computer reservations. Aviation Week & Space Technology (March 1985), p. 105.Google Scholar
- 18 Shneiderman, B. and Rose, A. Social impact statements: Engaging public participation in information technology design. In B. Friedman (ed.), Human values and the design of computer technology. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., in press. Google Scholar
- 19 Taib, I. M. Loophole allows bias in displays on computer reservations systems. Aviation Week & Space Technology (February 1990), p. 137.Google Scholar
- 20 Tang, J. C. Eliminating a hardware switch: Weighing economics and values in a design decision. In B. Friedman (ed.), Human values and the design of computer technology. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., in press. Google Scholar
- 21 Thomas, J. C. Steps toward universal access within a communications company. In B. Friedman (ed.), Human values and the design of computer technology. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., in press. Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Value-sensitive design
Recommendations
A Survey of Value Sensitive Design Methods
Value sensitive design is a theoretically grounded approach to the designof technology that accounts for human values in a principled andsystematic manner throughout the design process. In this article weprovide a survey of 14 value sensitive design ...
Towards Value-Sensitive Learning Analytics Design
LAK19: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & KnowledgeTo support ethical considerations and system integrity in learning analytics, this paper introduces two cases of applying the Value Sensitive Design methodology to learning analytics design. The first study applied two methods of Value Sensitive Design, ...
A value sensitive action-reflection model: evolving a co-design space with stakeholder and designer prompts
CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe introduce a design method for evolving a co-design space to support stakeholders untrained in design. Specifically, the purpose of the method is to expand and shape a co-design space so that stakeholders, acting as designers, focus not only on the ...
Comments