skip to main content
10.1145/2441776.2441831acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Hollaback!: the role of storytelling online in a social movement organization

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 February 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

CSCW systems are playing an increasing role in activism. How can new communications technologies support social movements? The possibilities are intriguing, but as yet not fully understood. One key technique traditionally leveraged by social movements is storytelling. In this paper, we examine the use of collective storytelling online in the context of a social movement organization called Hollaback, an organization working to stop street harassment. Can sharing a story of experienced harassment really make a difference to an individual or a community? Using Emancipatory Action Research and qualitative methods, we interviewed people who contributed stories of harassment online. We found that sharing stories shifted participants' cognitive and emotional orientation towards their experience. The theory of "framing" from social movement research explains the surprising power of this experience for Hollaback participants. We contribute a way of looking at activism online using social movement theory. Our work illustrates that technology can help crowd-sourced framing processes that have traditionally been done by social movement organizations.

References

  1. Bar, F., Brough, M., Costanza-Chock, S., Gonzalez, C., Wallis, C., and Garces, A. Mobile Voices: A Mobile, Open Source, Popular Communication Platform for First-Generation Immigrants in Los Angeles. Unpublished paper presented at the Preconference workshop at the International Communication Association, (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bardzell, S. and Bardzell, J. Towards a Feminist HCI Methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI. CHI (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bardzell, S. Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design. CHI (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bell, L. A. Storytelling for social justice: Connecting narrative and the arts in antiracist teaching. Taylor & Francis, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Benford, R. and Snow, D. Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26, (2000), 611--639.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bidwell, N. J., Reitmaier, T., Marsden, G., and Han-sen, S. Designing with Mobile Digital Storytelling in rural Africa. CHI (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Di Blas, N., Paolini, P., and Sabiescu, A. Collective Digital Storytelling at School as a Whole-Class Interaction. IDC (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cao, X., Lindley, S. E., Helmes, J., and Sellen, A. Telling the Whole Story: anticipation, inspiration and reputation in a field deployment of TellTable. CSCW (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Christensen, H. S. Political activities on the Internet: Slacktivism or political participation by other means? First Monday 16, 2--7 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Coleman, G. Anonymous: From the Lulz to Collective Action. The New Everyday: A Media Commons Project 6, (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., and Mariani, J. Collaborating around collections: informing the continued development of photoware. CSCW (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Cutrell, E. Technology for emerging markets at MSR India. CSCW (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Davis, J. E. Stories of change: Narrative and social movements. State Univ of New York Pr, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Diakopoulos, N. A. and Shamma, D. A. Characterizing debate performance via aggregated twitter sentiment. CHI (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Dimond, J. Feminist HCI For Real: Designing Technology in Support of a Social Movement. Dissertation. Georgia Institute of Technology 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Erickson, T. Design as storytelling. Interactions 3, 4 (1996), 30--35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Foth, M., Choi, J. H., and Satchell, C. Urban informatics. CSCW (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Frohlich, D. M., Rachovides, D., Riga, K., et al. StoryBank: mobile digital storytelling in a development context. CHI (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Ganz, M. The power of story in social movements. unpublished paper for the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Anahem, California, August, (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Gardner, C. B. Passing by: Gender and public harassment. Univ of California Pr on Demand, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Garrett, R. K. Protest in an information society: A review of literature on social movements and new ICTs. Information, Communication & Society 9, 2 (2006), 202--224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Gelsomino, M. The Zapatista Effect: Information Communication Technology Activism and Marginalized Communities. Faculty of Information Quarterly 2, 2 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Gilbert, E. and Karahalios, K. Widespread worry and the stock market. ICWSM (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Gladwell, M. Twitter, Facebook, and social activism. The New Yorker, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Grimes, A., Bednar, M., Bolter, J. D., and Grinter, R. E. EatWell: sharing nutrition-related memories in a low-income community. CSCW (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Grimes, A., Tan, D., and Morris, D. Toward technologies that support family reflections on health. GROUP, ACM (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Hardt, M. and Negri, A. The Fight for 'Real Democracy' at the Heart of Occupy Wall Street. Foreign Affairs {Online} 11, (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Hayes, G. The Relationship of Action Research to HCI. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 18, 3 (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Herr, K. and Anderson, G. L. The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. Sage Publications, Inc, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Jagori and UNIFEM. Safe City Free of Violence against Women and Girls Initiative. (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Jordan, T. and Taylor, P. A. Hacktivism and cyberwars: rebels with a cause? Psychology Press, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Kearl, H. Stop street harassment: Making public places safe and welcoming for women. Praeger Publishers, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Kolko, B. E., Hope, A., Brunette, W., et al. Adapting collaborative radiological practice to low-resource environments. CSCW (2012) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Lambert, J. Digital storytelling: capturing lives creaing community. (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Lu, F., Tian, F., Jiang, Y., et al. ShadowStory: creative and collaborative digital storytelling inspired by cultural heritage. CHI (2011) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Macmillan, R., Nierobisz, A., and Welsh, S. Experiencing the streets: Harassment and perceptions of safety among women. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 37, 3 (2000), 306--322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Masters, J. The History of Action Research. Action Research Electronic Reader, (1995).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. McAdam, D., Zald, M. N., and McCarthy, J. D. Comparative perspectives on social movements. Cambridge University Press Cambridge, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Meier, P. P. The Impact of the Information Revolution on Protest Frequency in Repressive Contexts. International Studies Association annual meeting, New York, NY, March, (2009), 1994--2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE publications, Inc, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Monroy-Hernández, A. and Yun, F. A monkey and a stick figure: stories of remixing and social creativity. CSCW (2012) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Morozov, E. The brave new world of slacktivism. Foreign Policy 19, (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Newman, M. W., Lauterbach, D., Munson, S. A., Resnick, P., and Morris, M. E. It's not that I don't have problems, I'm just not putting them on Facebook: challenges and opportunities in using online social networks for health. CSCW (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Pousman, Z., Rouzati, H., and Stasko, J. Imprint, a community visualization of printer data: designing for open-ended engagement on sustainability. CSCW (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. The SAGE handbook of action research: participative inquiry: participative inquiry and practice. Sage, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Romero, D. M., Meeder, B., and Kleinberg, J. Differ-ences in the mechanics of information diffusion across topics: Idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion on Twitter. Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web, (2011), 695--704. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Rotman, D., Vieweg, S., Yardi, S., et al. From slacktivism to activism: participatory culture in the age of social media. Extended Abstract CHI (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Shen, C., Lesh, N. B., Vernier, F., Forlines, C., and Frost, J. Sharing and building digital group histories. CSCW (2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Shklovski, I., Palen, L., and Sutton, J. Finding community through information and communication technology in disaster response. CSCW (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Silberman, M. S., Ross, J., Irani, L., and Tomlinson, B. Sellers' problems in human computation markets. Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Human Computation, (2010), 18--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Smyth, T. N., Etherton, J., and Best, M. L. MOSES: exploring new ground in media and post-conflict reconciliation. Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2010), 1059--1068. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Snow, D. A. and Soule, S. A. A primer on social movements. WW Norton, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Starbird, K. and Palen, L. "Voluntweeters": self-organizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis. CHI (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Starbird, K. and Palen, L. (How) will the revolution be retweeted?: information diffusion and the 2011 Egyptian uprising. CSCW (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Sterling, S. R., O'Brien, J., and Bennett, J. K. Ad-vancement through interactive radio. Information Systems Frontiers 11, 2 (2009), 145--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Re-search: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Tarrow, S. Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Tufekci, Z. and Wilson, C. Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations From Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication 62, 2 (2012), 363--379.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. White, A. M. Talking Feminist, Talking Black: Micromobilization Processes in a Collective Protest against Rape. Gender & Society 13, 1 (1999), 77--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Wyche, S. P., Oreglia, E., Ames, M. G., et al. Learn-ing from marginalized users: reciprocity in HCI4D. CSCW (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Hollaback!: the role of storytelling online in a social movement organization

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '13: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
      February 2013
      1594 pages
      ISBN:9781450313315
      DOI:10.1145/2441776

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 February 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader