skip to main content
10.1145/2459236.2459254acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesahConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Device-free and device-bound activity recognition using radio signal strength

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 March 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Background: We investigate direct use of 802.15.4 radio signal strength indication (RSSI) for human activity recognition when 1) a user carries a wireless node (device-bound) and when 2) a user moves in the wireless sensor net (WSN) without a WSN node (device-free). We investigate recognition feasibility in respect to network topology, subject and room geometry (door open, half, closed).

Methods: In a 2 person office room 8 wireless nodes are installed in a 3D topology. Two subjects are outfitted with a sensor node on the hip. Acceleration and RSSI are recorded while subject performs 6 different activities or room is empty. We apply machine learning for analysis and compare our results to acceleration data.

Results: 10-fold cross-validation with all nodes gives accuracies of 0.896 (device-bound), 0.894 (device-free) and 0.88 (accelerometer). Topology investigation reveals that similar accuracies may be reached with only 5 (device-bound) or 4 (device-free) selected nodes. Applying trained data from one subject to the other and vice-versa shows higher recognition difference on RSSI than on acceleration. Changing of door state has smaller effect on both systems than subject change; with least impact when door is closed.

Conclusion: 802.15.4 RSSI suited for activity recognition. 3D topology is helpful in respect to type of activities. Discrimination of subjects seems possible. Practical systems must adapt no only to long-term environmental dispersion but consider typical geometric changes. Adaptable, robust recognition models must be developed.

References

  1. L. Bao and S. Intille. Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. In A. Ferscha and F. Mattern, editors, Pervasive Computing, volume 3001 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 1--17. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. C. Bouten, K. Koekkoek, M. Verduin, R. Kodde, and J. Janssen. A triaxial accelerometer and portable data processing unit for the assessment of daily physical activity. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 44(3):136--147, Mar. 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. G. Cohn, D. Morris, S. Patel, and D. Tan. Humantenna: using the body as an antenna for real-time whole-body interaction. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '12, pages 1901--1910, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. P. Misra, N. Ahmed, D. Ostry, and S. Jha. Characterization of asymmetry in low-power wireless links: an empirical study. In Proceedings of the 12th ICDCN'11, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. N. Patwari and J. Wilson. Spatial models for human motion-induced signal strength variance on static links. Information Forensics and Security, IEEE Transactions on, 6(3):791--802, sept. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. M. Reschke, J. Starosta, S. Schwarzl, and S. Sigg. Situation awareness based on channel measurements. In Proceedings of the fourth Conference on Context Awareness for Proactive Systems (CAPS), 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M. Scholz, S. Sigg, G. Bagschik, T. Guenther, G. von Zengen, D. Shishkova, Y. Ji, and M. Beigl. Sensewaves: Radiowaves for context recognition, video submission. In Pervasive, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Scholz, S. Sigg, H. R. Schmidtke, and M. Beigl. Challenges for device-free radio-based activity recognition. In Workshop on Context Systems, Design, Evaluation and Optimisation, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. S. Shi, S. Sigg, and Y. Ji. Activity recognition from radio frequency data: Multi-stage recognition and features. In VTC2012 Fall, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S. Shi, S. Sigg, and Y. Ji. Passive detection of situations from ambient fm-radio signals. In SegaWare Workshop in Conjunction UbiComp '12., 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. T. Sohn, A. Varshavsky, A. Lamarca, M. Y. Chen, T. Choudhury, I. Smith, S. Consolvo, J. Hightower, W. G. Griswold, and E. D. Lara. Mobility detection using everyday gsm traces. In Ubicomp 2006, pages 212--224. Springer, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Wilson and N. Patwari. A fade-level skew-laplace signal strength model for device-free localization with wireless networks. Mobile Computing, IEEE Transactions on, 11(6):947--958, june 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. K. Woyach, D. Puccinelli, and M. Haenggi. Sensorless sensing in wireless networks: implementation and measurements. In 2nd International Workshop on Wireless Network Measurement (WiNMee), 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. M. Youssef, M. Mah, and A. Agrawala. Challenges: device-free passive localization for wireless environments. In Proceedings of the 13th MobiCom, pages 222--229, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. D. Zhang and L. Ni. Dynamic clustering for tracking multiple transceiver-free objects. In PerCom, march 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Device-free and device-bound activity recognition using radio signal strength

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        AH '13: Proceedings of the 4th Augmented Human International Conference
        March 2013
        254 pages
        ISBN:9781450319041
        DOI:10.1145/2459236

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 March 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        AH '13 Paper Acceptance Rate49of69submissions,71%Overall Acceptance Rate121of306submissions,40%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader