skip to main content
10.1145/2460296.2460324acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improving retention: predicting at-risk students by analysing clicking behaviour in a virtual learning environment

Published:08 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

One of the key interests for learning analytics is how it can be used to improve retention. This paper focuses on work conducted at the Open University (OU) into predicting students who are at risk of failing their module. The Open University is one of the worlds largest distance learning institutions. Since tutors do not interact face to face with students, it can be difficult for tutors to identify and respond to students who are struggling in time to try to resolve the difficulty. Predictive models have been developed and tested using historic Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) activity data combined with other data sources, for three OU modules. This has revealed that it is possible to predict student failure by looking for changes in user's activity in the VLE, when compared against their own previous behaviour, or that of students who can be categorised as having similar learning behaviour. More focused analysis of these modules applying the GUHA (General Unary Hypothesis Automaton) method of data analysis has also yielded some early promising results for creating accurate hypothesis about students who fail.

References

  1. Arnold, K. E. and Pistilli, M. D. (2012) Course Signals at Purdue: Using Learning Analytics to increase student success. LAK '12, 29 April -- 2 May, Vancouver, Canada Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Campbell, J. P. and Oblinger, D. G. (2007) Academic Analytics. White paper. Educause. http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub6101.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dekker, G., Pechenizkiy, M. and Vleeshouwers, J. (2009) Predicting Students Drop Out: a Case Study, In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM'09), pp. 41--50Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Diaz, D. P. (2000). Comparison of student characteristics, and evaluation of student success, in an online health education course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Retrieved from http://academic.cuesta.edu/ltseries/sitepgs/pdf/dissertn.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Frankola, K. (2002). Why online learners drop out. Crain Communications, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.kfrankola.com/Documents/Why%20online%20learners%20drop%20out_Workforce.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fusch, D. (2011) Identifying At-Risk Students: What Data Are You Looking At? Retrieved from http://www.academicimpressions.com/news/identifying-risk-students-what-data-are-you-lookingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Galusha, J. M. (1997). Barriers to learning in distance education. Retrieved from http://www.infrastruction.com/barriers.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hájek, P., Havel, I., and Chytil, M. (1966). The GUHA method of automatic hypotheses determination. Computing, 1, 293--308Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Hájek P., Holena and Rauch J. (2010) The GUHA method and its meaning for data mining. J. Computer and System Sciences, 76, 34--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hammang, J. M., Campbell, J. P., Smith, V. C., Sweeley, D., Ushveridze, A. and Woosley, S. (2010) Predictive Analytics: Building a Crystal Ball for Student Success. Webinar. http://www.uregina.ca/orp/PapersPresentations/SCUP_Webinar_Sept29_2010.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mazza, R. and Dimitrova, V. (2004) Visualising Student Tracking Data to Support Instructors in Web-Based Distance Education, 13th International World Wide Web Conference - Alter-nate Educational Track, 154--161. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Pistilli, M. D. and Arnold, K. E. (2010) Purdue Signals: Mining real-time academic data to enhance student success. About Campus, July-August, 22--24 DOI: 10.1002/abc.20025Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Quinlan, J. R. (1993) C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Rivera, J. C. and Rice, M. L. (2002). A comparison of student outcomes & satisfaction between traditional & web based course offerings. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. The State University of West Georgia, 5(3).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Simpson, O. (2004) The impact on retention of interventions to support distance learning students, Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 19, 1, 79--95Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Simpson, O. (2008) Motivating learners in open and distance learning: do we need a new theory of learner support? Open Learning: the journal of open and distance learning, 23, 3, 159--170Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Smith, V. C. and Sweeley, D. (2010) Predictive Analytics: Increasing Online Student Engagement and Success. Retrieved from http://www.uregina.ca/orp/PapersPresentations/SCUP_Webinar_Sept29_2010.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Thompson, M. M. (1998). Distance learners in higher education. In C. C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance learners in higher education (pp. 9--24). Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Improving retention: predicting at-risk students by analysing clicking behaviour in a virtual learning environment

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        LAK '13: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge
        April 2013
        300 pages
        ISBN:9781450317856
        DOI:10.1145/2460296

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 April 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        LAK '13 Paper Acceptance Rate16of58submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate236of782submissions,30%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader