skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2466152acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

At home with agents: exploring attitudes towards future smart energy infrastructures

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Energy systems researchers are proposing a broad range of future "smart" energy infrastructures to promote more efficient management of energy resources. This paper considers how consumers might relate to these future smart grids within the UK. To address this challenge we exploited a combination of demonstration and animated sketches to convey the nature of a future smart energy infrastructure based on software agents. Users' reactions suggested that although they felt an obligation to engage with energy issues, they were principally disinterested. Users showed a considerable lack of trust in energy companies raising a dilemma of design. While users might welcome agents to help in engaging with complex energy infrastructures, they had little faith in those that might provide them. This suggests the need to consider how to design software agents to enhance trust in these socio-economic settings.

References

  1. Brynjarsdottir, H., Håkansson, M., Pierce, J., Baumer, E., DiSalvo, C., and Sengers, P. Sustainably unpersuaded: how persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability. Proc. CHI '12, ACM Press (2012), 947--956. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Buxton, B. Sketching User Experiences. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chetty, M., Sung, J.-Y., and Grinter, R. E. How smart homes learn: the evolution of the networked home and household. Proc. UbiComp '07, Springer (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Dept. of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) and the Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (OfGEM). Smart Metering Implementation Programme. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. DiSalvo, C. and Sengers, P. Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI. Proc. CHI '10, ACM Press (2010), 1975--1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dourish, P., Button. G. On "Technomethodology": foundational relationships between ethnomethodology and system design. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 13, 4 (1998), 395--432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dourish, P. HCI and Environmental Sustainability: The Politics of Design and the Design of Politics. Proc. DIS '10, ACM Press (2010), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Forlizzi, J. and DiSalvo, C. Microsketching: creating components of complex interactive products and systems. Proc. C&C '09, ACM Press (2009), 87--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Froehlich, J. and Findlater, L. The design of ecofeedback technology. Proc. CHI '10, ACM Press (2010), 1999--2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kensing, F. and Madsen, K. H. Generating visions: future workshops and metaphorical design. In J. Greenbaum and M. Kyng, eds., Design at work cooperative design of computer systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (1991), 155--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kitzinger. J. Introducing focus groups. BMJ, 311 (1995), 299--302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. MacKay, D. J. Sustainable Energy - Without the Hot Air. UIT Cambridge Ltd., Cambridge, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mancini, C., Rogers, Y., Bandara, A. K., Coe, T., Jedrzejczyk, L., Joinson, A. N., Price, B. A., Thomas, K. and Nuseibeh., B. Contravision: exploring users' reactions to futuristic technology. Proc. CHI '10, ACM Press (2010), 153--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Pierce, J. and Paulos, E. Beyond energy monitors: interaction, energy, and emerging energy systems. Proc. CHI '12, ACM Press (2012), 665--674. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ramchurn, S. D., Vytelingum, P., Rogers, A., and Jennings, N. R. Agent-Based Homeostatic Control for Green Energy in the Smart Grid. ACM Trans. on Intell. Sys. and Tech. 2, 4 Article 35 (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ramchurn, S. D., Vytelingum, P., Rogers, A., and Jennings, N. R. Putting the 'smarts' into the smart grid. Communications of the ACM 55, 4 (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Reeves, S. Envisioning ubiquitous computing. Proc. CHI '12, ACM Press (2012), 1573--1582. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Scott, J., Brush, A. J. B., Krumm, J., et al. PreHeat: Controlling Home Heating Using Occupancy Prediction. Proc. UbiComp '11, Springer (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Shove, E. Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning 42, 6 (2010), 1273--1285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Smart Metering Design Group. Industry's Draft Technical Specification. Smart Metering Implementation Programme, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Spees, K. and Lave, L. Impacts of Responsive Load in PJM: Load Shifting and Real Time Pricing. Energy Journal 29, 2 (2008) 101--123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Star, S. L. The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioural Scientist 43, 3 (1999), 377--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Taylor, A. S, Harper, R., Swan, L., Izadi, S., Sellen, A., Perry. M. Homes that make us smart. Personal Ubiquitous Computing 11, 5 (2007), 383--393. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Tohidi, M., Buxton, W., Baecker, R., and Sellen, A. User sketches: A Quick, Inexpensive, and Effective way to Elicit More Reflective User Feedback. Proc. NordiCHI '06, ACM Press (2006), 105--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Tomlinson, B., Silberman, M. S., & White, J. Can More Efficient IT Be Worse for the Environment? Computer 44, 1 (2011), 87--89. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. US Dept. of Energy. Benefits of demand response in electricity markets and recommendations for achieving them. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Zimmerman, J. Video Sketches: Exploring Pervasive Computing Interaction Designs. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 4, 4 (2005), 91--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. At home with agents: exploring attitudes towards future smart energy infrastructures

    Recommendations

    Reviews

    Debraj De

    Smart grids are quickly becoming important in the redesign of the energy generation-distribution framework, intended to increase efficiency, robustness, adaptability, and environmental friendliness. Energy system researchers and companies are proposing a variety of designs and architectures for future smart energy infrastructures. However, the study of general users and consumers has shown a lack of trust and acceptance, especially with respect to energy providers. Based on these observations, the authors of this paper have used human-computer interaction (HCI) approaches to design demonstrations and animated sketches that convey information about future smart energy infrastructures. The goal is to present the future infrastructures to consumers in a socioeconomic context, to enhance trust in the energy providers and in the smart grid developments. The work offers two main contributions: (1) exploration and analysis of the attitudes of UK "energy consumers" concerning future smart energy infrastructures, such as smart meters, embedded software agents at home and in the grid, and energy networks; and (2) demonstrations that prove the effectiveness of whiteboard animations to convey the smart energy infrastructures and solicit views from users. The authors focus on the lack of trust between energy consumers and providers, and propose HCI-based designs for software agents that can help mitigate the problem. To do this, the study considered three main research questions: (1) consumer response to and acceptance of the software agent's autonomy and control; (2) consumer trust of active energy infrastructure; and (3) privacy concerns in energy monitoring. The authors developed animated sketches to describe and demonstrate the energy infrastructure to consumers. These sketches are disposable, minimalist, exploratory, and ambiguous. The animated sketches consist of three parts with pauses in between. The first part portrays the current state of the world, the second projects the state into the near future, and the third looks further into the future. The current state of the world includes a meter-based energy-charging model, off-the-shelf electricity-monitoring devices, electricity consumption data in the cloud, and peak leveling. The near future highlights smart meters, dynamic pricing, and software agents. The paper then presents a study and feedback from focus groups on the key issues. Based on this feedback, the authors suggest four key design principles for designing the software agents and the smart energy infrastructures. Overall, this paper is worth reading for the study of user attitudes toward smart grids and software agents in the UK. The proposed HCI-based intentionally structured, animated sketches and the resulting feedback are valuable research outcomes. The paper is recommended for audiences interested in smart grids and related socioeconomic and political issues. Online Computing Reviews Service

    Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

    Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader