skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2466155acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The dubuque electricity portal: evaluation of a city-scale residential electricity consumption feedback system

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the Dubuque Electricity Portal, a city-scale system aimed at supporting voluntary reductions of electricity consumption. The Portal provided each household with fine-grained feedback on its electricity use, as well as using incentives, comparisons, and goal setting to encourage conservation. Logs, a survey and interviews were used to evaluate the user experience of the Portal during a 20-week pilot with 765 volunteer households. Although the volunteers had already made a wide range of changes to conserve electricity prior to the pilot, those who used the Portal decreased their electricity use by about 3.7%. They also reported increased understanding of their usage, and reported taking an array of actions - both changing their behavior and their electricity infrastructure. The paper discusses the experience of the system's users, and describes challenges for the design of ECF systems, including balancing accessibility and security, a preference for time-based visualizations, and the advisability of multiple modes of feedback, incentives and information presentation.

References

  1. Abrahamsen, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C. and Rothengatter, T. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. J. Environmental Psyc., 25, 3 (2008), 273--291.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Blevis, E. Sustainable interaction design: Invention & disposal, renewal & reuse. Proc. CHI '07, ACM (2007), 503--512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brynjarsdottir, H., Håkansson, M., Pierce, J., Baumer, E., DiSalvo, C. and Sengers, P. Sustainably unpersuaded: How persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability. Proc. CHI '12. ACM (2012), 947--956. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Carroll, E., Hatton, E., and Brown, M. Residential energy use behavior change pilot. 2009. http://opower.com/uploads/library/file/3/residential_energy_use_behavior_change_pilot.pdf. Accessed 9-18-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Darby, S. The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption. 2006. http://www.usclcorp.com/news/DEFRA-report-withappendix.pdf. Accessed 9-17-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Darby, S. Social learning and public policy: Lessons from an energy-conscious village. Energy Policy, 34 (2006), 2929--2940.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. DiSalvo, C., Sengers, P., and Brynjarsdóttir, H. Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI. Proc. CHI '10, ACM (2010), 1975--1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dourish, P. HCI and environmental sustainability: The politics of design and the design of politics. Proc. DIS, '10. ACM (2010), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Erickson, T., Podlaseck, M. E., Sahu, S., Dai, J. D., Chao, T. and Naphade, M. The Dubuque Water Portal: Evaluation of the uptake, use and impact of residential water consumption feedback. Proc. CHI '12. ACM (2012), 675--684. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fischer, C. Feedback on household electricity consumption: A tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency, 1, (2008), 79--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., and Landay, J. The design of eco-feedback technology. Proc. CHI '10. ACM (2010), 1999--2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hargreaves, T., Nye, M. and Burgess, J. Making energy visible: A qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors. Energy Policy, (2010), 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. MacLellan, D. NSTAR Power Cost Monitor Pilot. (2008) http://piee.stanford.edu/cgibin/docs/behavior/becc/2008/presentations/19-5E-03NSTAR_Power_Cost_Monitor_Pilot.pdf. Accessed 9-18-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Parker, D. S., Hoak, D., Cummings J. "Pilot evaluation of energy savings from residential energy demand feedback devices." Final Report by the Florida Solar Energy Center to the U.S. Dept. of Energy, 2008. http://www.fsec.ucf.edu/en/publications/pdf/FSEC-CR1742-08.pdf Accessed 9-19-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Petersen, J. E., V. Shunturov, K. Janda, G. Platt, K. Weinberger. Combining real-time feedback on resource use with incentives stimulates dormitory residents to reduce electricity consumption. Int. J. of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8, (2007), 16--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Pierce, J., Odom, W., and Blevis, E. Energy aware dwelling: A critical survey of interaction design for ecovisualizations. Proc. OZCHI '08, ACM (2008), 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Pierce, J., Fan, C., Lomas, D., Marcu, G. and Paulos, E. Some consideration on the (in)effectiveness of residential energy feedback systems. Proc. DIS '10, ACM (2010), 244--247. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Pierce, J., Schianno, D., Paulos. E. Home, habits, and energy: examining domestic interactions and energy consumption. Proc. CHI '10. ACM (2010), 675--684. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Pierce, J. and Paulos, E. Beyond energy monitors: interaction, energy, and emerging energy systems. In Proc. CHI '12. ACM (2012), 665--674. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Strengers, Y. Designing eco-feedback systems for everyday life. Proc. CHI '11. ACM (2011), 2135--2144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Von Hippel, E. Lead users: A source of novel product concepts, Management Science 32, 7 (1986), 791--806. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Von Hippel, E. Democratizing innovation. MIT Press, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The dubuque electricity portal: evaluation of a city-scale residential electricity consumption feedback system

    Recommendations

    Reviews

    Joao Orvalho

    The smart city movement is a very important research drive nowadays and the field of human-computer interaction (HCI) has much to contribute in “electricity consumption feedback research (ECF).” This paper describes a very important project in the city of Dubuque, the Dubuque 2.0 NGO, where 756 households participated in a pilot study. Logs, a survey, and interviews were used to evaluate the Dubuque electricity portal, a system aimed at supporting voluntary reductions of electricity consumption. In this very important paper, readers can study and be aware of the several angles to observe in a challenge, that is, the reduction of CO2: “In our view, the most likely instigator for radical changes in consumption will be either crises or prices, most likely both. In this case some form of ECF will be a necessary part of the solution.” What do they mean__?__ “Individuals will still need to understand their consumption, and be able to view it in the context of achieving societal goals (e.g., avoiding rolling brownouts) or avoiding individual penalties (e.g., triggering higher prices in a tiered energy pricing regime).” This case study is quite important and should be replicated in other cities. It will attract volunteers to similar studies and encourage energy conservation. Online Computing Reviews Service

    Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

    Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader