skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2466225acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

What makes you click: exploring visual signals to entice interaction on public displays

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Most studies take for granted the critical first steps that prelude interaction with a public display: awareness of the interactive affordances of the display, and enticement to interact. In this paper we investigate mechanisms for enticing interaction on public displays, and study the effectiveness of visual signals in overcoming the 'first click' problem. We combined 3 atomic visual elements (color/greyscale, animation/static, and icon/text) to form 8 visual signals that were deployed on 8 interactive public displays on a university campus for 8 days. Our findings show that text is more effective in enticing interaction than icons, color more than greyscale, and static signals are more effective than animated. Further, we identify gender differences in the effectiveness of these signals. Finally, we identify a behavior termed "display avoidance" that people exhibit with interactive public displays.

References

  1. Adams, R., & Russell, C.: Lessons from Ambient Intelligence Prototypes for Universal Access and the User Experience. In: Stephanidis, C., Pieper, M. (eds) ERCIM UI4ALL WS 2006, LNCS 4397, Berlin, Heidelberg, (2006) 229--243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Agamanolis, S.: Designing Displays for Human Connectedness. In Workshop on Public, Community and Situated Displays at CSCW '02, (2002) New Orleans.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartram, L., Ware, C., & Calvert, T.: Moving Icons: Detection and Distraction. In Proc. INTERACT '01, (2001) 157--165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Brignull, H. & Rogers, Y.: Enticing People to Interact with Large Public Displays in Public Spaces. In Proc. INTERACT '03 (2003), 17--24,.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Cassell, P., Stocky, T., Bickmore, T., Gao, Y., Nakano, U., Ryokay, K., Tversky, D., Vaucelle, C., Vilhjálmsson, H.: MACK: Media Lab Autonomous Conversational Kiosk. In Proc. of Imagina, (2002) 1215 .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Churchill, E., Nelson, L., Denoue, L., Hefman, J., & Murphy, P.: Sharing Multimedia Content with Public Displays: A Case Study. In Proc. DIS '04, (2004) 716. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Christian, A. D., Avery, B.L.: Speak out and annoy someone: experience with intelligent kiosks. In Proc. CHI '00, (2000) 313--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Faraday, P., & Sutcliffe, A.: Designing Effective multimedia Presentations. In Proc. CHI '97, (1997) 272--279. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Goffman, E.: Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. Free Press (1966)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Greenberg, S., & Rounding, M.: The Notification Collage: Posting Information to Public and Personal Displays. In CHI Letters 3(1), (2001) 515--521. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hallock, J.: Colour Assignment. Online document, available at http://www.joehallock.com/edu/COM498/index.html, last retrieved 28.02.2012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hillstrom, A. & Yantis, S.: Visual Attention and Motion capture. Perception and Psychophysics, (1994) 55(4), 399--311.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang, E. & Borchers, J.: Overcoming Assumptions and Uncovering Practices: When Does the Public Really Look at Public Displays? In Proc. Pervasive '08, (2008) 228--243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ju, W., & Sirkin, D.: Animate Objects: How Physical Motion Encourages Public Interaction. In Proc. Persuasive Technology '10, (2010) 40--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Singh, S.: Impact of Color on Marketing. Management Decision, vol. 44, no. 6, (2006) 783--789.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. How Color Affects Purchases. Online document, available at http://blog.kissmetrics.com/colorpsychology/, last retrieved 28.02.2012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kido, M.: Bio-psychological Effects of Color. Journal of International Society of Life Information Science, vol. 18, no. 1, (2000) 254--262.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Koller, V.: 'Not just a colour' - pink as a gender and sexuality marker in visual communication. Visual Communication, 7, 4 (2008), 395--423.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Kukka, H., Kostakos, V., Ojala, T., Ylipulli, J., Suopajärvi, T., Jurmu, M., Hosio, S.: This is not Classified: Everyday Information Seeking and Encountering in Smart Urban Spaces. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (2013) 17:15--27 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. LeCompte, M., Goetz, J.: Problems of Reliability and Validity in Ethnographic Research. Review of Educational Research 52, 1 (1982), 31--60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. MacDonald, L.W.: Using Color Effectively in Computer Graphics. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 19, 4 (1999), 20--35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. McCauley, L., Mello, S, D.: MIKI: A Speech Enabled Intelligent Kiosk. In Intelligent Virtual Agents (LNCS, Springer, 2006), Vol. 4133, 132--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Michelis, D., & Resatch, F.: Alice Through the Interface: Electronic Mirrors as Human-ComputerInterface. Universal Access in Ambient Intelligence Environments (2006), LNCS ,88--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Mueller, F., Agamanolis, S., Gibbs, M. R., and Vetere, F.: Remote Impact: Shadowboxing Over a Distance. In CHI'08 Extended Abstracts, (2008) 2291--2296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Müller, J., Walter, R., Bailly, G., Nischt, M., Alt, F.: Looking Glass: A Field Study on Noticing Interactivity of a Shop Window. In Proc. CHI '12, (2012) 297--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Müller, J., Alt, F., Schmidt, A., & Michelis, D.: Requirements and Design Space for Interactive Public Displays. In Proc. MM'10, (2010) 1285--1294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Ojala, T., Kostakos, V., Kukka, H., Heikkinen, T., Lindén, T., Jurmu, M., Hosio, S., Kruger F., & Zanni, D.: Multipurpose interactive public displays in the wild: Three years later. Computer 45, 5 (2012), 42--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Peltonen, P., Kurvinen, E., Salovaara, A., Jacucci, G, Ilmonen, T., Evans, J., Oulasvirta, A., and Saarikko, P.: It's Mine, Don't Touch!: Interactions at a Large Multi-Touch Display in a City Centre. In Proc. CHI'08 (2008), 315--331. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Peterson, H., & Dugas, D.: The Relative Importance of Contrast and Motion in Visual Perception. Human Factors, 14 (1972), 207--216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Pinhanez, C.S.: The Everywhere Displays Projector: A Device to Create Ubiquitous Graphical Interfaces. In Proc. UbiComp '01 (2001), 315--331. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Pylyshyn, Z., Burkell, J., Fisher, B., Sears, C., Schmidt, W, Trick, L.: Multiple Parallel Access in visual Attention. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 2 (1993) 260--283.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Reeves, B. & Nass, C.: The Media Equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Scheible, J., & Ojala, T.: MobiSpray: Mobile Phone as a Virtual Spray Can for Painting BIG Anytime Anywhere on Anything. Leonardo 42, 4 (2009), 332341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Steiger, P., Suter, B.A.: MINNELLI -- Experiences with an Interactive Information Kiosk of Casual Users. In Proc. Ubilab '94 (1994), 124--133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Tractinsky, N., Eytam, E.: Considering the Aesthetics of Ubiquitous Displays. In: A. Krüger and T. Kuflik (eds.), Ubiquitous Display Environments, Cognitive Technologies, pp. 89--105. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Vogel, D., & Balakrishnan, R.: Interactive Public Ambient Displays: Transitioning from Implicit to Explicit, Public to Personal, Interaction with Multiple Users. In Proc. UIST'04 (2004), 137--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. What makes you click: exploring visual signals to entice interaction on public displays

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader