skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2481378acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Beyond being green: simple living families and ICT

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Motivated by a need in sustainable HCI for studies of everyday practices, and a belief that a holistic view on sustainability is crucial to deeper understanding of how to design ICT to support sustainability, we here present a qualitative study of 11 simple living families in the US. Simple living refers to a lifestyle which is voluntarily simple out of concern for both the environment and quality of life. Our goal was to learn about a holistic view on sustainability and the role of ICT in helping and hindering families to live simply. The study contributes new insights about how holistic sustainability could be a valuable lens for HCI, revealing that sustainability is important to a wider range of areas in HCI than previously discussed. We conclude with implications for HCI for how to support sustainable practices beyond being "about" being green.

References

  1. Baumer, E. P. S., and Silberman, S. M. When the implication is not to design (technology). In Proc. CHI EA'11. ACM (2011), 2271--2274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Blevis, E. Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse. In Proc. CHI '07. ACM (2007), 503--512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Blythe, M., Monk, A., and Park, J. Technology biographies: field study techniques for home use product development. In Proc. CHI EA'02. ACM (2002), 658--659. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Broms, L., Katzeff, C., Bång, M., Nyblom, Å., Ilstedt Hjelm, S., and Ehrnberger, K. Coffee maker patterns and the design of energy feedback artefacts. In Proc. DIS'10. ACM (2010), 93--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Brynjarsdóttir, H., Håkansson, M., Pierce, J., Baumer, E., DiSalvo, C., and Sengers, P. Sustainably unpersuaded: how persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability. In Proc. CHI '12. ACM (2012), 947--956. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Busse, D., Blevis, E., Beckwith, R., Bardzell, S., Sengers, P., Tomlinson, B., Nathan, L., and Mann, S. Social sustainability: an HCI agenda. In Proc. CHI EA '12. ACM (2012), 1151--1154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chetty, M., Tran, D., and Grinter, R. E. Getting to green: understanding resource consumption in the home. In Proc. UbiComp '08. ACM (2008), 242--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dillahunt, T., Mankoff, J., and Paulos, E. Understanding conflict between landlords and tenants: implications for energy sensing and feedback. In Proc. Ubicomp '10. ACM (2010), 149--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dillahunt, T., Mankoff, J., Paulos, E., and Fussell, S. It's not all about "Green": energy use in low-income communities. In Proc. Ubicomp '09. ACM (2009), 255--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. DiSalvo, C., Sengers, P., and Brynjarsdóttir, H. Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI. In Proc. CHI '10. ACM (2010), 1975--1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dourish, P. HCI and environmental sustainability: the politics of design and the design of politics. In Proc. DIS '10. ACM (2010), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Foster, D., Blythe, M., Cairns, P., and Lawson, S. Competitive carbon counting: can social networking sites make saving energy more enjoyable? In Proc. CHI EA '10. ACM (2010), 4039--4044. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Grigsby, M. Buying Time and Getting By. The Voluntary Simplicity Movement. SUNY Press, Albany, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gustafsson, A., Bång, M., and Svahn, M. Power explorer: a casual game style for encouraging long term behavior change among teenagers. In Proc. ACE '09. ACM (2009), 182--189. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hallnäs, L., and Redström, J. Slow technology: designing for reflection. PUC. 5, 3 (2001), 201--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hirsch, T. Water wars: designing a civic game about water scarcity. In Proc. DIS '10. ACM (2010), 340--343. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Hirsch, T., and Anderson, K. Cross currents: water scarcity and sustainable CHI. In Proc. CHI EA'10. ACM (2010), 2843--2852. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Huang, E. M., and Truong, K. N. Breaking the disposable technology paradigm: opportunities for sustainable interaction design for mobile phones. In Proc. CHI '08. ACM (2008), 323--332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Leshed, G., and Sengers, P. "I lie to myself that I have freedom in my own schedule": productivity tools and experiences of busyness. In Proc. CHI '11. ACM (2011), 905--914. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ljungblad, S, and Holmquist, L. E. Transfer scenarios: grounding innovation with marginal practices. In Proc. CHI '07. ACM (2007), 737--746. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Meyers, E. M., and Bittner, R. "Green Washing" the Digital Playground: How Virtual Worlds Support Ecological Intelligence... or Do They? In Proc. iConference'12, ACM (2012), 608--610. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Nathan, L. Ecovillages: Information Tools and Deeply Sustainable Living. In P. K. Kahn & P. H. Hasbach (Eds.), Ecopsychology: Science, Totems, and the Technological Species (173--194). MIT Press (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Odom, W., Pierce, J., Stolterman, E., and Blevis, E. Understanding why we preserve some things and discard others in the context of interaction design. In Proc. CHI '09. ACM (2009), 1053--1062. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Pierce, J. Undesigning technology: considering the negation of design by design. In Proc. CHI '12. ACM (2012), 957--966. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Pierce, J., and Paulos, E. Second-hand interactions: investigating reacquisition and dispossession practices around domestic objects. In Proc. CHI '11. ACM (2011), 2385--2394. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Satchell, C. and Dourish. P. Beyond the user: use and non-use in HCI. Proc. OzCHI '09. ACM (2009), 9--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Schor, J. The overspent American: upscaling, downshifting, and the new consumer. Basic Books, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Strengers, Y. Designing Eco-Feedback Systems for Everyday Life. In Proc. CHI'11, ACM (2011), 2135--2144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Woodruff, A., Hasbrouck, J., and Augustin, S. A bright green perspective on sustainable choices. In Proc. CHI'08. ACM (2008), 313--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Beyond being green: simple living families and ICT

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader