skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2481406acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Investigating self-reporting behavior in long-term studies

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Self-reporting techniques, such as data logging or a diary, are frequently used in long-term studies, but prone to subjects' forgetfulness and other sources of inaccuracy. We conducted a six-week self-reporting study on smartphone usage in order to investigate the accuracy of self-reported information, and used logged data as ground truth to compare the subjects' reports against. Subjects never recorded more than 70% and, depending on the requested reporting interval, down to less than 40% of actual app usages. They significantly overestimated how long they used apps. While subjects forgot self-reports when no automatic reminders were sent, a high reporting frequency was perceived as uncomfortable and burdensome. Most significantly, self-reporting even changed the actual app usage of users and hence can lead to deceptive measures if a study relies on no other data sources.

With this contribution, we provide empirical quantitative long-term data on the reliability of self-reported data collected with mobile devices. We aim to make researchers aware of the caveats of self-reporting and give recommendations for maximizing the reliability of results when conducting large-scale, long-term app usage studies.

References

  1. Barkhuus, L., and Polichar, V. E. Empowerment through Seamfulness: Smart Phones in Everyday Life. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 15, 6 (2010), 629--639. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Barrett, L. F., and Barrett, D. J. An Introduction to Computerized Experience Sampling in Psychology. Social Science Computer Review 19, 2 (2001), 175--185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Böhmer, M., Hecht, B., Schöning, J., Krüger, A., and Bauer, G. Falling asleep with Angry Birds, Facebook and Kindle: A Large Scale Study on Mobile Application Usage. In Proc. of the 13th Intl. Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, ACM (Stockholm, Sweden, 2011), 47--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bolger, N., Davis, A., and Rafaeli, E. Diary Methods: Capturing Life as it is Lived. Annual Review of Psychology 54 (2003), 579--616.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Carter, S., and Mankoff, J. When Participants do the Capturing: the Role of Media in Diary Studies. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (Portland, OR, USA, 2005), 899--908. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Carter, S., Mankoff, J., and Heer, J. Momento: Support for Situated Ubicomp Experimentation. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (San Jose, CA, USA, 2007), 125--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Consolvo, S., Harrison, B., Smith, I., Chen, M., Everitt, K., Froehlich, J., and Landay, J. A. Conducting In Situ Evaluations for and with Ubiquitous Computing Technologies. Intl. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 22, 1-2 (2007), 103--118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Deane, F. P., Podd, J., and Henderson, R. D. Relationship between Self-Report and Log Data Estimates of Information System Usage. Computers in Human Behavior 14, 4 (1998), 621--636.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Demumieux, R., and Losquin, P. Gather Customer's Real Usage on Mobile Phones. In Proc. of the 7th Intl. Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, ACM (Salzburg, Austria, 2005), 267--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Eagle, N., Pentland, A. S., and Lazer, D. Inferring Friendship Network Structure by using Mobile Phone Data. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 36 (2009), 15274--15278.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Falaki, H., Mahajan, R., Kandula, S., Lymberopoulos, D., Govindan, R., and Estrin, D. Diversity in Smartphone Usage. In Proc. of the 8th Intl. Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 179--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Froehlich, J., Chen, M. Y., Consolvo, S., Harrison, B., and Landay, J. A. MyExperience: A System For In Situ Tracing and Capturing of User Feedback on Mobile Phones. In Proc. of the 5th Intl. Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services, ACM (San Juan, Puerto Rico, 2007), 57--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hartley, C., Brecht, M., Pagerey, P., Weeks, G., Chapanis, A., and Hoecker, D. Subjective Time Estimates of Work Tasks by Office Workers. Journal of Occupational Psychology 50, 1 (2011), 23--36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Henze, N., Rukzio, E., and Boll, S. Observational and Experimental Investigation of Typing Behaviour Using Virtual Keyboards for Mobile Devices. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (Austin, TX, USA, 2012), 2659--2668. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hufford, M. R., and Shields, A. L. Electronic Diaries: Applications and What Works in the Field. Applied Clinical Trials (2002), 46--59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hulkko, S., Mattelmäki, T., Virtanen, K., and Keinonen, T. Mobile Probes. In Proc. of the 3rd Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, ACM (Tampere, Finland, 2004), 43--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jansen, B. J., Taksa, I., and Spink, A. Handbook of Research on Web Log Analysis. IGI Global, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Jeon, M. H., Na, D. Y., Ahn, J. H., and Hong, J. Y. User segmentation & UI Optimization Through Mobile Phone Log Analysis. In Proc. of the 10th Intl. Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, ACM Press (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008), 495--496. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kärkkäinen, T., Vaittinen, T., and Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. I Don't Mind Being Logged, But Want to Remain in Control: A Field Study of Mobile Activity and Context Logging. In Proc. of the 28th Intl. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (Atlanta, GA, USA, 2010), 163--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Krumm, J. Ubiquitous Computing Fundamentals. Chapman & Hall / CRC, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lazar, J., Feng, J. H., and Hochheiser, H. Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lester, J., Choudhury, T., and Borriello, G. A Practical Approach to Recognizing Physical Activities. Pervasive Computing (2006), 1--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Mankoff, J., and Carter, S. Crossing Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation in the Domain of Ubiquitous Computing. In CHI2005 Workshop "Usage analysis: Combining Logging and Qualitative Methods" (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Möller, A., Michahelles, F., Diewald, S., Roalter, L., and Kranz, M. Update Behavior in App Markets and Security Implications: A Case Study in Google Play. In Proc. of the 3rd Intl. Workshop on Research in the Large. Held in Conjunction with Mobile HCI (2012), 3--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Nielsen, J. Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Palen, L., and Salzman, M. Voice-Mail Diary Studies for Naturalistic Data Capture Under Mobile Conditions. In Proc. of the 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM (New Orleans, LA, USA, 2002), 87--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Raento, M., Oulasvirta, A., Petit, R., and Toivonen, H. ContextPhone: A Prototyping Platform for Context-Aware Mobile Applications. Pervasive Computing, IEEE 4, 2 (2005), 51--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Robinson, J. P., and Godbey, G. Time For Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time. Penn State University Press, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Siek, K. A., Connelly, K. H., Rogers, Y., Rohwer, P., Lambert, D., and Welch, J. L. When Do We Eat? An Evaluation of Food Items Input Into an Electronic Food Monitoring Application. In Pervasive Health Conference and Workshops, 2006, IEEE (2006), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Investigating self-reporting behavior in long-term studies

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader