skip to main content
10.1145/2484028.2484067acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Opportunity model for e-commerce recommendation: right product; right time

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 July 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Most of existing e-commerce recommender systems aim to recommend the right product to a user, based on whether the user is likely to purchase or like a product. On the other hand, the effectiveness of recommendations also depends on the time of the recommendation. Let us take a user who just purchased a laptop as an example. She may purchase a replacement battery in 2 years (assuming that the laptop's original battery often fails to work around that time) and purchase a new laptop in another 2 years. In this case, it is not a good idea to recommend a new laptop or a replacement battery right after the user purchased the new laptop. It could hurt the user's satisfaction of the recommender system if she receives a potentially right product recommendation at the wrong time. We argue that a system should not only recommend the most relevant item, but also recommend at the right time.

This paper studies the new problem: how to recommend the right product at the right time? We adapt the proportional hazards modeling approach in survival analysis to the recommendation research field and propose a new opportunity model to explicitly incorporate time in an e-commerce recommender system. The new model estimates the joint probability of a user making a follow-up purchase of a particular product at a particular time. This joint purchase probability can be leveraged by recommender systems in various scenarios, including the zero-query pull-based recommendation scenario (e.g. recommendation on an e-commerce web site) and a proactive push-based promotion scenario (e.g. email or text message based marketing). We evaluate the opportunity modeling approach with multiple metrics. Experimental results on a data collected by a real-world e-commerce website(shop.com) show that it can predict a user's follow-up purchase behavior at a particular time with descent accuracy. In addition, the opportunity model significantly improves the conversion rate in pull-based systems and the user satisfaction/utility in push-based systems.

References

  1. M. Beal. Variational algorithms for approximate Bayesian inference. PhD thesis, University of London, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. Chen, D. Beeferman, and R. Rosenfeld. Evaluation metrics for language models. In DARPA Broadcast News Transcription and Understanding Workshop (BNTUW), Lansdowne, Virginia, USA, Feb. 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P. Cremonesi, Y. Koren, and R. Turrin. Performance of recommender algorithms on top-n recommendation tasks. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Recommender systems, pages 39--46, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Elkan. The foundations of cost-sensitive learning. In Proceedings of the 17th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2, IJCAI'01, pages 973--978, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. N. Golbandi, Y. Koren, and R. Lempel. Adaptive bootstrapping of recommender systems using decision trees. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM WSDM'11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Z. Huang, W. Chung, and H. Chen. A graph model for e-commerce recommender systems. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 55:259--274, February 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. R. Jin, L. Si, C. Zhai, and J. Callan. Collaborative filtering with decoupled models for preferences and ratings. In Proceedings of the twelfth CIKM, pages 309--316, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Y. S. Kim, B.-J. Yum, J. Song, and S. M. Kim. Development of a recommender system based on navigational and behavioral patterns of customers in e-commerce sites. Expert Syst. Appl., 28:381--393, February 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Y. Koren. Factorization meets the neighborhood: a multifaceted collaborative filtering model. In Proceeding of the 14th ACM SIGKDD KDD'08. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Y. Koren. Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics. In KDD, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. li Huang. Designing utility-based recommender systems for e-commerce: Evaluation of preference-elicitation methods. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. J. Mooney and L. Roy. Content-based book recommending using learning for text categorization. In DL '00, pages 195--204, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. Parra-Santander and P. Brusilovsky. Improving collaborative filtering in social tagging systems for the recommendation of scientific articles. Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, 1:136--142, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. C. D. R. Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistic Society, B(34):187--202, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S. Rendle, C. Freudenthaler, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Factorizing personalized markov chains for next-basket recommendation. In Proceedings of the 19th WWW. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. G. Shani, D. Heckerman, and R. I. Brafman. An mdp-based recommender system. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 6:1265--1295, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. E. Shmueli, A. Kagian, Y. Koren, and R. Lempel. Care to comment?: recommendations for commenting on news stories. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web, WWW '12, pages 429--438, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J. Wang, B. Sarwar, and N. Sundaresan. Utilizing related products for post-purchase recommendation in e-commerce. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Recommender systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. Wang and Y. Zhang. Utilizing marginal net utility for recommendation in e-commerce. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM SIGIR'11, pages 1003--1012, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J. Wang, Y. Zhang, and T. Chen. Unified recommendation and search in e-commerce. In Information Retrieval Technology, pages 296--305. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. J. Wang, Y. Zhang, C. Posse, and A. Bhasin. Is it time for a career switch? Proceedings of the 22nd International World Wide Web Conference, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. L. J. Wei. The accelerated failure time model: A useful alternative to the cox regression model in survival analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 11(14--15):1871--1879, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. L. Xiang, Q. Yuan, S. Zhao, L. Chen, X. Zhang, Q. Yang, and J. Sun. Temporal recommendation on graphs via long- and short-term preference fusion. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD KDD'10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. G. Zhao, M. L. Lee, W. Hsu, and W. Chen. Increasing temporal diversity with purchase intervals. In Proceedings of the 35th ACM SIGIR. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Opportunity model for e-commerce recommendation: right product; right time

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '13: Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
      July 2013
      1188 pages
      ISBN:9781450320344
      DOI:10.1145/2484028

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 July 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGIR '13 Paper Acceptance Rate73of366submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader