skip to main content
10.1145/2487575.2487597acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Inferring social roles and statuses in social networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 August 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Users in online social networks play a variety of social roles and statuses. For example, users in Twitter can be represented as advertiser, content contributor, information receiver, etc; users in Linkedin can be in different professional roles, such as engineer, salesperson and recruiter. Previous research work mainly focuses on using categorical and textual information to predict the attributes of users. However, it cannot be applied to a large number of users in real social networks, since much of such information is missing, outdated and non-standard. In this paper, we investigate the social roles and statuses that people act in online social networks in the perspective of network structures, since the uniqueness of social networks is connecting people. We quantitatively analyze a number of key social principles and theories that correlate with social roles and statuses. We systematically study how the network characteristics reflect the social situations of users in an online society. We discover patterns of homophily, the tendency of users to connect with users with similar social roles and statuses. In addition, we observe that different factors in social theories influence the social role/status of an individual user to various extent, since these social principles represent different aspects of the network. We then introduce an optimization framework based on Factor Conditioning Symmetry, and we propose a probabilistic model to integrate the optimization framework on local structural information as well as network influence to infer the unknown social roles and statuses of online users. We will present experiment results to show the effectiveness of the inference.

References

  1. C. C. Aggarwal. Social Network Data Analytics. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 1st edition, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. C. C. Aggarwal, Y. Zhao, and P. S. Yu. On text clustering with side information. ICDE '12, pages 894--904. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. C. C. Aggarwal, Y. Zhao, and P. S. Yu. Outlier detection in graph streams. ICDE '11, pages 399--409, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. L. Backstrom and J. Leskovec. Supervised random walks: predicting and recommending links in social networks. In WSDM '11, pages 635--644, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. R. Burt. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. E. David and K. Jon. Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning About a Highly Connected World. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. De Choudhury, W. A. Mason, J. M. Hofman, and D. J. Watts. Inferring relevant social networks from interpersonal communication. In WWW '10, pages 301--310, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Granovetter. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91(3):481--510, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. S. Guo, M. Wang, and J. Leskovec. The role of social networks in online shopping: information passing, price of trust, and consumer choice. In EC '11, pages 157--166, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. K. Henderson, B. Gallagher, T. Eliassi-Rad, H. Tong, S. Basu, L. Akoglu, D. Koutra, C. Faloutsos, and L. Li. Rolx: structural role extraction & mining in large graphs. KDD '12, pages 1231--1239. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. X. Hu and H. Liu. Social status and role analysis of palin's email network. In WWW '12 Companion, pages 531--532, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. D. Koller and N. Friedman. Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques - Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning. The MIT Press, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. G. Kossinets and D. Watts. Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. Science, 311(5757):88--90, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. J. Leskovec, L. A. Adamic, and B. A. Huberman. The dynamics of viral marketing. ACM Trans. Web, 1(1), May 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. Leuski. Email is a stage: discovering people roles from email archives. In SIGIR '04, pages 502--503, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. D. Liben-Nowell and J. Kleinberg. The link prediction problem for social networks. In CIKM '03, pages 556--559, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. H.-T. Lin, C.-J. Lin, and R. C. Weng. A note on platt's probabilistic outputs for support vector machines. Mach. Learn., 68(3):267--276, Oct. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. McCallum, X. Wang, and A. Corrada-Emmanuel. Topic and role discovery in social networks with experiments on enron and academic email. J. Artif. Int. Res., 30(1):249--272, Oct. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. M. McPherson, L. S. Lovin, and J. M. Cook. Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1):415--444, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. A. Mislove, B. Viswanath, K. P. Gummadi, and P. Druschel. You are who you know: inferring user profiles in online social networks. In WSDM '10, pages 251--260, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. A. Myers and J. Leskovec. On the convexity of latent social network inference. In J. D. Lafferty, C. K. I. Williams, J. Shawe-Taylor, R. S. Zemel, and A. Culotta, editors, NIPS '10, pages 1741--1749. Curran Associates, Inc., 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. P. Singla and M. Richardson. Yes, there is a correlation: - from social networks to personal behavior on the web. In WWW '08, pages 655--664, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. C. Tan, L. Lee, J. Tang, L. Jiang, M. Zhou, and P. Li. User-level sentiment analysis incorporating social networks. In KDD '11, pages 1397--1405, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. J. Tang, T. Lou, and J. Kleinberg. Inferring social ties across heterogenous networks. In WSDM '12, pages 743--752, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. J. Tang, J. Sun, C. Wang, and Z. Yang. Social influence analysis in large-scale networks. In KDD '09, pages 807--816, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. H. Tischler. Introduction to sociology. Wadsworth Publishing Company, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. G. Wang, Y. Zhao, X. Shi, and P. S. Yu. Magnet community identification on social networks. KDD '12, pages 588--596. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. H. T. Welser, D. Cosley, G. Kossinets, A. Lin, F. Dokshin, G. Gay, and M. Smith. Finding social roles in wikipedia. In iConference '11, pages 122--129, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. S. Wu, J. M. Hofman, W. A. Mason, and D. J. Watts. Who says what to whom on twitter. In WWW '11, pages 705--714, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. T.-F. Wu, C.-J. Lin, and R. C. Weng. Probability estimates for multi-class classification by pairwise coupling. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 5:975--1005, Dec. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Y. Zhao, C. C. Aggarwal, and P. S. Yu. On graph stream clustering with side information. In SDM, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Y. Zhao, X. Kong, and P. S. Yu. Positive and unlabeled learning for graph classification. ICDM '11, pages 962--971. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Y. Zhao, N. Sundaresan, Z. Shen, and P. S. Yu. Anatomy of a web-scale resale market: a data mining approach. WWW '13, pages 1533--1544. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. E. Zheleva and L. Getoor. To join or not to join: the illusion of privacy in social networks with mixed public and private user profiles. In WWW '09, pages 531--540, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Inferring social roles and statuses in social networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        KDD '13: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
        August 2013
        1534 pages
        ISBN:9781450321747
        DOI:10.1145/2487575

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 August 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        KDD '13 Paper Acceptance Rate125of726submissions,17%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

        Upcoming Conference

        KDD '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader