skip to main content
research-article

Privacy risk versus socialness in the decision to use mobile location-based applications

Published:24 June 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The adoption and use of mobile location-based applications (LBAs) (e.g. Loopt, Gowalla, Foursquare, Facebook Places, My Town) are far behind industry expectations. Drawing on social exchange theory, we present a theoretical framework to examine the cost-benefit tradeoffs considered by potential users of mobile LBAs. A research model is proposed and tested using data collected from a sample of 222 respondents. Our study offers two explanations for why users would release location information: 1) the application's controls reduce privacy risk beliefs, and 2) the application provides opportunities for socialness. Understanding the motivations and concerns of different types of users and developing LBAs to meet those specific needs is both a challenge and a condition for the growth of the location-based market.

References

  1. Aggarwal, P., and Law, S. (2005). Role of Relationship Norms in Processing Brand Information. Journal of Consumer Research, (32:3), 453--464.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Atkinson, M. & Kydd, C. (1997). Individual Characteristics Associated with World Wide Web Use: An Empirical Study of Playfulness and Motivation. Data Base for Advance in Information Systems, 28(2), 53--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Baker, J., Parasuraman, A., Grewal, D., & Voss, G. (2002). The Influence of Multiple Store Environment Cues on Perceived Merchandise Value and Patronage Intentions. Journal of Marketing, (66:2), 120--14Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Betancourt, L. (2010). Why hasn't Location Reached the Mainstream Yet? http://mashable.com/2010/5/13/location-mainstream.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chin, W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling: in Marcoulides, B., (ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi, D., & Kim, J. (2004). Why People Continue to Play Online Games: In Search of Critical Design Factors to Increases Customer Loyalty to Online Contents. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(1), 11--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Belknap Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 319--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, (35), 982--1003 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1992). Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111--1132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Dwyer, F., Schurr, P. & Oh, S. (1987). Developing the Buyer-Seller Relationship. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The Benefits of Facebook "Friends:" Social Capital and College Students Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143--1168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Emerson, R. (1981). Social Exchange Theory. In M. Rosenberg and R. H. Turner (eds.), Social Pschology: Sociological Perspectives. pp. 31--65, Basic Books, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Fishbein, M. & Ajzen I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, (48), 39--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Fusco, S.J., Michael, K., & Michael, M.G. (2010). Using a Social Informatics Framework to Study the Effects of Location-Based Social Networking on Relationships Between People: A Review of Literature. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society, June 7--9, Wallongong, Australia, 157--171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. (2000). Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice. Communications of the Association of Information Systems, 4(7), 1--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Gefen, D., & Ridings, C. (2002). Implementation Team Responsiveness and User Evaluation of Customer Relationship Management: A Quasi-Experimental Design Study of Social Exchange Theory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 47--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E. and Straub, D. (2003) Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51--91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Havelena, W. & DeSarbo, W. (1991). On the Measurement of Perceived Consumer Risk. Decision Sciences, 22(4), 927--939.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Heiser, J. & Bace, J. (2010). Tossing Your Cookies: The Privacy Implications of Context Aware Agents. Gartner Research. ID Number: G00206302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Henseler, J., Ringle, C., & Sinkovics, R. (2009). The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing, in Sinkovics, R., and Ghauri, P. (eds.), Advances in International Marketing, Vol. 20. Bingley, 277--320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Homans, G. (1961). Social Behavior. Harcourt, Brace & World, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S., & Baroudi, J. (1996). A Motivational Model of Microcomputer Usage. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(1), 127--143. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Jarvenpaa, S. & Staples, D. (2001). Exploring Perceptions of Organizational Ownership of Information and Expertise. Journal of Management Information Systems. 18(1), 151--183. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Jarvenpaa, S. & Todd P. (1996). Consumer Reactions to Electronic Shopping on the World Wide Web. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 1(2), 59--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Junglas, I. (2010). Homo Socialis- Or the Social Component of Information Systems. Under Review.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Karahanna, E. and Straub, D. W. (1999) The Psychological Origins of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease-of-Use. Information Management, 35, 237--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Kelley, H. & Thibaut, J. (1978). Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence. Wiley and Sons, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Koufaris, M., Kambil, A. & Labarbera, P. (2001). Consumer behavior in web-based commerce: an empirical study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(2), 115--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Krasnova, H., Spiekermann, S., Koroleva, K., & Hildebrand, T. (2010). Online Social Networks: Why We Disclose. Journal of Information Technology, 25, 109--125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Kumar, N. and Benbasat, I. (2006) The Influence of Recommendations and Consumer Reviews on Evaluations of Websites. Information Systems Research, 17(4), 425--442. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Malhotra, N., Kim, S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 336--355. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. McKnight, D., Kacmar C., & Choudhury, V. (2004). Dispositional Trust and Distrust Distinctions in Predicting Highand Low-Risk Internet Expert Advice Site Perceptions. e-Service Journal, 3(2), 35--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Moon, J., & Kim, Y. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web Context. Information and Management, 38(4), 217--230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Nunnally, J. (1978) Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Peter, J. & Tarpey, L. (1975). A Comparative Analysis of Three Consumer Decision Strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 29--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879--903.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Posey, C., Lowry, P., Roberts, T., & Ellis, S. (2010). Proposing the Online Community Self-Disclosure Model: The Case of Working Professionals in France and the U.K. who use Online Communities. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), 181--196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Rice, M. (1997). What Makes Users Revisit a Web Site? Marketing News, 31(6), 12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Rigdon, E., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2010). Structural Modeling of Heterogeneous Data wit Partial Least Squares, in Malhotra, N. (ed.), Review of Marketing Research, 7, Armonk.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Ringle, C., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 (beta). SmartPLS, Hamburg, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Ringle, C., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2010). Finite Mixture Partial Least Squares Analysis: Methodology and Numerical Examples. In V. Esposito Vinzi, WW. Chin, J. Henseler, and H. Wang (eds.) Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. (2010). Treating Unobserved Heterogeneity in PLS Path Modeling: A Comparison of FIMIX-PLS with Different Data Analysis Strategies, Journal of Applied Statistics, 37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as Information: Informational and Motivational Functions of Affective States, in Handbook of Motivation and Cognition Vol. 2, E. Torry Higgins and R.M. Sorrentino (eds.), Guilford, NY, 527--561.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Schwarz, N. and Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, Misattribution, and Judgments of Well-Being: Informative and Directive Functions of Affective States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (45), 513--523.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Scott, W. (2003). Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (5th Ed). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Sociable. (2011). In The Free Dictionary. Retrieved August 14, 2011, from http://thefreedictionary.com/sociable.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Son J., Narasimhan, S. & Riggins, F. (2005). Effects of Relational Factors and Channel Climate on EDI Usage in the Customer-Supplier Relationship. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1), 321--353. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Staples, D. & Webster, J. (2008). Exploring the Effects of Trust, Task Interdependence and Virtualness on Knowledge Sharing in Teams. Information Systems Journal, 18, 617--640.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Stewart, K., & Segars, A. (2002). An Empirical Examination of the Concern for Information Privacy Instrument. Information Systems Research, 13(1), 36--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Sun. H. (2010). Sellers' Trust and Continued Use of Online Marketplaces. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(4), 182--211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995) Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144--176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Van Der Heijden, H. (2004). User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695--704. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Venkatesh, V. (1999). Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 239--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research, 11, 342--365 . Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425--478. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Wakefield, R., Wakefield, K., Baker, J., & Wang, L. (2011). How Website Socialness Leads to Website Use. European Journal of Information Systems,20, 118--132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Wang, L., Baker, J., Wagner, J., & Wakefield, K. (2007) Can a Retail Web Site be Social? Journal of Marketing, 71, 143--157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Wilcox, H. (2010). Mobile Retail Market. www.juniperresearch.com, March.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Wyer, R. S., Clore, G. L., & Isbell, L. M. (1999). Affect and Information Processing, in Advances in Experimental Psychology, M. P. Zanna (ed), Academic Press, San Diego, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Xiao, B. and Benbasat, I. (2007). E-Commerce Product Recommendation Agents: Use, Characteristics, and Impact. MIS Quarterly, (31:1), 137--209. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Xu, H., Dinev, T., Smith, H., & Hart, P. (2008). Examining the Formation of Individual's Privacy Concerns: Toward an Integrative View. Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Information Systems, December 14--17, Paris, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Zafirovski, M. (2003). Some Amendment to Social Exchange Theory: A Sociological Perspective. Theory & Science, 4(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Privacy risk versus socialness in the decision to use mobile location-based applications

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader