skip to main content
column

Guest column: the quantum PCP conjecture

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 June 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The classical PCP theorem is arguably the most important achievement of classical complexity theory in the past quarter century. In recent years, researchers in quantum computational complexity have tried to identify approaches and develop tools that address the question: does a quantum version of the PCP theorem hold? The story of this study starts with classical complexity and takes unexpected turns providing fascinating vistas on the foundations of quantum mechanics and multipartite entanglement, topology and the so-called phenomenon of topological order, quantum error correction, information theory, and much more; it raises questions that touch upon some of the most fundamental issues at the heart of our understanding of quantum mechanics. At this point, the jury is still out as to whether or not such a theorem holds. This survey aims to provide a snapshot of the status in this ongoing story, tailored to a general theory-of-CS audience.

References

  1. S. A. Cook, "The complexity of theorem-proving procedures," in Proceedings of the third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pp. 151--158, ACM, 1971. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. L. A. Levin, "Universal sequential search problems," Problemy Peredachi Informatsii, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 115--116, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. S. Arora, C. Lund, R. Motwani, M. Sudan, and M. Szegedy, "Proof verification and the hardness of approximation problems," J. ACM, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 501--555, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Arora and S. Safra, "Probabilistic checking of proofs: A new characterization of NP," J. ACM, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 70--122, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. I. Dinur, "The PCP theorem by gap amplification," J. ACM, vol. 54, no. 3, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. Lund, L. Fortnow, H. Karloff, and N. Nisan, "Algebraic methods for interactive proof systems," J. ACM, vol. 39, pp. 859--868, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Shamir, "IP = PSPACE," J. ACM, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 869--877, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. L. Babai, L. Fortnow, and C. Lund, "Non-deterministic exponential time has two-prover interactive protocols," Comput. Complexity, vol. 1, pp. 3--40, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. L. Babai, "Trading group theory for randomness," in Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 421--429, ACM, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Goldwasser, S. Micali, and C. Rackoff, "The knowledge complexity of interactive proof systems," SIAM Journal on Computing, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 186--208, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. Arora and B. Barak, Computational complexity: a modern approach. Cambridge University Press Cambridge, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, October 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Kitaev, 1999. Lecture given at the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. A. Kitaev, A. Shen, and M. Vyalyi, Classical and Quantum Computation. American Mathematical Society, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. E. Knill, "Quantum randomness and nondeterminism," arXiv preprint quant-ph/9610012, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. D. Aharonov, W. van Dam, J. Kempe, Z. Landau, S. Lloyd, and O. Regev, "Adiabatic Quantum Computation is Equivalent to Standard Quantum Computation," in Proc. 45th FOCS, vol. 45, pp. 42--53, IEEE, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Kempe, A. Kitaev, and O. Regev, "The complexity of the local Hamiltonian problem," SIAM Journal on Computing, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1070--1097, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. R. Oliveira and B. M. Terhal, "The complexity of quantum spin systems on a two-dimensional square lattice," Quantum Information & Computation, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 900--924, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. D. Aharonov, D. Gottesman, S. Irani, and J. Kempe, "The power of quantum systems on a line," Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 287, no. 1, pp. 41--65, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. D. Gottesman and S. Irani, "The quantum and classical complexity of translationally invariant tiling and Hamiltonian problems," in Proc. 50th FOCS, pp. 95--104, IEEE, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. Bravyi, D. P. DiVincenzo, D. Loss, and B. M. Terhal, "Quantum simulation of many-body Hamiltonians using perturbation theory with bounded-strength interactions," Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 101, p. 070503, Aug 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. R. M. Karp, "Reducibility Among Combinatorial Problems," in Complexity of Computer Computations (R. E. Miller and J. W. Thatcher, eds.), pp. 85--103, Plenum Press, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. N. Schuch and F. Verstraete, "Computational complexity of interacting electrons and fundamental limitations of density functional theory," Nature Physics, vol. 5, pp. 732--735, Aug. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. D. Aharonov and T. Naveh, "Quantum NP -- a survey," arXiv preprint quant-ph/0210077, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. S. Aaronson, "The quantum PCP manifesto." http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=139, 2006. Blog entry.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. D. Aharonov, I. Arad, Z. Landau, and U. Vazirani, "The detectability lemma and quantum gap amplification," in Proc. 41st STOC, (New York, NY, USA), pp. 417--426, ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. M. B. Hastings, "Topological order at nonzero temperature," Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 107, p. 210501, Nov 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. M. Freedman and M. Hastings, "Quantum systems on non-k-hyperfinite complexes: A generalization of classical statistical mechanics on expander graphs," arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.1363, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. I. Arad, "A note about a partial no-go theorem for quantum PCP," Quantum Information & Computation, vol. 11, pp. 1019--1027, Nov. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. D. Aharonov and L. Eldar, "On the complexity of commuting local Hamiltonians, and tight conditions for topological order in such systems," in Proc. 52nd FOCS, pp. 334--343, IEEE, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. N. Schuch, "Complexity of commuting Hamiltonians on a square lattice of qubits," Quantum Information & Computation, vol. 11, no. 901, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. M. Hastings, "Trivial low energy states for commuting Hamiltonians, and the quantum PCP conjecture," Quantum Information & Computation, vol. 13, no. 5 & 6, pp. 393--429, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. S. Gharibian and J. Kempe, "Approximation algorithms for QMA-complete problems," in Computational Complexity (CCC), 2011 IEEE 26th Annual Conference on, pp. 178--188, IEEE, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. T. Vidick, "Three-player entangled XOR games are NP-hard to approximate," arXiv preprint arXiv:1302.1242, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. F. G. Brandao and A. W. Harrow, "Product-state approximations to quantum ground states," in Proc. 45th STOC, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. D. Aharonov and L. Eldar, "Commuting local Hamiltonians on expanders, locally testable quantum codes, and the qPCP conjecture," arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3407, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. M. B. Hastings, "Matrix product operators and central elements: Classical description of a quantum state," arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.1671, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. V. Guruswami and R. O'Donnell, "A history of the PCP theorem." Available at http://www.cs.washington.edu/education/courses/533/05au/pcp-history.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. A. Y. Kitaev, "Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons," Annals of Physics, vol. 303, no. 1, pp. 2--30, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. S. Bravyi and M. Vyalyi, "Commutative version of the local Hamiltonian problem and common eigenspace problem," Quantum Information & Computation, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 187--215, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. J. S. Bell, "On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox," Physics, vol. 1, pp. 195--200, 1964.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, "Experimental test of Bell's inequalities using timevarying analyzers," Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 49, pp. 1804--1807, Dec 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. R. P. Feynman, "Simulating physics with computers," International journal of theoretical physics, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 467--488, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. R. P. Feynman, "Quantum mechanical computers," Foundations of physics, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 507--531, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. I. Dinur and O. Reingold, "Assignment testers: Towards a combinatorial proof of the PCPtheorem," in Proc. 45th FOCS, pp. 155--164, IEEE, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. E. Ben-Sasson, O. Goldreich, P. Harsha, M. Sudan, and S. Vadhan, "Robust PCPs of proximity, shorter PCPs and applications to coding," in Proc. 36th STOC, pp. 1--10, ACM, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. W. K. Wootters and W. H. Zurek, "A single quantum cannot be cloned," Nature, vol. 299, no. 5886, pp. 802--803, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. P. Raghavendra and N. Tan, "Approximating CSPs with global cardinality constraints using SDP hierarchies," in Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 373--387, SIAM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. V. Coffman, J. Kundu, and W. K. Wootters, "Distributed entanglement," Phys. Rev. A, vol. 61, p. 052306, Apr 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. S. Hoory, N. Linial, and A. Wigderson, "Expander graphs and their applications," Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 439--561, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, "Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy," Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 82, pp. 277--306, Feb 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. S. Bravyi, M. B. Hastings, and F. Verstraete, "Lieb-Robinson bounds and the generation of correlations and topological quantum order," Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 97, p. 050401, Jul 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. E. Dennis, A. Kitaev, A. Landahl, and J. Preskill, "Topological quantum memory," Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 43, p. 4452, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. O. Goldreich, S. Micali, and A. Wigderson, "Proofs that yield nothing but their validity for all languages in NP have zero-knowledge proof systems," J. ACM, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 691--729, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Y.-K. Liu, "Consistency of local density matrices is QMA-complete," in Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques, pp. 438--449, Springer, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. A. Kitaev and J. Watrous, "Parallelization, amplification, and exponential time simulation of quantum interactive proof systems," in Proc. 32nd STOC, (New York, NY, USA), pp. 608--617, ACM, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. M. Vyalyi, "QMA=PP implies that PP contains PH," tech. rep., Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, Report TR03-021, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. C. Marriott and J. Watrous, "Quantum Arthur-Merlin games," Comput. Complexity, vol. 14, pp. 122--152, June 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. R. Cleve, P. Hoyer, B. Toner, and J. Watrous, "Consequences and limits of nonlocal strategies," in Proc. 19th IEEE Conf. on Computational Complexity (CCC'04), pp. 236--249, IEEE Computer Society, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. B. W. Reichardt, F. Unger, and U. Vazirani, "A classical leash for a quantum system: command of quantum systems via rigidity of CHSH games," in Proceedings of the 4th conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science, ITCS '13, (New York, NY, USA), pp. 321--322, ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. R. Jain, Z. Ji, S. Upadhyay, and J. Watrous, "QIP = PSPACE," in Proc. 42nd STOC, (New York, NY, USA), pp. 573--582, ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. T. Ito and T. Vidick, "A multi-prover interactive proof for NEXP sound against entangled provers," Proc. 53rd FOCS, pp. 243--252, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. L. Valiant and V. Vazirani, "NP is as easy as detecting unique solutions," Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 47, no. 0, pp. 85--93, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. S. Aaronson, "On perfect completeness for QMA," Quantum Information & Computation, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 81--89, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. M. Aguado and G. Vidal, "Entanglement renormalization and topological order," Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 100, p. 070404, Feb 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Guest column: the quantum PCP conjecture

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM SIGACT News
        ACM SIGACT News  Volume 44, Issue 2
        June 2013
        142 pages
        ISSN:0163-5700
        DOI:10.1145/2491533
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2013 Authors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 June 2013

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • column

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader