skip to main content
10.1145/2492517.2492657acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evolution of communities on Twitter and the role of their leaders during emergencies

Published:25 August 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Twitter is presently utilized as a channel of communication and information dissemination. At present, government and non-government emergency management organizations utilize Twitter to disseminate emergency relevant information. However, these organizations have limited ability to evaluate the Twitter communication in order to discover communication patterns, key players, and messages that are being propagated through Twitter regarding the event. More importantly there is a general lack of knowledge of who are the individuals or organizations that disseminate warning information, provide confirmations of an event and associated actions, and urge others to take action. This paper presents a methodology that shows how Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Social Network Analysis (SNA) can aid in addressing these issues. The methodology, in addition to qualitative data collected during on-site interviews and publicly available information, was successfully applied to a Twitter data set collected during 2011 Japan tsunami. NLP techniques were applied to extract actionable messages. Based on the messages extracted by NLP, SNA was used to construct a network of actionable messages. While SNA discovered communities and extracted the community leaders, NLP was used to determine the behavior of the community members and the role of the community leaders. Therefore, the proposed methodology automatically finds communities, evaluates its members' behaviors, and authenticates cohesive behaviors of the community members during emergencies. Moreover, the methodology efficiently finds the leaders of the communities, while also identifying their role in communities.

References

  1. Y. Tyshchuk and W. A. Wallace, "Actionable information during extreme events - case study: Warnings and 2011 tohoku earthquake," in SocialCom/PASSAT, 2012, pp. 338--347. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. Mileti and J. Sorensen, "Communiction of emergency public warnings: A social science perspective and state-of-the-art assessement," in State-of-the-Art Assessement. Report prepared for Federal Emergency Management Agency. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Lindell and R. Perry, "The protective action decision model: Theoretical modifications and additional evidence," in Risk Analysis, 2012, p. 32 (4): 616--632.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. A. Hughes and L. Palen, "Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events," in In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM). Gothenburg, Sweden, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D. Yates and S. Paquette, "Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: A case study of the 2010 haitian earthquake," International Journal of Information Management, p. 31 (1): 6?3, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. K. Starbird and L. Palen, ""voluntweeters": self-organizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis," in CHI, 2011, pp. 1071--1080. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Sarcevic, L. Palen, J. White, K. Starbird, M. Bagdouri, and K. M. Anderson, ""beacons of hope" in decentralized coordination: learning from on-the-ground medical twitterers during the 2010 haiti earthquake," in CSCW, 2012, pp. 47--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. D. M. Romero and J. M. Kleinberg, "The directed closure process in hybrid social-information networks, with an analysis of link formation on twitter," in ICWSM, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. M. Romero, B. Meeder, and J. M. Kleinberg, "Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion across topics: idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion on twitter," in WWW, 2011, pp. 695--704. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. B. A. Huberman, D. M. Romero, and F. Wu, "Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope," First Monday, vol. 14, no. 1, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. H. Ji and R. Grishman, "Refining event extraction through cross-document inference," in ACL, 2008, pp. 254--262.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. H. Li, H. Ji, H. Deng, and J. Han, "Exploiting background information networks to enhance bilingual event extraction through topic modeling," in Proc. of International Conference on Advances in Information Mining and Management, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Y. Yang, T. Pierce, and J. G. Carbonell, "A study of retrospective and on-line event detection," in SIGIR, 1998, pp. 28--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. M. Kleinberg, "Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams," Data Min. Knowl. Discov., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 373--397, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. H. Li, X. Li, H. Ji, and Y. Marton, "Domain-independent novel event discovery and semi-automatic event annotation," in PACLIC, 2010, pp. 233--242.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Q. He, K. Chang, and E.-P. Lim, "Analyzing feature trajectories for event detection." in SIGIR, W. Kraaij, A. P. de Vries, C. L. A. Clarke, N. Fuhr, and N. Kando, Eds. ACM, 2007, pp. 207--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Weng and B.-S. Lee, "Event detection in twitter," in ICWSM, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. E. Benson, A. Haghighi, and R. Barzilay, "Event discovery in social media feeds," in ACL, 2011, pp. 389--398. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. LDC, "Ace (automatic content extraction) english annotation guidelines for events (http://projects.ldc.upenn.edu/ace/docs/english-events-guidelines v5.4.3.pdf)," 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin, "Libsvm: A library for support vector machines," ACM TIST, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 27, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. F. J. Och and H. Ney, "A systematic comparison of various statistical alignment models," Computational Linguistics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 19--51, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. A. Lancichinetti, F. Radicchi, J. J. Ramasco, and S. Fortunato, "Finding statistically significant communities in networks," PloS one, vol. 6, no. 4, p. e18961, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. S. Fortunato, "Community detection in graphs," Physics Reports, vol. 486, no. 3, pp. 75--174, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. P. Pons and M. Latapy, "Computing communities in large networks using random walks," J. Graph Algorithms Appl., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 191--218, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. R. Burt, N. Lin, and K. Cook, "Structural holes versus network closure as social capital," in In Social Captial: Theory and Research. Aldine Transaction, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. R. Reagans and B. McEvily, "Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range," in Administrative Science Quarterly, 2003, p. 48 (2)(June): 240?67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. S. Wasserman and K. Faust, "Social network analysis: Methods and applications," Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. P. Bonacich, "Power and centrality: A family of measures," American Journal of Sociology, vol. 92, pp. 1170--1182, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. L. C. Freeman, "Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification," Social networks, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 215--239, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. L. C. Freeman, "The gatekeeper, pair-dependency and structural centrality," Quality and Quantity, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 585--592, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. D. Conway, "Social network analysis in r."Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. L. Ewing, "The tohoku tsunami of march 11, 2011: A preliminary report on effects to the california coast and planning implications," in California Coastal Commission Report. San Francisco, CA: State of California -- Natural Resources Agency, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. C. Blair, "Update: Hawaii tsunami damage in "tens of millions" of dollars," in Honolulu Civil Beat, March 14, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Evolution of communities on Twitter and the role of their leaders during emergencies

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            ASONAM '13: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining
            August 2013
            1558 pages
            ISBN:9781450322409
            DOI:10.1145/2492517

            Copyright © 2013 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 25 August 2013

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate116of549submissions,21%

            Upcoming Conference

            KDD '24

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader