skip to main content
10.1145/2493394.2493412acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicerConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Can first-year students program yet?: a study revisited

Published:12 August 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

The McCracken et al. working group paper is often cited for the proposition that students can't program. In that study, students from four different institutions were each assigned to implement one of three versions of a calculator. More than half of the students failed to produce a program that compiled and executed in the time assigned.

Lost in this discussion, however, is the fact that the original paper had the goal of evaluating its instrument, as well as the students. We examine and adjust their instrument, and present the results of the revised study. With a modifed instrument, we have obtained significantly improved results.

References

  1. T. Clear, J. Whalley, P. Robbins, A. Philpott, A. Eckerdal, M. Laakso, and R. Lister. Report on the final BRACElet workshop: Auckland University of Technology, September 2010. J. Applied Computing and Information Technology, 15, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. P. Denny, A. Luxton-Reilly, and B. Simon. Evaluating a new exam question: Parsons problems. In Proc. of the Fourth international Workshop on Computing Education Research, ICER '08, pages 113--124. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. Lister. Ten years after the McCracken Working Group. ACM Inroads, 2(4):18--19, Dec. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R. Lister, E. S. Adams, S. Fitzgerald, W. Fone, J. Hamer, M. Lindholm, R. McCartney, J. E. Moström, K. Sanders, O. Seppälä, B. Simon, and L. Thomas. A multi-national study of reading and tracing skills in novice program mers. SIGCSE Bull., 36(4):119--150, June 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. McCracken. Evaluation of programs for the iticse working group on programming skill assessment, May 2001. http://www.cc.gatech.edu/projects/iticsewg/evaluation.pdf. (Accessed on March 3,2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. McCracken, V. Almstrum, D. Diaz, M. Guzdial, D. Hagan, Y. B.-D. Kolikant, C. Laxer, L. Thomas, I. Utting, and T. Wilusz. A multi-national, multi-institutional study of assessment of programming skills of first-year cs students. SIGCSE Bull., 33(4):125--180, Dec. 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Meyer and R. Land. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. ETL Project Occasional Report 4, School of Education, University of Edinburgh, UK, 2003. http://www.ed.ac.uk/etl/docs/ETLreport4.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. Perkins. The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership, 57(3):6--11, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J. Sajaniemi. An empirical analysis of roles of variables in novice-level procedural programs. In Proc. IEEE 2002 Symp. on Human Centric Computing Languages and Environments, pages 37--39, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. B. Simon, T.-Y. Chen, G. Lewandowski, R. McCartney, and K. Sanders. Commonsense computing: what students know before we teach (episode 1: sorting). In Proc. of the second international workshop on Computing education research, ICER '06, pages 29--40. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. L. Smith and J. Cordova. Weighted primary trait analysis for computer program evaluation. J. Comput. Sci. Coll., 20(6):14--19, June 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Sweller. Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12:257--285, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Can first-year students program yet?: a study revisited

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICER '13: Proceedings of the ninth annual international ACM conference on International computing education research
      August 2013
      202 pages
      ISBN:9781450322430
      DOI:10.1145/2493394

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 August 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      ICER '13 Paper Acceptance Rate22of70submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate189of803submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      ICER 2024
      ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
      August 13 - 15, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader