skip to main content
10.1145/2493432.2493489acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Learning from a learning thermostat: lessons for intelligent systems for the home

Published:08 September 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Everyday systems and devices in the home are becoming smarter. In order to better understand the challenges of deploying an intelligent system in the home, we studied the experience of living with an advanced thermostat, the Nest. The Nest utilizes machine learning, sensing, and networking technology, as well as eco-feedback features. We conducted interviews with 23 participants, ten of whom also participated in a three-week diary study. Our findings show that while the Nest was well-received overall, the intelligent features of the Nest were not perceived to be as useful or intuitive as expected, in particular due to the system's inability to understand the intent behind sensed behavior and users' difficulty in understanding how the Nest works. A number of participants developed workarounds for the shortcomings they encountered. Based on our observations, we propose three avenues for future development of interactive intelligent technologies for the home: exception flagging, incidental intelligibility, and constrained engagement.

References

  1. Bellotti, V., and Edwards, W. Intelligibility and accountability: human considerations in context-aware systems. Human--Computer Interaction 16, 2--4 (2001), 193--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Brush, A., et al. Home automation in the wild: challenges and opportunities. In Proc. CHI 2011, 2115--2124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cook, D.J., et al. MavHome: An agent-based smart home. PerCom 2003, 521--524. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Dey, A.K., Rosenthal, S., and Veloso, M. Using Interaction to Improve Intelligence: How Intelligent Systems Should Ask Users for Input. Presented at the Workshop on Intelligence and Interaction: IJCAI 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Edwards, W.K and Grinter, R.E. At home with ubiquitous computing: seven challenges. In Proc. Ubicomp 2001, 256--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Review, September 27, 2012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., and Landay, J. The design of eco-feedback technology. In Proc. CHI 2010, 1999--2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gupta, M., Intille, S., and Larson, K. Adding gps-control to traditional thermostats: An exploration of potential energy savings and design challenges. In Proc. Pervasive 2009, 95--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Intille, S.S. Designing a home of the future. IEEE Pervasive Computing 1, 2 (2002), 76--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kidd, C., et al. The aware home: A living laboratory for ubiquitous computing research. In Proc. CoBuild 1999, 191--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kulesza, T., et al. Fixing the program my computer learned: Barriers for end users, challenges for the machine. In Proc. IUI 2009, 187--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lim, B.Y., Dey, A.K., and Avrahami, D. Why and why not explanations improve the intelligibility of context-aware intelligent systems. In Proc. CHI 2009, 2119--2128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Mackay, W.E. Responding to cognitive overload: Co-adaptation between users and technology. Intellectica 30, 1 (2000), 177--193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mennicken, S. and Huang, E. Hacking the natural habitat: an in-the-wild study of smart homes, their development, and the people who live in them. In Proc. Pervasive 2012, 143--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Mozer, M.C. Lessons from an Adaptive Home. In D.J. Cook and S.K. Das, eds., Smart Environments. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005, 271--294.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. O'Brien, J., et al. At home with the technology: an ethnographic study of a set-top-box trial. ACM ToCHI 6, 3 (1999), 282--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Orlikowski, W.J. The Duality of Technology. Organization science 3, 3 (1992), 398--427.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Peffer, T., et al. How people use thermostats in homes: A review. Building and Environment, (2011).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Poole, E.S., et al. Computer help at home: methods and motivations for informal technical support. In Proc. CHI 2009, 739--748. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Rode, J.A., Toye, E.F., and Blackwell, A.F. The fuzzy felt ethnography--understanding the programming patterns of domestic appliances. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 8, 3--4 (2004), 161--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Rogers, Y. Moving on from Weiser's vision of calm computing : engaging UbiComp experiences. In Proc. Ubicomp 2006, 404--42 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Scott, J., et al. PreHeat: controlling home heating using occupancy prediction. Proc. Ubicomp 2011, 281--290. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Strengers, Y.A.A. Designing eco-feedback systems for everyday life. In Proc. CHI 2011, 2135--2144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Stumpf, S., et al. Interacting meaningfully with machine learning systems: Three experiments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67, 8 (2009), 639--662. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Suchman, L. Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Takayama, L., et al. Making Technology Homey: Finding Sources of Satisfaction and Meaning in Home Automation. In Proc. Ubicomp 2012, 511--520 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Tullio, J., et al. How it works: a field study of non-technical users interacting with an intelligent system. In Proc. CHI 2007, 31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Weiser, M. The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American 265, 3 (1991), 94--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Yang, R. and Newman, M.W. Living with an intelligent thermostat: Advanced control for heating and cooling systems. Presented at the HomeSys 2012 Workshop: Ubicomp 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Smart Digital Appliances You Wish You Owned - CNBC. http://www.cnbc.com/id/46807536.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Nest | Home. http://www.nest.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Nest | Reviews. http://nest.com/reviews/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Catch.com. https://catch.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Learning from a learning thermostat: lessons for intelligent systems for the home

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '13: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing
      September 2013
      846 pages
      ISBN:9781450317702
      DOI:10.1145/2493432

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 September 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      UbiComp '13 Paper Acceptance Rate92of394submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader