skip to main content
10.1145/2494091.2495977acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Synthesizing daily life logs through gaming and simulation

Published:08 September 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the recent years there has been a growing interest in the design and implementation of smart homes, and smart buildings in general. The evaluation of approaches in this area typically requires massive datasets of measurements from deployed sensors in real prototypes. While a few datasets obtained by real smart homes are freely available, they are not sufficient for comparing different approaches and techniques in a variety of configurations. In this work, we propose a smart home dataset generation strategy based on a simulated environment populated with virtual autonomous agents, sensors and devices which allow to customize and reproduce a smart space using a series of useful parameters. The simulation is based on declarative process models for modeling habits performed by agents, an action theory for realizing low-level atomic actions, and a 3D virtual execution environment. We show how different configurations generate a variety of sensory logs that can be used as input to a state-of-the-art activity recognition technique in order to evaluate its performance under parametrized scenarios, as well as provide guidelines for actually building real smart homes.

References

  1. Araujo, F., Al-Zinati, M., Valente, J., Kuiper, D., and Zalila-Wenkstern, R. Divas 4.0: A framework for the development of situated multi-agent based simulation systems. In 12th Intl. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ashton, K. That \internet of things" thing. RFID Journal (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Atallah, L., and Yang, G.-Z. The use of pervasive sensing for behaviour profiling: a survey. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 5, 5 (2009), 447--464. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cook, D. Learning setting-generalized activity models for smart spaces. IEEE intelligent systems (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Di Ciccio, C., and Mecella, M. Mining constraints for artful processes. In BIS (2012), 11--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Diekert, V., and Gastin, P. First-order definable languages. In Logic and Automata (2008), 261--306.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Fikes, R., and Nilsson, N. Strips: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial intelligence 2, 3 (1972), 189--208.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fox, M., and Long, D. Pddl2.1: An extension to pddl for expressing temporal planning domains. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 20 (2003), 61--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Helal, A., Mendez-Vazquez, A., and Hossain, S. Specification and synthesis of sensory datasets in pervasive spaces. In IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (2009), 920--925.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Krishnan, N., and Cook, D. Activity recognition on streaming sensor data. Pervasive and Mobile Computing (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Menon, V., Jayaraman, B., and Govindaraju, V. Multimodal identification and tracking in smart environments. Pers. and Ubiquitous Comp. (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Merico, D., and Bisiani, R. An agent-based data-generation tool for situation-aware systems. In 7th Intl. Conf. on Intelligent Environments (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Nishikawa, H., Yamamoto, S., Tamai, M., Nishigaki, K., Kitani, T., Shibata, N., Yasumoto, K., and Ito, M. UbiREAL: Realistic Smartspace Simulator for Systematic Testing. In Proc. 8th Int'l Conf. on Ubiquitous Computing (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Pesic, M., Schonenberg, H., and van der Aalst, W. Declare: Full support for loosely-structured processes. In 11th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (2007), 287--287. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Rosenthal, L., and Stanford, V. M. Nist smart space: Pervasive computing initiative. In Proc. of the 9th IEEE Intl. Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collab. Enterprises (2000), 6--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ye, J., Dobson, S., and McKeever, S. Situation identification techniques in pervasive computing: A review. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 8, 1 (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Synthesizing daily life logs through gaming and simulation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        UbiComp '13 Adjunct: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing adjunct publication
        September 2013
        1608 pages
        ISBN:9781450322157
        DOI:10.1145/2494091

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 September 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • tutorial

        Acceptance Rates

        UbiComp '13 Adjunct Paper Acceptance Rate254of399submissions,64%Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader