skip to main content
research-article

Constructing Schedules for Time-Critical Data Delivery in Wireless Sensor Networks

Published:06 May 2014Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks for industrial process monitoring and control require highly reliable and timely data delivery. To match performance requirements, specialised schedule based medium access control (MAC) protocols are employed. In order to construct an efficient system, it is necessary to find a schedule that can support the given application requirements in terms of data delivery latency and reliability. Furthermore, additional requirements such as transmission power may have to be taken into account when constructing the schedule. In this article, we show how such schedule can be constructed. We describe methods and tools to collect the data necessary as input for schedule calculation. Moreover, due to the high complexity of schedule calculation, we also introduce a heuristic. We evaluate the proposed methods in a real-world process automation and control application deployed in an oil refinery and further present a long-term experiment in an office environment. Additionally, we discuss a framework for schedule life-cycle management.

References

  1. Nouha Baccour, Anis Koubâa, Luca Mottola, Marco Antonio Zúñiga, Habib Youssef, Carlo Alberto Boano, and Mário Alves. 2012. Radio link quality estimation in wireless sensor networks: A survey. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 8, 4, 34:1--34:33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. James Brown, Ben McCarthy, Utz Roedig, Thiemo Voigt, and Cormac J. Sreenan. 2011. BurstProbe: Debugging time-critical data delivery in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Wireless Sensor Networks (EWSN'11). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 195--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Alberto Cerpa, Jennifer L. Wong, Miodrag Potkonjak, and Deborah Estrin. 2005. Temporal properties of low power wireless links: modeling and implications on multi-hop routing. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Mobile ad hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc'05). ACM, New York, 414--425. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Krishna Kant Chintalapudi and Lakshmi Venkatraman. 2008. On the design of MAC protocols for low-latency hard real-time discrete control applications over 802.15.4 hardware. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN'08). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 356--367. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Luiz H. Correia, Daniel F. Macedo, Aldri L. dos Santos, Antonio A. Loureiro, and José Marcos S. Nogueira. 2007. Transmission power control techniques for wireless sensor networks. Comput. Netw. 51, 17, 4765--4779. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Geoff Coulson, Barry Porter, Ioannis Chatzigiannakis, Christos Koninis, Stefan Fischer, Dennis Pfisterer, Daniel Bimschas, Torsten Braun, Philipp Hurni, Markus Anwander, Gerald Wagenknecht, Sandor P. Fekete, Alexander Kröller, and Tobias Baumgartner. 2012. Flexible experimentation in wireless sensor networks. Commun. ACM 55, 82--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. Ergen and P. Varaiya. 2006. PEDAMACS: Power efficient and delay aware medium access protocol for sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 5, 7, 920--930. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. E. Felemban, Chang-Gun Lee, and E. Ekici. 2006. MMSPEED: Multipath multi-speed protocol for QoS guarantee of reliability and. Timeliness in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 5, 6, 738--754. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Song Han, Xiuming Zhu, A. Mok, Deji Chen, and M. Nixon. 2011. Reliable and real-time communication in industrial wireless Mesh networks. In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium (RTAS). 3--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. HART Communication Foundation. 2008. HART Communication protocol specication, HCF SPEC 13 Revision 7.1. Available from the HART Communication Foundation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. IEEE. 2008. Wireless Personal Area Networks: Proposal for Factory Automation. IEEE Proposed Standard 802.15.4-15/08/0571r0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. International Society of Automation. 2009. ISA-100.11a-2009 Wireless systems for industrial automation: Process control and related applications. Available from the International Society of Automation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jaein Jeong, D. Culler, and Jae-Hyuk Oh. 2007. Empirical analysis of transmission power control algorithms for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems (INSS'07). 27--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Kyu-Han Kim and Kang G. Shin. 2006. On accurate measurement of link quality in multi-hop wireless mesh networks. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'06). ACM, New York, 38--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Shan Lin, Jingbin Zhang, Gang Zhou, Lin Gu, John A. Stankovic, and Tian He. 2006. ATPC: Adaptive transmission power control for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'06). ACM, New York, 223--236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sirajum Munir, Shan Lin, Enamul Hoque, S. M. Shahriar Nirjon, John A. Stankovic, and Kamin Whitehouse. 2010. Addressing burstiness for reliable communication and latency bound generation in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN'10). ACM, New York, 303--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. T. O'Donovan, J. Brown, F. Büsching, A. Cardoso, J. Cecelio, J. do O, P. Furtado, P. Gil, A. Jugel, W-B. Pöttner, U. Roedig, J. sa Silva, R. Silva, C. Sreenan, V. Vassiliou, T. Voig, and Z. Zinonos. 2014. The GINSENG system for wireless monitoring and control: Design and deployment experiences. ACM Trans. Sens. Netw. 10, 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kristofer S. J. Pister and Lance Doherty. 2008. TSMP: Time synchronized mesh protocol. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Distributed Sensor Networks (DSN).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Wolf-Bastian Pöttner, Lars Wolf, José Cecílio, Pedro Furtado, Ricardo Silva, Jorge Sa Silva, Amancio Santos, Paulo Gil, Alberto Cardoso, Zinon Zinonos, Jose Manuel do Ó, Ben McCarthy, James Brown, Utz Roedig, Tony O'Donovan, Cormac J. Sreenan, Zhitao He, Thiemo Voigt, and Anja Jugel. 2011. WSN Evaluation in Industrial Environments First results and lessons learned. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS'11).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. A. Rao. 2007. Reverse link power control for managing inter-cell interference in orthogonal multiple access systems. In Proceedings of the 66th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 2007 (VTC'07). 1837--1841.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Abusayeed Saifullah, You Xu, Chenyang Lu, and Yixin Chen. 2010. Real-time scheduling for wirelessHART networks. In Proceedings of the 31st IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS'10). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 150--159. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Abusayeed Saifullah, You Xu, Chenyang Lu, and Yixin Chen. 2011. End-to-end delay analysis for fixed priority scheduling in wirelessHART networks. In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium (RTAS'11). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 13--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. M. Senel, K. Chintalapudi, D. Lal, A. Keshavarzian, and E. Coyle. 2007. A Kalman-Filter-Based link quality estimation scheme for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM'07). 875--880.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. C. Sreenan, J. Sa Silva, L. Wolf, R. Eiras, T. Voigt, U. Roedig, V. Vassiliou, and G. Hackenbroich. 2009. Performance control in wireless sensor networks: the GINSENG project - {Global communications newsletter}. IEEE Commun. Mag. 47, 8, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Kannan Srinivasan, Prabal Dutta, Arsalan Tavakoli, and Philip Levis. 2006. Understanding the causes of packet delivery success and failure in dense wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'06). ACM, New York, 419--420. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Kannan Srinivasan, Maria A. Kazandjieva, Saatvik Agarwal, and Philip Levis. 2008. The β-factor: measuring wireless link burstiness. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems (SenSys'08). ACM, New York, 29--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Mario Strasser, Andreas Meier, Koen Langendoen, and Philipp Blum. 2007. Dwarf: Delay-Aware Robust Forwarding for energy-constrained wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS'07). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 64--81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Petcharat Suriyachai, James Brown, and Utz Roedig. 2010. Time-critical data delivery in wireless sensor networks. In Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems, Rajmohan Rajaraman, Thomas Moscibroda, Adam Dunkels, and Anna Scaglione, Eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science series, vol. 6131, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 216--229. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. P. Suriyachai, U. Roedig, and A. Scott. 2012. A Survey of MAC protocols for mission-critical applications in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 14, 2, 240--264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Texas Instruments Incorporated. 2013. 2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15.4/ZigBee-ready RF Transceiver. http://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/cc2420.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Yong Wang, Margaret Martonosi, and Li-Shiuan Peh. 2007. Predicting link quality using supervised learning in wireless sensor networks. SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev. 11, 3, 71--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Alec Woo and David Culler. 2003. Evaluation of efficient link reliability estimators for low-power wireless networks. Tech. Rep. UCB/CSD-03-1270. EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Pouria Zand, Supriyo Chatterjea, Jeroen Ketema, and Paul Havinga. 2011. D-SAR: A distributed scheduling algorithm for real-time, closed-loop control in industrial wireless sensor and actuator networks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Jerry Zhao and Ramesh Govindan. 2003. Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'03). ACM, New York, 1--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Constructing Schedules for Time-Critical Data Delivery in Wireless Sensor Networks

                        Recommendations

                        Comments

                        Login options

                        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                        Sign in

                        Full Access

                        • Published in

                          cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
                          ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 10, Issue 3
                          April 2014
                          509 pages
                          ISSN:1550-4859
                          EISSN:1550-4867
                          DOI:10.1145/2619982
                          Issue’s Table of Contents

                          Copyright © 2014 ACM

                          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                          Publisher

                          Association for Computing Machinery

                          New York, NY, United States

                          Publication History

                          • Published: 6 May 2014
                          • Accepted: 1 June 2013
                          • Revised: 1 April 2013
                          • Received: 1 October 2012
                          Published in tosn Volume 10, Issue 3

                          Permissions

                          Request permissions about this article.

                          Request Permissions

                          Check for updates

                          Qualifiers

                          • research-article
                          • Research
                          • Refereed

                        PDF Format

                        View or Download as a PDF file.

                        PDF

                        eReader

                        View online with eReader.

                        eReader