Wanita Sherchan
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Web-based social networks have become popular as a medium for disseminating information and connecting like-minded people. The public accessibility of such networks with the ability to share opinions, thoughts, information, and experience offers great promise to enterprises and governments. In addition to individuals using such networks to connect to their friends and families, governments and enterprises have started exploiting these platforms for delivering their services to citizens and customers. However, the success of such attempts relies on the level of trust that members have with each other as well as with the service provider. Therefore, trust becomes an essential and important element of a successful social network. In this article, we present the first comprehensive review of social and computer science literature on trust in social networks. We first review the existing definitions of trust and define social trust in the context of social networks. We then discuss recent works addressing three aspects of social trust: trust information collection, trust evaluation, and trust dissemination. Finally, we compare and contrast the literature and identify areas for further research in social trust.
- Abdul-Rahman, A. and Hailes, S. 2000. Supporting trust in virtual communities. In Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'00). IEEE Computer Society, 1--9. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Adali, S., Escriva, R., Goldberg, M. K., Hayvanovych, M., Magdon-Ismail, M., Szymanski, B. K., Wallace, W. A., and Williams, G. 2010. Measuring behavioral trust in social networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI'10). 150--152.Google Scholar
- Alesina, A. and La Ferrara, E. 2002. Who trusts others? J. Public Econ. 85, 1, 207--234.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andersen, R., Borgs, C., Chayes, J., Feige, U., Flaxman, A., Kalai, A., Mirrokni, V., and Tennenholtz, M. 2008. Trust-based recommendation systems: An axiomatic approach. In Proceeding of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW'08). ACM Press, New York, 199--208. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Artz, D. and Gil, Y. 2007. A survey of trust in computer science and the semantic web. Web Semantics 5, 2, 58--71. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Azer, M. A., El-Kassas, S. M., Hassan, A. W. F., and El-Soudani, M. S. 2008. A survey on trust and reputation schemes in ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 881--886. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barnes, J. A. 1954. Class and committees in a norwegian island parish. Hum. Relat. 7, 1, 39--54.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Beatty, P., Reay, I., Dick, S., and Miller, J. 2011. Consumer trust in e-commerce web sites: A metastudy. ACM Comput. Surv. 43, 3, 1--46. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bimrah, K. K., Mouratidis, H., and Preston, D. 2008. Modelling trust requirements by means of a visualization language. In Proceedings of the Conference on Requirements Engineering Visualization (REV'08). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 26--30. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Boltzmann, L. 1964. Lectures on Gas Theory. Translated by Stephen G. Brush. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
- Brunie, A. 2009. Meaningful distinctions within a concept: Relational, collective, and generalized social capital. Social Sci. Res. 38, 2, 251--265.Google Scholar
- Buskens, V. 1998. The social structure of trust. Social Netw. 20, 3, 265--289.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Castelfranchi, C., Conte, R., and Paolucci, M. 1998. Normative reputation and the costs of compliance. J. Artif. Soc. Social Simul. 1, 3.Google Scholar
- Caverlee, J., Liu, L., and Webb, S. 2008. Socialtrust: Tamper-resilient trust establishment in online communities. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL'08). ACM Press, New York, 104--114. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Challener, D., Yoder, K., Catherman, R., Safford, D., and Van Doorn, L. 2007. A Practical Guide to Trusted Computing. 1st Ed. IBM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chang, E., Dillon, T. S., and Hussain, F. 2006. Trust and Reputation for Service-Oriented Environments: Technologies for Building Business Intelligence and Consumer Confidence. Wiley Periodicals. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chen, H.-C. and Chen, A. L. P. 2001. A music recommendation system based on music data grouping and user interests. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM'01). ACM Press, New York, 231--238. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chen, L. and Li, J. 2010. Revocation of direct anonymous attestation. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Trusted Systems (INTRUST'10). 128--147. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christianson, B. and Harbison, W. 1996. Why isn't trust transitive? In Proceedings of the Security Protocols Workshop. 171--176. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Claridge, T. 2004. Social capital and natural resource management. M.S. thesis, Australia. http://www. socialcapitalresearch.com/literature/nrm.html.Google Scholar
- Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociology 94, 1, 95--120.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Cook, K. S., Yamagishi, T., Cheshire, C., Cooper, R., Matsuda, M., and Mashima, R. 2005. Trust building via risk taking: A cross-societal experiment. Social Psychol. Quart. 2, 68, 121--142.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Coulter, K. S. and Coulter, R. A. 2002. Determinants of trust in a service provider: The moderating role of length of relationship. J. Service. Market. 16, 1, 35--50.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., and Sunde, U. 2006. The intergenerational transmission of risk and trust attitudes. IZA working paper. http://www.cens.uni-bonn.de/team/board/armin-falk/the-intergenerational-transmission-of-risk-and-trust-attitudes-review-of-economic-studies-2012-792-645-677-with-thomas-dohmen-david-huffman-and-uwe-sunde‥pdf.Google Scholar
- Dumouchel, P. 2005. Trust as an action. Euro. J. Sociol. 46, 417--428.Google Scholar
- Dwyer, C., Hiltz, S. R., and Passerini, K. 2007. Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: A comparison of facebook and myspace. In Proceedings of the 13th Americas Conference on Information Systems.Google Scholar
- Elsalamouny, E., Sassone, V., and Nielsen, M. 2010. HMM-based trust model. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Formal Aspects on Security and Trust (FAST'09). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5983, Springer, 21--35. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Gilbert, E. and Karahalios, K. 2009. Predicting tie strength with social media. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'09). ACM Press, New York, NY, 211--220. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Golbeck, J. 2005a. Personalizing applications through integration of inferred trust values in semantic web-based social networks. In Proceedings of the Semantic Network Analysis Workshop at the 4th International Semantic Web Conference.Google Scholar
- Golbeck, J. 2006a. Combining provenance with trust in social networks for semantic web content filtering. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Provenance and Annotation of Data (IPAW'06). L. Moreau and I. Foster, Eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series, vol. 4145, Springer, 101--108. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Golbeck, J. 2006b. Trust on the world wide web: A survey. Found. Trends Web Sci. 1, 2, 131--197. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Golbeck, J. 2007. The dynamics of web-based social networks: Membership, relationships, and change. First Monday 12, 11.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Golbeck, J., Parsia, B., and Hendler, J. 2003. Trust networks on the semantic web. In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Cooperative Intelligent Agents. 238--249.Google Scholar
- Golbeck, J. A. 2005b. Computing and applying trust in web-based social networks. Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland at College Park, MD. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Grandison, T. and Sloman, M. 2000. A survey of trust in internet applications. IEEE Comm. Surv. Tutorials 3, 4. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociology 78, 1360--1380.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91, 481--510.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gross, R. and Acquisti, A. 2005. Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society (WPES'05). ACM Press, New York, 71--80. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guerriero, A., Kubicki, S., and Halin, G. 2009. Trust-oriented multi-visualization of cooperation context. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference in Visualisation (VIZ'09). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA 96--101. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hanchard, S. 2008. Measuring trust and social networks - Where do we put our trust online? Hitwise. http://weblogs.hitwise.com/sandra-hanchard/2008/09/measuring_trust_and_social_net.html.Google Scholar
- Hang, W. C. and Singh, M. P. 2010. Trust based recommendation based on graph similarities. http://www.csc. ncsu.edu/faculty/mpsingh/papers/mas/aamas-trust-10-graph.pdf.Google Scholar
- Haythornthwaite, C. 2005. Social networks and internet connectivity effects. Inf. Comm. Soc. 8, 2, 125--147.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Helbing, D. 1994. A mathematical model for the behavior of individuals in a social field. J. Math. Sociol. 19, 3, 189--219.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Helbing, D. 1992. A mathematical model for attitude formation by pair interactions. Behav. Sci. 37, 3, 190--214. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., and Riedl, J. 2000. Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'00). 241--250. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hess, C. 2006. Trust-based recommendations for publications: A multi-layer network approach. IEEE Tech. Commit. Digital Librar. Bull. 2, 2.Google Scholar
- Hess, C. 2008. Trust-based recommendations in multi-layer networks. Ph.D. thesis, Otto-Friedrich University Bamberg/University Paris-Sud.Google Scholar
- Hoffman, K., Zage, D., and Nita-Rotaru, C. 2009. A survey of attack and defense techniques for reputation systems. ACM Comput. Surv. 42, 1--31. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Holmes, J. 1991. Trust and the appraisal process in close relationships. In Advances in Personal Relationships, W. Jones and D. Perlman, Eds., Jessica Kingsley, London, 57--104.Google Scholar
- Huang, F. 2007. Building social trust: A human-capital approach. J. Institut. Theor. Econ. 163, 4, 552--573.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hughes, D., Coulson, G., and Walkerdine, J. 2005. Free riding on gnutella revisited: The bell tolls? IEEE Distrib. Syst. Online 6, 6, 1. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Humphreys, L. 2007. Mobile social networks and social practice: A case study of dodgeball. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 13, 1, 341--360.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Huynh, T. D., Jennings, N. R., and Shadbolt, N. R. 2006. Certified reputation: How an agent can trust a stranger. In Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS'06). New York, NY, 1217--1224. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jackson, P. J. 1999. Virtual Working: Social and Organisational Dynamics. Routledge, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jaeger, P. T., Shneiderman, B., Fleischmann, K. R., Preece, J., Qu, Y., and Wu, P. F. 2007. Community response grids: E-government, social networks, and effective emergency management. Telecomm. Policy 31, 10--11, 592--604. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jamieson, K. and Cappella, J. 2009. Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Johnson, D. and Grayson, K. 2005. Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships. J. Bus. Res. 58, 4, 500--507.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jones, K. 1996. Trust as an affective attitude. Ethics 107, 1, 4--25.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Josang, A. 2001. A logic for uncertain probabilities. Int. J. Uncert., Fuzzin. Knowl.-Based Syst. 9, 3, 279--311. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Josang, A. and Golbeck, J. 2009. Challenges for robust trust and reputation systems. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Security and Trust Management (STM'09).Google Scholar
- Josang, A., Gray, E., and Kinateder, M. 2003. Analysing topologies of transitive trust. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Formal Aspects in Security and Trust (FAST'03). 9--22.Google Scholar
- Josang, A., Hayward, R., and Pope, S. 2006. Trust network analysis with subjective logic. In Proceedings of the 29th Australasian Computer Science Conference (ACSC'06). Australian Computer Society, Hobart, Australia, 85--94. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Josang, A. and Ismail, R. 2002. The beta reputation system. In Proceedings of the 15th Bled Conference on Electronic Commerce. 891--900.Google Scholar
- Josang, A., Ismail, R., and Boyd, C. 2007. A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decis. Support Syst. 43, 2, 618--644. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jurca, R. and Faltings, B. 2003. An incentive compatible reputation mechanism. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on E-Commerce (CEC'03). 396--409.Google Scholar
- Kamvar, S. D., Schlosser, M. T., and Garcia-Molina, H. 2003. The eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in p2p networks. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW'03). ACM Press, New York, 640--651. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kautz, H., Selman, B., and Shah, M. 1997. Referral web: Combining social networks and collaborative filtering. Comm. ACM 40, 63--65. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Keith, S. and Coulter, R. A. C. 2002. Determinants of trust in a service provider: The moderating role of length of relationship. J. Services Market. 16, 1, 35--50.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kerr, R. and Cohen, R. 2009. Smart cheaters do prosper: Defeating trust and reputation systems. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS'09). Vol. 2, 993--1000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kim, Y. A. 2008. Building a web of trust without explicit trust ratings. In Proceedings of the 24th IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering Workshop. 531--536.Google Scholar
- Kleinfeld, J. 2002. The small world problem. Soc. Social Sci. Public Policy 39, 61--66.Google Scholar
- Klos, T. B. and La Poutre, H. 2005. Decentralized reputation-based trust for assessing agent reliability under aggregate feedback. In Trusting Agents for Trusting Electronic Societies, Springer, 10--128. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kollock, P. 1994. The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust. Amer. J. Sociol. 100, 2, 313--345.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Komiak, S. X. and Benbasat, I. 2004. Understanding customer trust in agent-mediated electronic commerce, web-mediated electronic commerce, and traditional commerce. Inf. Technol. Manag. 5, 181--207. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kuan, H. and Bock, G. 2005. The collective reality of trust: An investigation of social relations and networks on trust in multi-channel retailers. In Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS'05).Google Scholar
- Kuter, U. and Golbeck, J. 2007. Sunny: A new algorithm for trust inference in social networks using probabilistic confidence models. In Proceedings of the 22nd National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 1377--1382. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lawler, E. J. and Yoon, J. 1996. Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61, 89--108.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lazarsfeld, P. and Merton, R. 1954. Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In Freedom and Control in Modern Society, M. Berger, T. Abel, and C. H. Page, Eds., Van Nostrand, New York, 18--66.Google Scholar
- Levin, D. Z., Cross, R., and Abrams, L. C. 2004. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Manag. Sci. 50, 1477--1490. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lewis, J. D. and Weigert, A. 1985. Trust as a social reality. Social Forces 63, 4, 967--985.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Likert, R. 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archiv. Psychol. 140, 1, 1--55.Google Scholar
- Liu, H., Lim, E.-P., Lauw, H. W., Le, M.-T., Sun, A., Srivastava, J., and Kim, Y. A. 2008. Predicting trusts among users of online communities: An epinions case study. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC'08). ACM Press, New York, 310--319. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maheswaran, M., Tang, H. C., and Ghunaim, A. 2007. Towards a gravity-based trust model for social networking systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 24. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Malik, Z., Akbar, I., and Bouguettaya, A. 2009. Web services reputation assessment using a hidden markov model. In Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Service-Oriented Computing (ICSOC-ServiceWave'09). 576--591. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Malik, Z. and Bouguettaya, A. 2009. Reputation bootstrapping for trust establishment among web services. IEEE Internet Comput. 13, 40--47. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Manikrao, U. S. and Prabhakar, T. V. 2005. Dynamic selection of web services with recommendation system. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Next Generation Web Services Practices (NWESP'05). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 117--121. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marmol, F. G. and Perez, G. M. 2011. Trust and reputation models comparison. Internet Res. 21, 138--153.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marsh, S. P. 1994. Formalising trust as a computational concept. Ph.D. thesis, University of Stirling.Google Scholar
- Massa, P. and Avesani, P. 2007. Trust-aware recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys'07). ACM Press, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mcleod, A. and Pippin, S. 2009. Security and privacy trust in e-government: Understanding system and relationship trust antecedents. In Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'09). 1--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mcpherson, M., Lovin, L. S., and Cook, J. M. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 27, 1, 415--444.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mika, P. 2007. Social Networks and the Semantic Web. Springer. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Miles, R. E. and Creed, W. E. D. 1995. Organizational forms and managerial philosophies: A descriptive and analytical review. Res. Organizat. Behav. 17, 333--372.Google Scholar
- Milgram, S. 1967. The small world problem. Psychol. Today 1, 1, 60--67.Google Scholar
- Moibus, M. and Quoc-Anh, D. 2004. Social capital in social networks. http://www.earthinstitute. columbia.edu/cgsd/documents/rosenblat.pdf.Google Scholar
- Mollering, G. 2002. The nature of trust: From geog simmel to a theory of expectation, interpretation and suspension. Sociol. 35, 403--420.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Molm, L. D., Takahashi, N., and Peterson, G. 2000. Risk and trust in social exchange: An experimental test of a classical proposition. Amer. J. Sociol. 5, 105, 1396--1427.Google Scholar
- Momani, M. and Challa, S. 2010. Survey of trust models in different network domains. Int. J. Ad Hoc Sensor Ubiq. Comput. 1, 3, 1--19.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Moreland, D., Nepal, S., Hwang, H., and Zic, J. 2010. A snapshot of trusted personal devices applicable to transaction processing. Personal Ubiq. Comput. 14, 4, 347--361. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mui, L. 2003. Computational models of trust and reputation: Agents, evolutionary games, and social networks. Ph.D. thesis. http://groups.csail.mit.edu/medg/people/lmui/docs/phddissertation.pdf.Google Scholar
- Mui, L., Mohtashemi, M., and Halberstadt, A. 2002. A computational model of trust and reputation. In Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'02). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 188--196. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy Manag. Rev. 23, 2, 242--266.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nepal, S., Sherchan, W., and Bouguettaya, A. 2010a. A behavior based trust model for service web. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (SOCA'10). IEEE Computer Society, 1--4.Google Scholar
- Nepal, S., Sherchan, W., and Paris, C. 2011. STrust: A trust model for social networks. In Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom'11). 841--846. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nepal, S., Zic, J., Liu, D., and Jang, J. 2010b. Trusted computing platform in your pocket. In Proceedings of the IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing (EUC'10). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 812--817. Google ScholarDigital Library
- O'Donovan, J., Smyth, B., Evrim, V., and Mcleod, D. 2007. Extracting and visualizing trust relationships from online auction feedback comments. In Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, 2826--2831. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paldam, M. 2000. Social capital: One or many? Definition and measurement. J. Econ. Surv. 5, 1, 629--653.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paradesi, S., Doshi, P., and Swaika, S. 2009. Integrating behavioral trust in web service compositions. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'09). 453--460. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster, New York.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Putnam, R. D. 1995. Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. J. Democracy 6, 1, 65--78.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Friedman, E., and Kuwabara, K. 2000. Reputation systems. Comm. ACM 43, 12, 45--48. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richardson, M., Agrawal, R., and Domingos, P. 2003. Trust management for the semantic web. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Semantic Web Conference. 351--368.Google Scholar
- Romer, P. M. 2000. Thinking and feeling. Amer. Econ. Rev. 90, 2, 439--443.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rotter, J. B. 1967. A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. J. Personality 35, 4, 651--665.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rotter, J. B. 1971. Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. Amer. Psychol. 26, 1, 443--452.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., and Camerer, C. 1998. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy Manag. Rev. 23, 3, 393--404.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ruohomaa, S. and Kutvonen, L. 2005. Trust management survey. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Trust Management (iTrust'05). Springer, 77--92. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ruohomaa, S., Kutvonen, L., and Koutrouli, E. 2007. Reputation management survey. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES'07). IEEE Computer Society, 103--111. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sabater, J. 2002. Trust and reputation for agent societies. Ph.D. thesis, Autonomous University Of Barcelona, Spain. http://www.tesisenxarxa.net/TESIS_UAB/AVAILABLE/TDX-0123104172828//jsm1de1.pdf.Google Scholar
- Sabater, J. and Sierra, C. 2002. Reputation and social network analysis in multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS'02). ACM Press, New York, 475--482. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sabater, J. and Sierra, C. 2005. Review on computational trust and reputation models. Artif. Intell. Rev. 24, 33--60. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schillo, M., Funk, P., and Rovatsos, M. 2000. Using trust for detecting deceitful agents in artificial societies. Appl. Artif. Intell. 14, 8, 825--848.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schneider, O. 2009. Trust-aware social networking: A distributed storage system based on social trust and geographic proximity. M.S. thesis. http://www.peerson.net/papers/oliver_da.pdf.Google Scholar
- Scully, M. and Preuss, G. 1996. Two faces of trust: The roles of calculative and relational trust in work transformation. Tech. rep. working paper no. 3923--96, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
- Seshadri, A., Perrig, A., van Doorn, L., and Khosla, P. K. 2004. SWATT: Software-based attestation for embedded devices. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. 272--282.Google Scholar
- Singh, M. P., Yu, B., and Venkatraman, M. 2001. Community-based service location. Comm. ACM 44, 49--54. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Singh, S. and Bawa, S. 2007. Privacy, trust and policy based authorization framework for services in distributed environments. Int. J. Comput. Sci. 2, 2, 85--92.Google Scholar
- Song, S., Hwang, K., Zhou, R., and Kwok, Y.-K. 2005. Trusted p2p transactions with fuzzy reputation aggregation. IEEE Internet Comput. 9, 6, 24--34. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Song, W., Phoha, V. V., and Xu, X. 2004. The hmm-based model for evaluating recommender's reputation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology for Dynamic E-Business. IEEE, 209--215. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Staab, S., Bhargava, B., Lilien, L., Rosenthal, A., Winslett, M., Sloman, M., Dillon, T. S., Chang, E., Hussain, F. K., Nejdl, W., Olmedilla, D., and Kashyap, V. 2004. The pudding of trust: Managing the dynamic nature of trust. IEEE Intell. Syst. 19, 5, 74--88. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sturgis, P., Read, S., Hatemi, P., Zhu, G., Trull, T., Wright, M., and Martin, N. 2010. A genetic basis for social trust? Polit. Behav. 32, 2, 205--230.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Suh, B. and Han, I. 2002. Effect of trust on customer acceptance of Internet banking. Electron. Commerce Res. Appl. 1, 3--4, 247--263.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Suryanarayana, G., T. R. 2004. A survey of trust management and resource discovery technologies in peer-to-peer applications. Tech. rep. UCI-ISR-04-6, Institute for Software Research, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
- Sztompka, P. 1999. Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Taylor, R. 2000. Marketing strategies: Gaining a competitive advantage through the use of emotion. Competitiv. Rev. 10, 146--152.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Toivonen, S., Lenzini, G., and Uusitalo, I. 2006. Context-aware trust evaluation functions for dynamic reconfigurable systems. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Models of Trust for the Web (MTW'06), held in Conjunction with the 15th International World Wide Web Conference, T. Finin, L. Kagal, and D. Olmedilla, Eds., CEUR Workshop Proceedings Series, vol. 190.Google Scholar
- Trifunovic, S., Legendre, F., and Anastasiades, C. 2010. Social trust in opportunistic networks. In Proceedings of the INFOCOM IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops. IEEE, 1--6.Google Scholar
- Tyler, T. R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
- Tyler, T. R. and Degoey, P. 1996. Trust in organizational authorities: The influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions. In Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, R. M. Kramer and T. R. Tyler, Eds., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
- Vigas, F. B. and Donath, J. 2004. Social network visualization: Can we go beyond the graph? In Proceedings of the Workshop on Social Networks for Design and Analysis: Using Network Information in CSCW. 6--10.Google Scholar
- von Laszewski, G., Alunkal, B., and Veljkovic, I. 2005. Towards reputable grids: Scalable computing. Pract. Exper. 6, 3, 95--106.Google Scholar
- Waldman, M., Rubin, A. D., and Cranor, L. F. 2000. Publius: A robust, tamper-evident, censorship resistent web publishing system. In Proceedings of the 9th USENIX Security Symposium. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Walter, F. E., Battiston, S., and Schweitzer, F. 2009. Personalised and dynamic trust in social networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys'09). ACM Press, New York, 197--204. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wang, T. and Lu, Y. 2010. Determinants of trust in e-government. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering (CiSE'10). 1--4.Google Scholar
- Wang, Y., Hori, Y., and Sakurai, K. 2007. Economic-inspired truthful reputation feedback mechanism in p2p networks. In Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Workshop on Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems. 80--88. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wang, Y. and Vassileva, J. 2007. A review on trust and reputation for web service selection. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW'07). IEEE Computer Society, 25--32. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Watts, D. J. 2003. Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age. W.W. Norton and Company, New York.Google Scholar
- Wei-Hang, C. and Singh, M. P. 2010. Trust-based recommendation based on graph similarity. In Proceedings of the 13th AAMAS Workshop on Trust in Agent Societies. http://www.csc.ncsu.edu/faculty/mpsingh/papers/mas/aamas-trust-10-graph.pdf.Google Scholar
- Wellman, B. 1996. For a social network analysis of computer networks: A sociological perspective on collaborative work and virtual community. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCPR/SIGMIS Conference on Computer Personnel Research (SIGCPR'96). ACM Press, New York, 1--11. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wellman, B. 2004. The global village: Internet and community. Arts Sci. Rev. 1, 1, 26--30.Google Scholar
- Williamson, O. E. 1993. Calculativeness, trust and economic organization. J. Law Econ. 30, 1, 131--145.Google Scholar
- Wishart, R., Robinson, R., Indulska, J., and Josang, A. 2005. Superstringrep: Reputation-enhanced service discovery. In Proceedings of the 28th Australasian Conference on Computer Science (ACSC'05). Australian Computer Society, Darlinghurst, Australia, 49--57. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xiang, R., Neville, J., and Rogati, M. 2010. Modeling relationship strength in online social networks. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW'10). ACM Press, New York, 981--990. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xiong, L. and Liu, L. 2003. A reputation-based trust model for peer-to-peer ecommerce communities. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC'03). ACM Press, New York, 228--229. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xiong, L. and Liu, L. 2004. PeerTrust: Supporting reputation-based trust for peer-to-peer electronic communities. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Engin. 16, 7, 843--857. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yan, Z., Niemi, V., Dong, Y., and Yu, G. 2008. A user behavior based trust model for mobile applications. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Autonomic and Trusted Computing. 455--469. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yan, Z. and Yan, R. 2009. Formalizing trust based on usage behaviours for mobile applications. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Autonomic and Trusted Computing. 194--208. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yang, J., Hu, X., and Zhang, H. 2007. Effects of a reputation feedback system on an online consumer-to-consumer auction market. Decis. Support Syst. 44, 1, 93--105. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yaniv, I. and Kleinberger, E. 2000. Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organiz. Behav. Hum. Decision Process. 83, 2, 260--281.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yao, J., Chen, S., Nepal, S., Levy, D., and Zic, J. 2010. Truststore: Making amazon s3 trustworthy with services composition. In Proceedings of the 10th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGRID'10). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 600--605. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Young, A. L. and Quan-Haase, A. 2009. Information revelation and internet privacy concerns on social network sites: A case study of facebook. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Communities and Technologies. 265--274. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yu, B. and Singh, M. P. 2000. A social mechanism for reputation management in electronic communities. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Cooperative Information Agents (CIA'00). Springer, 154--165. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yu, B. and Singh, M. P. 2002. An evidential model of distributed reputation management. In Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS'02). ACM Press, New York, 294--301. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yu, B., Singh, M. P., and Sycara, K. 2004. Developing trust in large-scale peer-to-peer systems. In Proceedings of the 1st IEEE Symposium on Multi-Agent Security and Survivability. IEEE Computer Society, 1--10.Google Scholar
- Zacharia, G. and Maes, P. 2000. Trust management through reputation mechanisms. Appl. Artif. Intell. 14, 9, 881--907.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zajonc, R. 1980. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. Amer. Psychol. 35, 2, 151--175.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zappen, J. P., Harrison, T. M., and Watson, D. 2008. A new paradigm for designing e-government: Web 2.0 and experience design. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Government Research. Digital Government Society of North America, 17--26. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zarghami, A., Fazeli, S., Dokoohaki, N., and Matskin, M. 2009. Social trust-aware recommendation system: A t-index approach. In Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT'09). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 85--90. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhang, Y., Chen, H., and Wu, Z. 2006. A social network-based trust model for the semantic web. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Autonomic and Trusted Computing. 183--192. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhang, Y. and Fang, Y. 2007. A fine-grained reputation system for reliable service selection in peer-to-peer networks. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 18, 8, 1134--1145. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhou, R. and Hwang, K. 2007. PowerTrust: A robust and scalable reputation system for trusted peer-to-peer computing. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 18, 4, 460--473. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ziegler, C.-N. and Lausen, G. 2004. Spreading activation models for trust propagation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on e-Technology, e-Commerce and e-Service (EEE'04). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 83--97. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zuo, Y., Hu, W.-C., and O'Keefe, T. 2009. Trust computing for social networking. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 1534--1539. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- A survey of trust in social networks
Recommendations
Building trust communities using social trust
UMAP'11: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Advances in User ModelingThe growing popularity of Web based social networks has given rise to the need to build trust communities that inspire members to share their experiences, feelings and opinions in an open and honest way. In this paper, we propose a framework for building ...
Social Ties and Generalized Trust, Online and in Person: Contact or Conflict-The Mediating Role of Bonding Social Capital in America
Results of the present survey (n = 888) suggest that having strong social ties (or bonding social capital) fosters generalized trust, in support of conflict theory. There was no link between bridging social capital, or one's more diverse ties, and ...
Social trust and algorithmic equity: The societal perspectives of users' intention to interact with algorithm recommendation systems
AbstractThe use of algorithm recommendation systems (ARS), which collect and analyze users' personal data to generate personalized and tailored recommended items, has become widespread in the era of mobile internet. While related literature has focused ...
Highlights- We examine the trust-driven psychological mechanism leading to intention to interact with algorithm recommendation systems.
- We focus on societal aspects of algorithm recommendation systems such as social trust and algorithmic equity.
Comments