skip to main content
10.1145/2507157.2507184acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Topic diversity in tag recommendation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 October 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Tag recommendation approaches have historically focused on maximizing the relevance of the recommended tags for a given object, such as a movie or a song. Nevertheless, different users may be interested in the same object for different reasons---for instance, the Star Wars movies may appeal to both adventure as well as to fantasy movie fans. In this situation, a sensible strategy is to provide a user with diverse recommendations of how to tag the object. In this paper, we address the problem of recommending relevant and diverse tags as a ranking problem. In particular, we propose a novel tag recommendation approach that explicitly takes into account the possible topics (e.g., categories) underlying an object in order to promote tags with high coverage and low redundancy with respect to these topics. We thoroughly evaluate our proposed approach using data collected from two popular Web 2.0 applications, namely, LastFM and MovieLens. Our experimental results attest the effectiveness of our approach at promoting more relevant and diverse tags in contrast to state-of-the-art relevance-based methods as well as a recently proposed method that takes both relevance and diversity into account.

References

  1. R. Agrawal, S. Gollapudi, A. Halverson, and S. Ieong. Diversifying search results. In WSDM, pages 5--14, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto. Modern Information Retrieval. Addison-Wesley, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. W. Banzhaf, P. Nordin, R. E. Keller, and F. D. Francone. Genetic Programming -- An Introduction On The Automatic Evolution Of Computer Programs And Its Applications. Morgan Kaufmann, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. F. Belém, E. Martins, J. Almeida, and M. Gonçalves. Exploiting relevance, novelty and diversity in tag recommendation. In ECIR, pages 380--391, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. F. Belém, E. Martins, T. Pontes, J. Almeida, and M. Gonçalves. Associative tag recommendation exploiting multiple textual features. In SIGIR, pages 1033--1042, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. L. Breiman. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45:5--32, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. H. Cao, M. Xie, L. Xue, C. Liu, F. Teng, and Y. Huang. Social tag prediction based on supervised ranking model. In ECML PKDD, pages 35--48, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. Carbonell and J. Goldstein. The use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. In SIGIR, pages 335--336, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. O. Celma and P. Herrera. A new approach to evaluating novel recommendations. In RecSys, pages 179--186, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. C. L. Clarke, N. Craswell, I. Soboroff, and A. Ashkan. A comparative analysis of cascade measures for novelty and diversity. In WSDM, pages 75--84, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. C. L. A. Clarke, N. Craswell, and E. M. Voorhees. Overview of the TREC 2012 Web track. In TREC, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. U. Feige. A threshold of łn(n) for approximating set cover. J. ACM, 45:634--652, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. F. Figueiredo, F. Belém, H. Pinto, J. Almeida, and M. Gonçalves. Assessing the quality of textual features in social media. IP&M, pages 222--247, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. P. Geurts and G. Louppe. Learning to rank with extremely randomized trees. JMLR, 14:49--61, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. D. S. Hochbaum, editor. Approximation algorithms for NP-hard problems. PWS Publishing Co., 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Khuller, A. Moss, and J. S. Naor. The budgeted maximum coverage problem. Inf. Proc. Lett., 70:39--45, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. X. Li, L. Guo, and Y. E. Zhao. Tag-based social interest discovery. In WWW, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. Lipczak and E. Milios. Efficient tag recommendation for real-life data. TIST, 3(1):2:1--2:21, Oct. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. B. Markines, C. Cattuto, F. Menczer, D. Benz, A. Hotho, and G. Stumme. Evaluating similarity measures for emergent semantics of social tagging. In WWW, pages 641--650, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. Rendle and L. Schmidt-Thie. Pairwise interaction tensor factorization for personalized tag recommendation. In WSDM, pages 81--90, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. T. Ribeiro, A. Lacerda, A. Veloso, and N. Ziviani. Pareto-efficient hybridization for multi-objective recommender systems. In RecSys, pages 19--26, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. R. L. T. Santos, C. Macdonald, and I. Ounis. Exploiting query reformulations for web search result diversification. In WWW, pages 881--890, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. R. L. T. Santos, C. Macdonald, and I. Ounis. On the role of novelty for search result diversification. Inf. Retr., 15(5):478--502, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. B. Sigurbjörnsson and R. Zwol. Flickr tag recommendation based on collective knowledge. In WWW, pages 327--336, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. S. Vargas and P. Castells. Rank and relevance in novelty and diversity metrics for recommender systems. In RecSys, pages 109--116, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. C. Wartena and M. Wibbels. Improving tag-based recommendation by topic diversification. In ECIR, pages 43--54, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. L. Wu, L. Yang, N. Yu, and X. Hua. Learning to tag. In WWW, pages 361--370, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. C. Zhai, W. W. Cohen, and J. Lafferty. Beyond independent relevance: Methods and evaluation metrics for subtopic retrieval. In SIGIR, pages 10--17, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Topic diversity in tag recommendation

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          RecSys '13: Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Recommender systems
          October 2013
          516 pages
          ISBN:9781450324090
          DOI:10.1145/2507157
          • General Chairs:
          • Qiang Yang,
          • Irwin King,
          • Qing Li,
          • Program Chairs:
          • Pearl Pu,
          • George Karypis

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 12 October 2013

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          RecSys '13 Paper Acceptance Rate32of136submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate254of1,295submissions,20%

          Upcoming Conference

          RecSys '24
          18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
          October 14 - 18, 2024
          Bari , Italy

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader