skip to main content
10.1145/2531602.2531729acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A comparison of social, learning, and financial strategies on crowd engagement and output quality

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 February 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

A significant challenge for crowdsourcing has been increasing worker engagement and output quality. We explore the effects of social, learning, and financial strategies, and their combinations, on increasing worker retention across tasks and change in the quality of worker output. Through three experiments, we show that 1) using these strategies together increased workers' engagement and the quality of their work; 2) a social strategy was most effective for increasing engagement; 3) a learning strategy was most effective in improving quality. The findings of this paper provide strategies for harnessing the crowd to perform complex tasks, as well as insight into crowd workers' motivation.

References

  1. Amabile, T. M. Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3(3), (1993), 185--20Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Baumeister, R.F. and Leary, M.R. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological bulletin 117, 3 (1995), 497.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowen, D.E. and Lawler, E.E. Total quality-oriented human resources management. Organizational Dynamics 20, 4 (1992), 29--41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Chandler, D. and Kapelner, A. Breaking monotony with meaning: Motivation in crowdsourcing markets. University of Chicago mimeo, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Choi, B., Alexander, K., Kraut, R. E. and Levine J. M., Socialization tactics in Wikipedia and their effects. In Proc. CSCW 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Collins, N. L. and Miller, L. C., Self-disclourse and Liking: a meta-analytic review. Psychological bulletin 116, 3 (1994), 457--475.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Deci, E.L., Koestner, R., and Ryan, R.M. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological bulletin 125, 6 (1999), 62Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dow, S., Kulkarni, A., Bunge, B., Nguyen, T., Klemmer, S., and Hartmann, B. Shepherding the crowd: managing and providing feedback to crowd workers. In Proc. CHI EA 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ertmer, P. A., Richardson, J. C., Belland, B., Camin, D., Connolly, P., Coulthard, G., Lei, K., and Mong, C., Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: an exploratory study. JCMC, 12(2), (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jehn, K. A. The dynamic nature of conflict: a longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal 44, 2(2001), 238--251.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Galton, F. The geometric mean, in vital and social statistics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 29, 196--199 (1879), 365--367.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hackman, J.R. and Oldham, G.R. Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational behavior and human quality 16, 2 (1976), 250--279.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Heckman, J.J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, (1979), 153--161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hill, C.A. Affiliation motivation: People who need people? but in different ways. Journal of personality and social psychology 52, 5 (1987), 1008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hsieh, G., Hudson, S.E., and Kraut, R.E. Donate for credibility: how contribution strategies can improve credibility. In Proc. CHI 2011, 3435--3438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Huang, S.-W. and Fu, W.-T. Don't Hide in the Crowd! Increasing Social Transparency Between Peer Workers Improves Crowdsourcing Outcomes. In Proc. CHI 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jenkins, G. D., Mitra, A., Gupta, N. and Shaw, J. D., Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. Journal of Applied Psychology 83, 5(1998), 777--787.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Jensen, M. and Murphy, K., Competition and Incentives: Practice vs Theory. Journal of Finance 43 (1988), 593--616.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Kinnaird, P., Dabbish, L., Kiesler, S., and Faste, H. Co-worker transparency in a microtask marketplace. In Proc. CSCW 2013, 1285--1290. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kittur, A., Nickerson, J. V., Bernstein, M. S., Gerber, E. M., Shaw, A., Zimmerman, J., Lease, M., and Horton, J. J. The future of crowd work. In Proc. CSCW 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kittur, A., Smus, B., Khamkar, S., and Kraut, R.E. Crowdforge: Crowdsourcing complex work. In Proc. UIST 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lasecki, W., Murray, K., White, S., Miller, R. C., and Bigham,J. P. Real-time crowd control of existing interfaces. In Proc. UIST 2011, 23--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Lawler III, E.E. 3. Job design and employee motivation. Personnel Psychology 22, 4 (1969), 426--435.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Leana, C. R., & Van Buren, H. J. Organizational social capital and employment practices. Academy of Management Review 24, (1999)., 538--555.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Mason, W. and Watts, D.J. Financial strategies and the quality of crowds. ACM SigKDD Explorations Newsletter 11, 2 (2010), 100--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Meyer, J. P., Paunonen, S. V., Gellatly, I. R., Goffin, R. D. and Jackson, D. N. Organizational commitment and job performance: It's the nature of the commitment that counts. Journal of Applied Psychology 74(1), 1989, 152--156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Nov, O. What motivates Wikipedians? Communications of the ACM 50, 11(2007), 60--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Prentice, D. A., Miller, D. T., and LightdaleI,J. R. Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20, 5 (1994), 484--49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Podolny, J. M., & Baron, J. N. Relationships and resources: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62, (1997), 673--693.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Randel, A.E. and Ranft, A. L. Motivations to maintain social ties with coworkers. Group and Organization Management 32, 2(2007), 208--232.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Ren, Y., Kraut, R. E., Kiesler, S., & Resnick, P. (2012). Encouraging commitment in online communities. In R. E. Kraut & P. Resnick (Eds.), Building successful online communities: Evidence-based social design (pp. 77--124). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Rogstadius, J., Kostakos, V., Kittur, A., Smus, B., Laredo, J., and Vukovic, M. An assessment of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on task quality in crowdsourcing markets. In Proc. ICWSM 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Ross, J., Irani, L., Silberman, M. S., Zaldivar, A., and Tomlinson, B. (2010). Who are the crowdworkers': shifting demographics in mechanical turk. In CHI EA'10: Proceedings of the 28th of the international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 2863--2872, New York, NY, USA. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Rousseau, D.M. Technological differences in job characteristics, employee satisfaction, and motivation: A synthesis of job design research and sociotechnical systems theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 19, 1 (1977), 18--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Salganik, M.J., Dodds, P.S., and Watts, D.J. Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311, 5762 (2006), 854--856.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Shaw, A.D., Horton, J.J., and Chen, D.L. Designing strategies for inexpert human raters. In Proc. CSCW 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Tang, T. L. and Sarsfield-Baldwin, L. The effects of self-esteem, task label, and performance feedback on task liking and intrinsic motivation. The Journal of Social Psychology 131, 4 (1991), 567--572.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Tang, J.C., Cebrian, M., Giacobe, N.A., Kim, H.W., Kim, T., and Wickert, D.B. Reflecting on the Darpa red balloon challenge. Comm. of the ACM 54, 4 (2011), 78--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Wang, Y., Kraut, R., and Levine, J. To stay or leave? The incentive of emotional and informational support to commitment in online health support groups. In Proc. CSCW 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Wiggins, G., Educative assessment. Designing assessments to inform and improve student quality. Jossey-Bass Publishers, CA, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhu, H., Kraut, R., and Kittur, A. Effectiveness of shared leadership in online communities. In Proc. CSCW 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Zhu, H., Kraut, R.E., & Kittur, A. Effects of Peer Feedback on Contribution: A Field Experiment in Wikipedia. In Proc. CHI 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A comparison of social, learning, and financial strategies on crowd engagement and output quality

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '14: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing
      February 2014
      1600 pages
      ISBN:9781450325400
      DOI:10.1145/2531602

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 February 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '14 Paper Acceptance Rate134of497submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader