skip to main content
10.1145/2538862.2538948acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Curriculum is not enough: the educational theory and research foundation of the exploring computer science professional development model

Published:05 March 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

In recent years, the computer science education community has shown strong commitment to broadening participation in computing in K-12 classrooms. Educational research highlights the critical role of professional development in supporting teachers to attract and effectively teach underrepresented students in computing. In this paper we present the Exploring Computer Science (ECS) professional development model and the research on which it is based. We also present findings about the impact of ECS professional development on teachers' practice. As computing education initiatives become increasingly concerned with scaling up from a regional to a nationwide presence, it is important to consider how the essential components of effective professional development can drive this reform.

References

  1. Aaronson, L. 2013. You don't need to be an expert. Weblog. Retrieved September 1, 2013 from http://leslieaaronson.weebly.com/1/category/all/1.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Aronson, E. and Bridgeman, D. 1979. Jigsaw groups and the desegregated classroom: In pursuit of common goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 4, 438--466.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Ball, D. L. 1993. With an Eye on the Mathematical Horizon: Dilemmas of Teaching Elementary School Mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 4, 373--397.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Barron, B. and Darling-Hammond, L. 2008. Teaching for meaningful learning. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Barton, A. C. and Tan, E. 2010. We be burnin'! Agency, identity, and science learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 2, 187--229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Boaler, J. 2008. Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach. Teachers College Press, 33, 4, 239--258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bransford, J., Brown, A. L. and Cocking, R. R. 1999. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, E. G. Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. 1994. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Darling-Hammond, L. 2008. Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Darling-Hammond, L. and Bransford, J. 2007. Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Darling-Hammond, L. and Richardson, N. 2009. Teacher learning: What matters. Educational Leadership, 66, 5, 46--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Goode, J. and Chapman, G. 2008. Exploring computer science. Computer Science Equity Alliance, Los Angeles, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Howard, T. 2010. Why race and culture matter in schools. Teachers College Press, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, R. T. 1989. Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Interaction Book Company, Edina, MN.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N. and Hewson, P. W. 2010. Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Corwin Pr, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Margolis, J., Estrella, R., Goode, J., Holme, J. J. and Nao, K. 2008. Stuck in the shallow end: Education, race, and computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. McLaughlin, M. W. and Talbert, J. E. 2001. Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. National Research Council. 2000. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S. and Silver, E. A. 1999. The development of professional developers: Learning to assist teachers in new settings in new ways. Harvard Educational Review, 69, 3, 237--270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W. Y., Scarloss, B. and Shapley, K. L. 2007. Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. Institution of Education Sciences, Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Curriculum is not enough: the educational theory and research foundation of the exploring computer science professional development model

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCSE '14: Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education
        March 2014
        800 pages
        ISBN:9781450326056
        DOI:10.1145/2538862

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 March 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGCSE '14 Paper Acceptance Rate108of274submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

        Upcoming Conference

        SIGCSE Virtual 2024

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader