skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557156acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Digitally driven: how location based services impact the work practices of London bus drivers

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper examines how an occupational group has adapted to the demands of working with a Location Based Service (LBS). Instead of following a rigid timetable, London's bus drivers are now required to maintain an equal distance between the bus in front and the one behind. Our qualitative study employs ethnographic fieldwork and in-depth semi-structured interviews to elicit drivers' perspectives of the new system and show how it has modified their driving and general work conditions. We explore how passengers influence the movement of the bus and how the technology frames bus drivers' relationships to their managers and commuters. This work contributes to our understanding of the impact of LBS in the workplace and shows how technological imperatives can be established that cause unanticipated consequences and gradually undermine human relationships.

References

  1. Ashok, A., Beck, C. and Quagliara, N. Ri-Ri: assisting bus conductors in madras (Chennai). In Proc. CHI EA 2007, ACM Press (2007), 2031--2036. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bain, P., and Taylor, P. Entrapped by the 'electronic panopticon' Worker resistance in the call centre. New Technology, Work and Employment 15, 1 (2000), 2--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Brush, A., Krumm, J. and Scott, J. Exploring end user preferences for location obfuscation, location-based services, and the value of location. In Proc. UbiComp 2010, ACM Press (2010), 95--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bhouri, N., Balbo, F., Pinson, S. and Tlig, M. Collaborative agents for modelling traffic regulation systems. In Proc. WI-IAT 2011, IEEE (2011), 7--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bijker, W.E. Of Bicycles, Bakelites and Bulbs: Towards a Theory of Socio-Technical Change. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Boesen, J., Rode, J. A., and Mancini, C. The panopticon: location tracking in families. Proc UbiComp 2010, ACM Press (2010), 65--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Consolvo, S., Smith, I. E., Mattews, T., LaMarca, A., Tabert, J. and Powlwdge, P. Location disclosure to social relations: why, when, & what people want to share. In Proc. CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 81--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dahl, Y. and Holbø, K. Value bias of sensor-based assistive technology: case study of GPS tracking system used in dementia care. In Proc. DIS 2012, ACM Press (2012), 572--581. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dodson, S. The next stop should be Helsinki. The Guardian, 28th February 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dziekan, K. and Kottenhoff, K. Dynamic at-stop realtime information displays for public transport: effects on customers. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 41, 6 (2007) 489--501.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Efimova, L. Weblog as personal thinking space. In Proc HT 2009, ACM Press (2009), 289--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Ellis, C. and Bochner, A. B. Auto-ethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 733--768. Sage, London, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Fallon, E., Bannon, L. and McCarthy, J. (Eds.) ALLFN 1997, Revisiting the Allocation of Functions Issue: New Perspectives. IEA Press (1997), 73--88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferris, B., Watkins, K. E. and Borning, A. Onebusaway: behavioural and satisfaction changes resulting from providing real-time arrival information for public transit. In Proc. of Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Foth, M., Schroeter, R. and Ti, J. Opportunities of public transport experience enhancements with mobile services and urban screens. IJACI 5, 1 (2013), 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ge, Y., Liu, C., Xiong, H. and Chen, J. A taxi business intelligence system. In Proc. SIGKDD 2011, ACM Press (2011), 735--738. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Transactions, Chicago, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Harper, R. H. R. Why Do People Wear Active Badges? Rank Xerox Research Centre, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Inglesant, P. and Sasse, M. Usability is the best policy: public policy and the lived experience of transport systems in London. In Proc. BCS-HCI 2007, BCS Press (2007), 35--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Junglas, I., and Spitzmüller, C. A research model for studying privacy concerns pertaining to location-based services. In Proc. HICSS 2005, IEEE Press, 180--189. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lathia, N. and Capra, L. How smart is your smartcard?: Measuring travel behaviours, perceptions, and incentives. In Proc. UbiComp 2011, ACM Press (2011), 291--300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lee, S. and Kleiner, B. H. Electronic surveillance in the workplace. Management Research News 26 (2/3/4) (2003), 72--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. McNamara, L., Mascolo, C. and Capra, L. Media sharing based on colocation prediction in urban transport. In Proc. MobiCom 2008, ACM Press (2008), 58--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Olson, J. S., Grudin, J. and Horvitz, E. A Study of Preferences for Sharing and Privacy. In Proc. CHI 2005, ACM (2005), 1985--1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Pace, T., Ramalingam, S. and Roedl, D. Celerometer and idling reminder: persuasive technology for school bus eco-driving. In Proc. CHI EA 2007, ACM Press (2007), 2085--2090. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Peng, J. A Survey of Location Based Service for Galileo System. In: proc. Computer Science and Computational Technology 2008, IEEE (2008), 737--741. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Sellen, A., Eardley, R., Izadi, S. and Harper, R. The whereabouts clock: early testing of a situated awareness device. In Proc. CHI EA 2006, ACM Press (2006), 1303--1312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Shklovski, I., Vertesi, J., Troshynski, E. and Dourish, P. The commodification of location: dynamics of power in location-based systems. In Proc. UbiComp 2009, ACM Press (2009), 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Spitzmüiller, C. and Stanton, J. M. Examining employee compliance with organizational surveillance and monitoring. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 79 (2010), 245--272.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Tenner, E. Why Things Bite Back: Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences. Vintage, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Tfl (2013) "Modes of Transport". Transport for London. http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/modesoftransportGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Thomas, L., Little, L., Briggs, P., McInnes, L., Jones, E. and Nicholson, J. Location tracking: views from the older adult population. Age and Ageing, (2013), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Van der Doef, M and Maes, S. The job demand-control (-support) model and psychological well-being: a review of 20 years of empirical research. Work & Stress 13 (1999), 87--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Vasalou, A., Oostveen, A. and Joinson, A. N. A case study of non-adoption: the value of location tracking in the family. In Proc. CSCW 2012, ACM Press (2012), 779--788. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Venard, O., Baudoin, G. and Uzan, G. Experiment and evaluation of the RAMPE interactive system for the mobility of blind people in public transport. In Proc. Assets20'08, ACM Press (2008), 271--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Workman, M. A field study of corporate employee monitoring: attitudes, absenteeism, and the moderating influences of procedural justice perceptions. Information and Organization 19 (2009), 218--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Wright, P., Dearden, A. and Fields, B. Function allocation: a perspective from studies of work practice. Int. J of Human Computer Studies 52, 2 (2000), 335355. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Zhou, T. The impact of privacy concern on user adoption of location-based service. International Management & Data Systems 111, 2 (2011), 212--226.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Zweig, D. and Webster, J. Where is the line between benign and invasive? An examination of psychological barriers to the acceptance of awareness monitoring systems. Journal of Organizational Behaviour 23 (2002), 605--633.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Digitally driven: how location based services impact the work practices of London bus drivers

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2014
      4206 pages
      ISBN:9781450324731
      DOI:10.1145/2556288

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader