skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557321acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A smartphone-based sensing platform to model aggressive driving behaviors

Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Driving aggressively increases the risk of accidents. Assessing a person's driving style is a useful way to guide aggressive drivers toward having safer driving behaviors. A number of studies have investigated driving style, but they often rely on the use of self-reports or simulators, which are not suitable for the real-time, continuous, automated assessment and feedback on the road. In order to understand and model aggressive driving style, we construct an in-vehicle sensing platform that uses a smartphone instead of using heavyweight, expensive systems. Utilizing additional cheap sensors, our sensing platform can collect useful information about vehicle movement, maneuvering and steering wheel movement. We use this data and apply machine learning to build a driver model that evaluates drivers' driving styles based on a number of driving-related features. From a naturalistic data collection from 22 drivers for 3 weeks, we analyzed the characteristics of drivers who have an aggressive driving style. Our model classified those drivers with an accuracy of 90.5% (violation-class) and 81% (questionnaire-class). We describe how, in future work, our model can be used to provide real-time feedback to drivers using only their current smartphone.

References

  1. Aggressive driving: research update, American Automobile Assoc. Foundation for Traffic Safety, (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Amditis, A., Pagle, K., Joshi, S., and Bekiaris, E. Drivervehicle-environment monitoring for on-board driver support systems: lessons learned from design and implementation. Applied Ergonomics 41, 2 (2010), 225235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Barkley, R.A. and Cox, C. A review of driving risks and impairments associated with attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder and the effects of stimulant medication on driving performance. Journal of Safety Research 38, 1 (2007), 113'128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Berdoulat, E., Vavassori, D., and Sastre, M. Driving anger, emotional and instrumental aggressiveness, and impulsiveness in the prediction of aggressive and transgressive driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention 50, (2013), 758--767.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Boyce, T.E. and Geller, E.S. An instrumented vehicle assessment of problem behavior and driving style: Do younger males really take more risks' Accident Analysis and Prevention 34, 1 (2002), 51--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cambridge Systematics. 2011. Crashes vs Congestion: What's the Cost to Society' American Automobile Association, (November 2011). Retrieved Sept. 5, 2013, http://newsroom.aaa.com/wp-content/uploads/ 2011/11/2011_AAA_CrashvCongUpd.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chilaoutakis, J.E., Demakakos, P., Tzamalouka, G., Bakou, V., Koumaki, M., and Darviri, C. Aggressive behavior while driving as predictor of self-reported car crashes. Journal of Safety Research 33, 4 (2002), 431443.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Coughlin, J.F., Reimer, B., and Mehler, B. Monitoring, managing, and motivating driver safety and well-being. Pervasive Computing IEEE 10, 3 (2011), 14--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Countermeasures that work: A highway safety countermeasure guide for state highway safety offices. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Fourth Edition. (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dahlen, E.R., Edwards, B.D., Tubre, T., Zyphur, M.J., and Warren, C.R. Taking a look behind the wheel: An investigation into the personality predictors of aggressive driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention 45, (2012), 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Deffenbacher, J.L., Oetting, E.R., and Lynch, R.S. Development of a driving anger scale. Psychological Reports 74, 1 (1994), 83--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Deffenbacher, J.L., Oetting, E.R., and Swaim, R.C. The Driving Anger Expression Inventory: A measure of how people express their anger on the road. Behavior Research and Therapy 40, 6 (2002), 7--737.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Dey, A.K., Wac, K., Ferreira, D., Tassini, K., Hong, J.H., and Ramos, J. Getting closer: an empirical investigation of the proximity of user to their smart phones. Ubicomp'11, (2011), 163--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Espinosa, F., Jimenez, J.A., Santiso, E., Gardel, A., Perez, D., Casanova, J. and Santos, C. Design and implementation of a portable electronic system for vehicle-driver-route activity measurement. Measurement 44, 2 (2011), 326--337.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Evans, L. 1991. Traffic Safety and the Driver. Van Nostrand, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hennessey, D. and Weisenthal, D.L. Traffic congestion, driver stress, and driver aggression. Aggressive Behavior 25, 6 (1999). 409--423Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Houston, J.M., Farris, P.B., and Norman, M. The aggressive driving behavior scale: developing a selfreport measure of unsafe driving practices. North American Journal of Psychology 5, 2 (2003), 269--278.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jensen, M., Wagner, J., and Alexander, K. Analysis of in-vehicle driver behaviour data for improved safety. Int'l Journal of Vehicle Safety 5, 3 (2011), 197--212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson, D.A. and Trivedi, M.M. Driving style recognition using a smartphone as a sensor platform. In Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, (2011), 1609--1615.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Kee, S., Shamsul, B, and Goh, Y Differences of drivers' driving performance in simulated driving. Research Journal of Applied Sciences 4, 6 (2009), 230--237.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lawton, R., Parker, D., Manstead, A.S.R., and Stradling, S.G. The role of affect in predicting social behaviors: the case of road traffic violations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 27, 14 (1997), 1258--1276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Li, K., Lu, M., Lu, F., Lv, Q., Shang, L., and Maksimovic, D. Personalized driving behavior monitoring and analysis and emerging hybrid vehicles. Pervasive (LNCS 7319), (2012), 1--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Malta, L., Miyajima, C. and Takeda, K. A study of driver behavior under potential threats in vehicle traffic. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 10, 2 (2009), 201--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Miyajima, C., Nishiwaki, Y., Ozawa, K., Wakita, T., Itou, K.,Takeda, K., and Itakura, F. Driver modeling based on driving behavior and its evaluation in driver identification. Proceedings of the IEEE 95, 2 (2007), 427--437.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Mohan, P., PadManabhan, V.N., and Ramjee, R. Nericell: rich monitoring of road and traffic conditions using mobile smartphones. SenSys'08, (2008), 323. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Mynttinen, S., Sundstrom, A., Vissers, J. Koivukoski, M., Hakuli, K., and Keskinen, E. Self-assessed driver competence among novice drivers ' a comparison of driving test candidate assessments and examiner assessments in a Dutch and Finnish sample. Journal of Safety Research 40, 4 (2009), 301--309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Neale, V.L., Dingus, T.A., Klauer, S., Sudweeks, J. and Goodman, M. An overview of the 100-car naturalistic study and findings. ESV Paper 05-0400, (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Nichols, J. 1998. New opportunities: Can behavior analysis help with traffic safety' Panel discussion (panel session). 24th Annual Convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Orlando, FL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Owsley, C. Driving mobility, older adults, and quality of life. Gerontechnology 1, 4 (2002), 220--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Özkan, T., Lajunen, T., Chliaoutakis, J.E., Parker, D., and Summala, H. Cross-cultural differences in driving behaviours: A comparison of six countries. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 9, 3 (2006), 227'242.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Paefgen, J., Kehr, F., Zhi, Y., and Michaelles, F. Driving behavior analysis with smartphones: insights from a controlled field study. In Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, (2012), 36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Reason, J., Manstead, A., Stradling, S., Baxter, J., and Campbell, K. Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction' Ergonomics 33, 10--11 (1990), 1315--1332.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Shinar, D. and Compton, R. Aggressive driving: an observational study of driver, vehicle, and situational variables, Accident Analysis and Prevention 36, 3 (2004), 429--437.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Sundstr'm, A. Self-assessment of driving skill ' A review from a measurement perspective. Transportation Research Part F, 11 (2008), 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Tasca, L. A review of the literature on aggressive driving research. Aggressive Driving Issues Conf, (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Toledo, T., Musicant, O., Lotan, T. In-vehicle data recorders for monitoring and feedback on drivers' behavior. Transportation Research Part C 16, 3 (2008), 320--331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Wiesenthal, D.L., Hennessy, D., and Gibson, P.M. The Driving Vengeance Questionnaire (DVQ): The development of a scale to measure deviant drivers' attitudes. Violence and Victims 15, 2 (2000), 115--136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Winter, J. and Dodou, D. The driver behavior questionnaire as a predictor of accidents: a meta-analysis. Journal of Safety Research 41, 6 (2010), 463--470.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. You, C.-W., Montes-de-Oca, M., Bao, T.J., Lane, N.D., Lu H., Cardone, G., Torresani, L., and Campbell, A.T. CarSafe: a driver safety app that detects dangerous driving behavior using dual-cameras on smartphones. Ubicomp'12, (2012), 671--672. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Zhang, Y., Lin, W.C., and Chin, Y.-K. A patternrecognition approach for driving skill characterization. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 11, 4 (2010), 905--916. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A smartphone-based sensing platform to model aggressive driving behaviors

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2014
      4206 pages
      ISBN:9781450324731
      DOI:10.1145/2556288

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader