skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557332acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Breakdown, obsolescence and reuse: HCI and the art of repair

Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes an integrated program of theoretical, ethnographic, and building work meant to explore post-humanist alternatives to questions around HCI creativity and design. We review recent theories in the humanities, social sciences, and HCI that argue for different ways of framing the relationship between human agents and the object world around them. We then describe a program of ethnographic work with artists who feature found and broken technologies as central methods and topics of work. Finally, we describe an installation and self-study project of our own, 'Scale,' that extends these lines of analysis through collaborative acts of building with broken and discarded technologies. We argue that such integrated programs of work offer one useful model for leveraging the theoretical, ethnographic and material dimensions of HCI work; and that the distinct 'propensities' of found and broken objects can challenge and extend HCI notions of creativity and design itself.

References

  1. Agamben, G. and Attell, K. The open: Man and animal. SciELO, Brasil, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Blevis, E. Sustainable interaction design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Boehner, K., Vertesi, J., Sengers, P., and Dourish, P. How HCI interprets the probes. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bogost, I. Alien Phenomenology, Or, What It's Like to be a Thing. U of Minnesota Press, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. DiSalvo, C., Boehner, K., Knouf, N.A., and Sengers, P. Nourishing the ground for sustainable HCI. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. DiSalvo, C. and Lukens, J. Nonanthropocentrism and the Nonhuman in Design: Possibilities for Designing New Forms of Engagement with and through Technology. In From Social Butterfly to Engaged Citizen, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ehn, P. Participation in design things. Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design, Indiana University, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gaver, W., Hooker, B., Dunne, A., and Farrington, P. The Presence Project, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gibson, J. Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology. In The Theory of Affordances. Hillsdale, NJ, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Haraway, D. When species meet. University of Minnesota Press, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Harman, G. The quadruple object. University of Minnesota Press, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Harman, G. Tool-being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. Open Court Publishing, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hutchins, E. Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jackson, S., Pompe, A., and Krieshok, G. Things fall apart: maintenance, repair, and technology for education initiatives in rural Namibia. Proceedings of the 2011 iConference, ACM Press, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jackson, S.J., Pompe, A., and Krieshok, G. Repair worlds. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM Press, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jackson, S.J. Rethinking Repair. In T. Gillespie, P. Boczkowski, and K. Foot, eds. Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality and Society. MIT Press, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jacucci, G. and Wagner, I. Performative roles of materiality for collective creativity. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Creativity & Cognition, ACM Press, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Jullien, F. and Lloyd, J. The propensity of things: Toward a history of efficacy in China. Zone, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jullien, F. A treatise on efficacy: Between Western and Chinese thinking. University of Hawaii Press, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Latour, B. The Politics of Nature, tr. Catherine Porter. Harvard University Press, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Latour, B. Reassembling the social-an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Lowgren, J. and Stolterman, E. Thoughtful interaction design: A design perspective on information technology. MIT Press, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lynch, M. Ontography: Investigating the production of things, deflating ontology. Social Studies of Science, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Meillassoux, Q., Badiou, A., and Brassier, R. After finitude: An essay on the necessity of contingency. Continuum, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Norman, D. The design of everyday things. Basic Books, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Ratto, M. Critical Making: conceptual and material studies in technology and social life. The Information Society, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Robles, E. and Wiberg, M. Texturing the material turn in interaction design. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, ACM Press, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Rosner, D. and Taylor, A. Antiquarian answers: book restoration as a resource for design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Schön, D. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Serres, M. The Parasite, trans. LR Schehr. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Suchman, L. Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Tholander, J., Normark, M., and Rossitto, C. Understanding agency in interaction design materials. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Wien, K. Unfixable, Unhackable, Untenable. WIRED, 2012. http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/06/opinionapple-retina-displa/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Breakdown, obsolescence and reuse: HCI and the art of repair

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2014
      4206 pages
      ISBN:9781450324731
      DOI:10.1145/2556288

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader