skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557372acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding quantified-selfers' practices in collecting and exploring personal data

Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Researchers have studied how people use self-tracking technologies and discovered a long list of barriers including lack of time and motivation as well as difficulty in data integration and interpretation. Despite the barriers, an increasing number of Quantified-Selfers diligently track many kinds of data about themselves, and some of them share their best practices and mistakes through Meetup talks, blogging, and conferences. In this work, we aim to gain insights from these "extreme users," who have used existing technologies and built their own workarounds to overcome different barriers. We conducted a qualitative and quantitative analysis of 52 video recordings of Quantified Self Meetup talks to understand what they did, how they did it, and what they learned. We highlight several common pitfalls to self-tracking, including tracking too many things, not tracking triggers and context, and insufficient scientific rigor. We identify future research efforts that could help make progress toward addressing these pitfalls. We also discuss how our findings can have broad implications in designing and developing self-tracking technologies.

References

  1. Ali, A.A., Hossain, S.M., Hovsepian, K., Rahman, M.M., Plarre, K., & Kumar, S. mPuff: automated detection of cigarette smoking puffs from respiration measurements. IPSN '12, (2012), 269--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bentley, F. et al. Health Mashups: Presenting statistical patterns between wellbeing data and context in natural language to promote behavior change. ToCHI, (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Beyer, H. & Holtzblatt, K. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann (1998). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Consolvo, S. et al. Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of Ubifit garden. CHI '08, (2008), 1797--806. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. d3. d3js.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fitbit. http://www.fitbit.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Fox, S., & Duggan, M. Tracking for health. Pew Internet & American Life Project, January 28, 2013. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Tracking-forHealth.aspx, accessed on September 17, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Google Charts. https://developers.google.com/chart.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jawbone UpBand. https://jawbone.com/up.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kandel, S., Paepcke, A., Hellerstein, J., & Heer, J. Wrangler: Interactive visual specification of data transformation scripts. CHI '11, (2011), 3363--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kay, M. et al. Lullaby: a capture & access system for understanding the sleep environment. UbiComp '12, (2012), 226--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kazdin, A.E. Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. Oxford University Press (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Klasnja, P., & Pratt, W. Healthcare in the pocket: Mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions. J Biomed Inform 1 (2012), 184--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kopp, J. Self-monitoring: A literature review of research and practice. Social Work Research & Abstracts 24, 4, Oxford University Press (1988), 8--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Korotitsch, W.J., & Nelson-Gray, R.O. An overview of self-monitoring research in assessment and treatment. Psychological Assessment 11(4) (1999), 415--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. larklife. http://lark.com/products/larklife/experience.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Li, I., Dey, A., & Forlizzi, J. A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. CHI '10, (2010), 557--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Li, I., Dey, A., & Forlizzi, J. Understanding my data, myself: supporting self-reflection with Ubicomp technologies. UbiComp '11, (2011), 405--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lin, J.J., Mamykina, L., Lindtner, S., Delajoux, G., Strub, H. Fish-n-Steps: encouraging physical activity with an interactive computer game. UbiComp '06, (2006), 261--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Mamykina, L., Mynatt, E., Davidson, P., Greenblatt, D. MAHI: investigation of social scaffolding for reflective thinking in diabetes management. CHI '08, (2008), 477--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Morris, M., & Guilak, F. Mobile heart health: project highlight. Pervasive Computing 8(2) (2009), 57--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Nike Fuelband. http://www.nike.com/cdp/fuelband.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Patel, R.A., Klasnja, P., Hartzler, A., Unruh, K.T., & Pratt, W. Probing the benefits of real-time tracking during cancer care. AMIA '12 Fall Symposium, (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Quantified Mind. http://www.quantified-mind.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Quantified Self. http://quantifiedself.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosenthal, R. Experimenter effects in behavioral research. Appleton-Century-Crofts (1966).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Swan, M. Emerging patient-driven health care models: an examination of health social networks, consumer personalized medicine and quantified self-tracking. Int J Environ Res Public Health 6(2) (2009), 492--525.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Technology Review. http://www.technologyreview.com /news/514356/stephen-wolfram-on-personal-analytics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Troshynski, E., Lee, C., & Dourish, P. Accountabilities of presence: reframing location-based systems. CHI '08, (2008), 487--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Wolfram. http://www.wolfram.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Zeo. http://myzeo.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Understanding quantified-selfers' practices in collecting and exploring personal data

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2014
        4206 pages
        ISBN:9781450324731
        DOI:10.1145/2556288

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 April 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader