skip to main content
10.1145/2567948.2577311acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Allocating tasks to workers with matching constraints: truthful mechanisms for crowdsourcing markets

Published:07 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Designing optimal pricing policies and mechanisms for allocating tasks to workers is central to the online crowdsourcing markets. In this paper, we consider the following realistic setting of online crowdsourcing markets -- there is a requester with a limited budget and a heterogeneous set of tasks each requiring certain skills; there is a pool of workers and each worker has certain expertise and interests which define the set of tasks she can and is willing to do. Under the matching constraints given by this bipartite graph between workers and tasks, we design our incentive-compatible mechanism truthuniform which allocates the tasks to the workers, while ensuring budget feasibility and achieves near-optimal utility for the requester. Apart from strong theoretical guarantees, we carry out experiments on a realistic case study of Wikipedia translation project on Mechanical Turk. We note that this is the first paper to address this setting from a mechanism design perspective.

References

  1. D. E. Difallah, G. Demartini, and P. Cudré-Mauroux. Pick-a-crowd: tell me what you like, and i'll tell you what to do. In WWW, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. G. Goel and A. Mehta. Online budgeted matching in random input models with applications to adwords. In SODA, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. G. Goel, A. Nikzad, and A. Singla. Matching workers expertise with tasks: Incentives in heterogeneous crowdsourcing markets. In NIPS Workshop on Crowdsourcing, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C.-J. Ho and J. W. Vaughan. Online task assignment in crowdsourcing markets. In AAAI, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Y. Singer. Budget feasible mechanisms. In FOCS, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Singla and A. Krause. Incentives for privacy tradeoff in community sensing. In HCOMP, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Allocating tasks to workers with matching constraints: truthful mechanisms for crowdsourcing markets

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WWW '14 Companion: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web
      April 2014
      1396 pages
      ISBN:9781450327459
      DOI:10.1145/2567948

      Copyright © 2014 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 April 2014

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader