skip to main content
10.1145/258492.258513acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspaaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Temporal notions of synchronization and consistency in Beehive

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 June 1997Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.H. Abdel-Shafi, J. C. Hall, S. V. Adve, and V. S. Adve. An Evaluation of Fine-Grain Producer-Initiated Communication in Cache-Coherent Multiprocessors. In Third International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture, February 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.R. H. Arpaci, A. M. Vahdat, T. Anderson, and D. Patterson. Combining Parallel and Sequential Workloads on a Network of Workstations.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.J. B. Carter, J. K. Bennett, and W. Zwaenepoel. Implementation and Performance of Munin. In The 13th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, October 1991.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.K.M. Chandy and J. Misra. Distributed simulation: A case study in design and verification of distributed programs. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-5(5):440-452, September 1979.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.E Dahlgren and P. Stenstrom. Using Write Caches to Improve Performance of Cache Coherence Protocols in Shared Memory Multiprocessors. Technical report, Department of Computer Engineering, Lund University, April 1993.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.R. M. Fujimoto. Parallel discrete event simulation. Communications of the ACM, 33(10):30-53, October 1990.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.K. Gharachorloo, D. Lenoski, J. Laudon, P. Gibbons, A. Gupta, and J. L. Hennessy. Memory Consistency and Event Ordering in Scalable Shared-Memory Multiprocessors. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pages 15-26, May 1990.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.J. R. Goodman. Cache consistency and sequential consistency. Technical Report Technical Report #1006, University of Wisconsin, Madison, February 1991.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.J. Hodgins, W. Wooten, D. Brogan, and J. O'Brien. Animating Human Athletics. In ACM SIGGRAPH 95 Computer Graphics Proceedings, pages 71-78, August 1995.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.D. R. Jefferson. Virtual Time. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 7(3):404-425, July 1985.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.P. Keleher, S. Dwarkadas, A.L. Cox, and W. Zwaenepoel. TreadMarks: Distributed Shared Memory on Standard Workstations and Operating Systems. In Proceedings of the Winter 94 Usenix Conference, pages 115-131, January 1994.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.L. Kontothanassis, G. Hunt, et al. VM-based Shared Memory on Low Latency Remote Memory Access Networks. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.D. A. Koufaty, X. Chen, D. K. Poulsen, and J. Torrellas. Data forwarding in scalable shared memory multiprocessors. In Ninth ACM International Conference on Supercomputing, pages 255-264, July 1995.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.L. Lamport. How to make a Multiprocessor Computer that Correctly executes Multiprocess Programs. IEEE Transactions on Computer S3'stems, C-28(9), 1979.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.D. Lenoski, J. Laudon, T. Joe, D. Nakahira, L. Stevens, A. Gupta, and J. Hennessy. The DASH prototype: Logic overhead and performance. Transactions on parallel and distributed systems, 4( 1 ): 41-61, January 1993.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.K. Li and P. Hudak. Memory Coherence in Shared Virtual Memory Systems. ACM TOCS, 7(4):321-359, November 1989.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.E Mattern, M. Cosnard, Y. Robert, P. Quinton, and M. Raynal. Virtual Time and Global States of Distributed Systems. In International Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Algorithms, October 1988.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.S. Pakin, M. Lauria, et al. Fast Messages (FM) 2.0 User Documentation.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.U. Ramachandran, G. Shah, A. Sivasubramaniam, A. Singla, and I. Yanasak. Architectural Mechanisms for Explicit Communication in Shared Memory Multiprocessors. In Proceedings of Supercomputing '95, December 1995.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.E. Rosti et al. The KSRI: Experimentation and modeling of poststore. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMET- RICS 1993 Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, Santa Clara, CA, 1993.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.D. J. Scales, K. Gharachorloo, and C. A. Thekkath. Shasta: A Low Overhead, Software-Only Approach for Supporting Fine-Grain Shared Memory. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, October 1996.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22.K. Schwan and H. Zhou. Dynamic Scheduling of Hard Real-Time Tasks and Real-Time Threads. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 18(8):736-748, August 1992.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23.S. K. Singhal. Effective Remote Modeling in Large- Scale Distributed Simulation and Visualization Environments. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, August 1996.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24.A. Singla, U. Ramachandran, and J. Hodgins. Temporal notions of Synchronization and Consistency in Beehive. Technical Report GIT-CC-96-27, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, October 1996.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.Z. Xiao, F. Gomes, B. Unger, and J. Cleary. A fast asynchronous GVT algorithm for shared memory multiprocessor architectures. In Ninth Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Simulation, 1995.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. 26.R. Yavatkar. MCP: a protocol for coordination and temporal synchronization in multimedia collaborative applications. In 12th bTternational Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, June 1992.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Temporal notions of synchronization and consistency in Beehive

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Conferences
                  SPAA '97: Proceedings of the ninth annual ACM symposium on Parallel algorithms and architectures
                  June 1997
                  331 pages
                  ISBN:0897918908
                  DOI:10.1145/258492

                  Copyright © 1997 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 1 June 1997

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • Article

                  Acceptance Rates

                  SPAA '97 Paper Acceptance Rate32of97submissions,33%Overall Acceptance Rate447of1,461submissions,31%

                  Upcoming Conference

                  SPAA '24

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader