skip to main content
10.1145/2597176.2578267acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Mixing Tile Resolutions in Tiled Video: A Perceptual Quality Assessment

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 March 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

The mismatch between increasingly large video resolution and constrained screen size of mobile devices has led to the proposal of zoomable video systems based on tiled video. In the current system, a tiled video frame is constructed from multiple tiles in a single resolution stream. In this paper, we explore the perceptual effect of mixed-resolution tiles in tiled video, in which tiles within a video frame could come from streams with different resolutions, with the aim to tradeoff bandwidth and perceptual video quality. To understand how users perceive the video quality of mixed-resolution tiled video, we conducted a psychophysical study with 50 participants on tiled videos where the tile resolutions are randomly chosen from two resolution levels with equal probability. The experiment results show that in many cases, we can mix tiles from HD (1920×1080p) stream and tiles from 1600×900p stream without being noticed by the viewers. Even when participants notice quality degradation in videos combined with tiles from HD stream and tiles from 960×540p stream, the majority of participants still accept the degradation when viewing videos with low and medium motion; and greater than 40% of participants accept the quality degradation when viewing video with dense motion.

References

  1. D Varuna SX De Silva, Warnakulasuriya Anil Chandana Fernando, Gokce Nur, Erhan Ekmekcioglu, and Stewart T Worrall. 3d video assessment with just noticeable difference in depth evaluation. In Image Processing (ICIP), 2010 17th IEEE International Conference on, pages 4013--4016. IEEE, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Wu-chi Feng, Thanh Dang, John Kassebaum, and Tim Bauman. Supporting region-of-interest cropping through constrained compression. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 745--748. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Wu-chi Feng, Thanh Dang, John Kassebaum, and Tim Bauman. Supporting region-of-interest cropping through constrained compression. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMCCAP), 7(3):17, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. George A Gescheider. Psychophysics: the fundamentals. Psychology Press, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Aditya Mavlankar, Pierpaolo Baccichet, David Varodayan, and Bernd Girod. Optimal slice size for streaming regions of high resolution video with virtual pan/tilt/zoom functionality. In EUSIPCO, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Aditya Mavlankar, David Varodayan, and Bernd Girod. Region-of-interest prediction for interactively streaming regions of high resolution video. In Packet Video. IEEE, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ngo Quang Minh Khiem, Guntur Ravindra, Axel Carlier, and Wei Tsang Ooi. Supporting zoomable video streams with dynamic region-of-interest cropping. In MMSys. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ngo Quang Minh Khiem, Guntur Ravindra, and Wei Tsang Ooi. Adaptive encoding of zoomable video streams based on user access pattern. In MMSys. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Aniruddha Sinha, Gaurav Agarwal, and Alwin Anbu. Region-of-interest based compressed domain video transcoding scheme. In Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2004. Proceedings.(ICASSP'04). IEEE International Conference on, volume 3, pages iii--161. IEEE, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ray van Brandenburg, Omar Niamut, Martin Prins, and Hans Stokking. Spatial segmentation for immersive media delivery. In ICIN. IEEE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Haohong Wang and Khaled El-Maleh. Joint adaptive background skipping and weighted bit allocation for wireless video telephony. In Wireless Networks, Communications and Mobile Computing, 2005 International Conference on, volume 2, pages 1243--1248. IEEE, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Haohong Wang, Yi Liang, and Khaled El-Maleh. Real-time region-of-interest video coding using content-adaptive background skipping with dynamic bit reallocation. In Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2006. ICASSP 2006 Proceedings. 2006 IEEE International Conference on, volume 2, pages II--II. IEEE, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Wanmin Wu, Ahsan Arefin, Gregorij Kurillo, Pooja Agarwal, Klara Nahrstedt, and Ruzena Bajcsy. Color-plus-depth level-of-detail in 3d tele-immersive video: a psychophysical approach. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 13--22. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Mixing Tile Resolutions in Tiled Video: A Perceptual Quality Assessment

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        NOSSDAV '14: Proceedings of Network and Operating System Support on Digital Audio and Video Workshop
        March 2014
        125 pages
        ISBN:9781450327060
        DOI:10.1145/2597176

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 March 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • tutorial
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        NOSSDAV '14 Paper Acceptance Rate18of56submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate118of363submissions,33%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader