skip to main content
10.1145/2598510.2598594acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A qualitative study of workplace intercultural communication tensions in dyadic face-to-face and computer-mediated interactions

Published:21 June 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present findings from a qualitative study with 28 participants of the dyadic intercultural communication tensions professionals experience in Face-to-Face (FTF) and Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) workplace interactions. We identify four categories of intercultural communication tensions that emerged most frequently in our dataset including range of emotional expression, level of formality, "fixed" versus flexible appointments and task versus social-orientation. We discuss how these tensions manifested in FTF and CMC media and unravel the ways media supports or hinders intercultural communication. We present the adaptations participants made to mitigate such tensions and offer implications for design. Our findings demonstrate that the most frequently occurring intercultural communication tensions manifested in both FTF and CMC, regardless of the medium used. This indicates that cultural communication challenges will persist no matter the medium, highlighting the opportunity for technologies to better support workplace intercultural communication.

References

  1. Abowd, D., Dey, A.K., Orr, R., Brotherton, J. Contextawareness in wearable and ubiquitous computing. Virtual Reality, (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Anawati, D., Craig, A. Behavioral adaptation within cross-cultural teams. Prof. Comm., (2006), 49(1), 44--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Ballendat, T., Marquardt, N., Greenberg, S. Proxemic interaction: Designing for a proximity and orientationaware environment. Int. Tabletops and Surfaces, (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Beyene, T., Hinds, P., Cramton, C.D. Walking through jelly: Language proficiency, emotions and disrupted collaboration in global work, Harv. Bus. School, (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bly, S.A., Harrison, S.R., Irwin, S. Media spaces: bringing people together in video, audio and computing environment. Comm. of the ACM, (1993). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Carte, T and L. Chidambaram. A capabilities-based theory of technology deployment in diverse teams. J. of the Association for Information Sys, (2004), 17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cramton, C.D., Hinds, P.J. An embedded model of cultural adaptation in global teams.Org. Science, (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H., Trevino, L.K. Message equivocality, media selection and manager performance. MIS Quarterly, (1987). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S. Rethinking media richness: Towards a theory of media synchronicity. System Sciences, (1999), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Derks, D., Fischer, A.H., Bos, A.E. The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, (2008), 24(3), 766--785. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Diamant, E.I., Fussell, S.R., Lo, F.L. Where did we turn wrong? Unpacking the effect of culture and technology on attributions of team performance. CSCW, (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gilbert, E. Phrases that signal workplace hierarchy. CSCW, (2012), 1037--1046. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hall, E.T. Beyond Culture. Anchor Books. 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hancock, J.T., Gee, K., Ciaccio, K., Lin, J.M.H. I'm sad you're sad:emotional contagion in CMC.CSCW, (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Harrison, D.A., Price, K.H., and Bell, M.P. Beyond relational demography: Time and effects of surface and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Mgmt Journal, (1998), 41(1), 96--107.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hofstede, G. Culture's Consequences. Sage Publications. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang, H., Trauth, E.M. Cultural influences and globally distributed information systems development. ACM SIGMIS CPR, (2007), 36--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kayan, S., Fussell, S.R., Setlock, L.D. Cultural differences in the use of Instant Messaging in Asia and North America. CSCW, (2006). 525--528. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kosuge, K. and Hirata, Y. Human-robot interaction. ROBIO, (2004).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Kroeber, A.L., Kluckhohn, C., Untereiner, W., Meyer, A.G. Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. New York: Vintage Books. 1952.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Laroche, L. Managing cultural diversity in technical professions. Routledge. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee, O. The role of cultural protocol in media choice in a Confucian virtual workplace. Prof. Comm, (2000).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Li, I, Dey, A., Forlizzi, J., Höök, K., Medynskiy, Y. Personal informatics and HCI: design, theory, and social implications. CHI Extended Abstracts, (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Neuliep, J.W. Intercultural communication: A contextual approach. Houghton Mifflin Company. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Nguyen, D.T., Fussell, S.R. Effects of message content on cognitive and affective processes in cross-culture and same-culture IM conversations. CSCW, (2013), 19--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Picard, R.W. Affective computing. MIT Press. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Powell, A., Piccoli, G., Ives, B. Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research. ACM Sigmis Database, (2004), 6--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Reinecke, K., Bernstein, A. culturally adaptive software. moving beyond internationalization. Usability and Internationalization. (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Reinecke, K., Nguyen, M.K., Bernstein, A., Naef, M., Gajos, K.Z. Doodle around the world. CSCW, (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Richardson, R.M., Smith, S.W. The influence of high/low-context culture and power distance on choice of communication media. Int. J. of Intercultural Relations, (2007), 31(4), 479--501.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Setlock, L.D., Fussell, S.R., Neuwirth, C. Taking it out of context: collaborating within and across cultures in face-to-face settings and via IM. CSCW, (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Setlock, L.D., Quinones, P.A. and Fussell, S.R. Does culture interact with media richness? The effects of audio vs. video conferencing on Chinese and American dyads. System Sciences, (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Shachaf, P. Cultural diversity and information and communication technology impacts on global virtual teams: An exploratory study. Info. and Mgmt, (2008),45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Srite, M., Karahanna, E. The role of espoused national culture values in technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly, (2006), 30(3), 679--704. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Stahl, G.K., Maznevski, M.L., Voigt, A., Jonsen, K. Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams. J. of Int. Business Studies, (2009), 690--709.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Walther, J.B. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction. Comm. Research, (1992), 52--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Wang, H.C., Fussell, S.F., Setlock, L.D. Cultural difference and adaptation of communication styles in computer-mediated group brainstorming. CHI, (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Watson, W.E., Kamalesh, K., Michaelsen, L.K. Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance. Academy of Mgmt. J., (1993), 36(3).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Yuan, C.W., Setlock, L.D., Cosley, D., and Fussell, S. R. Understanding informal communication in multilingual contexts. CSCW, (2013), 909--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Zakaria, N., Talib, A.N.A. What did you say? A crosscultural analysis of the distributive communicative behaviors of global virtual teams. CASoN, (2011), 7--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A qualitative study of workplace intercultural communication tensions in dyadic face-to-face and computer-mediated interactions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '14: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems
      June 2014
      1102 pages
      ISBN:9781450329026
      DOI:10.1145/2598510

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 June 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      DIS '14 Paper Acceptance Rate107of402submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader