skip to main content
10.1145/2600057.2602886acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

The wisdom of smaller, smarter crowds

Published:01 June 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

The "wisdom of crowds" refers to the phenomenon that aggregated predictions from a large group of people can rival or even beat the accuracy of experts. In domains with substantial stochastic elements, such as stock picking, crowd strategies (e.g. indexing) are difficult to beat. However, in domains in which some crowd members have demonstrably more skill than others, smart sub-crowds could possibly outperform the whole. The central question this work addresses is whether such smart subsets of a crowd can be identified a priori in a large-scale prediction contest that has substantial skill and luck components. We study this question with data obtained from fantasy soccer, a game in which millions of people choose professional players from the English Premier League to be on their fantasy soccer teams. The better the professional players do in real life games, the more points fantasy teams earn. Fantasy soccer is ideally suited to this investigation because it comprises millions of individual-level, within-subject predictions, past performance indicators, and the ability to test the effectiveness of arbitrary player-selection strategies. We find that smaller, smarter crowds can be identified in advance and that they beat the wisdom of the larger crowd. We also show that many players would do better by simply imitating the strategy of a player who has done well in the past. Finally, we provide a theoretical model that explains the results we see from our empirical analyses.

References

  1. BRUCE, R. S. 1935-'1936. Group judgements in the fields of lifted weights and visual discrimination. Journal of Psychology 1, 117'-121.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. FAMA, E. F. AND FRENCH, K. R. 2010. Luck versus skill in the cross-section of mutual fund returns. The Journal of Finance LXV, 5, 1915-'1947.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. GALTON, F. 1907a. Letters to the editor. Nature 75, 1952.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. GALTON, F. 1907b. Vox populi. Nature 75, 1949, 450--451.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. GIGERENZER, G. 2008. Why heuristics work. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3, 1, 20-'29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. GORDON, K. 1924. Group judgements in the field of lifted weights. Journal of Experimental Psychology 7, 389-'400.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. HERZOG, S.M. AND HERTWIG, R. 2009. The wisdom of many in one mind: Improving individual judgments with dialectical bootstrapping. Psychological Science 20, 231--237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. KLUGMAN, S. F. 1945. Group judgement for familiar and unfamiliar materials. Journal of Genetic Psychology 32, 103-'110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. KNIGHT, H. 1921. A comparison of the reliability of group and individual judgements. M.S. thesis, Columbia University. unpublished.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. LEVITT, S. D.,MILES, T. J., AND ROSENFIELD, A. M. 2012. Is texas hold'em a game of chance' a legal and economic analysis. The Georgetown Law Journal 101, 581-'636.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. LORENZ, J., RAUHUT, H., SCHWEITZER, F., AND HELBING, D. 2011. How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 22, 9020'-9025.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. LORGE, I., FOX, D., DAVITZ, J., AND BRENNER, M. 1958. A survey of studies contrasting the quality of group performance and individual performance, 1920--1957. Psychological Bulletin 55, 6, 337-'372.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. MANNES, A. E., SOLL, J. B., AND LARRICK, R. P. 2013. The wisdom of small crowds. Manuscript in Preparation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. MCMURRAY, J. C. 2013. Aggregating information by voting: The wisdom of the experts versus the wisdom of the masses. The Review of Economic Studies 80, 1, 277-'312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. MUCHNIK, L., ARAL, S., AND TAYLOR, S. J. 2013. Social influence bias: A randomized experiment. Science 341, 6146, 647'-651.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. SIMMONS, J. P., NELSON, L. D., GALAK, J., AND FREDERICK, S. 2011. Intuitive biases in choice vs. estimation: Implications for the wisdom of crowds. Journal of Consumer Research 38, 1, 1-'15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. SUROWIECKI, J. 2005. The Wisdom of Crowds. Anchor. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. TREYNOR, J. L. 1987. Market efficiency and the bean jar experiment. Financial Analysts Journal 43, 3, 50-'53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The wisdom of smaller, smarter crowds

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      EC '14: Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation
      June 2014
      1028 pages
      ISBN:9781450325653
      DOI:10.1145/2600057

      Copyright © 2014 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 June 2014

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      EC '14 Paper Acceptance Rate80of290submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate664of2,389submissions,28%

      Upcoming Conference

      EC '24
      The 25th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
      July 8 - 11, 2024
      New Haven , CT , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader