skip to main content
research-article

Theory and analysis of generalized mixing and dilution of biochemical fluids using digital microfluidic biochips

Published:06 October 2014Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Digital microfluidic (DMF) biochips are recently being advocated for fast on-chip implementation of biochemical laboratory assays or protocols, and several algorithms for diluting and mixing of reagents have been reported. However, all methods for such automatic sample preparation suffer from a drawback that they assume the availability of input fluids in pure form, that is, each with an extreme concentration factor (CF) of 100%. In many real-life scenarios, the stock solutions consist of samples/reagents with multiple CFs. No algorithm is yet known for preparing a target mixture of fluids with a given ratio when its constituents are supplied with random concentrations. An intriguing question is whether or not a given target ratio is feasible to produce from such a general input condition. In this article, we first study the feasibility properties for the generalized mixing problem under the (1:1) mix-split model with an allowable error in the target CFs not exceeding 1 2d, where the integer d is user specified and denotes the desired accuracy level of CF. Next, an algorithm is proposed which produces the desired target ratio of N reagents in ONd mix-split steps, where N ( ≥ 3) denotes the number of constituent fluids in the mixture. The feasibility analysis also leads to the characterization of the total space of input stock solutions from which a given target mixture can be derived, and conversely, the space of all target ratios, which are derivable from a given set of input reagents with arbitrary CFs. Finally, we present a generalized algorithm for diluting a sample S in minimum (1:1) mix-split steps when two or more arbitrary concentrations of S (diluted with the same buffer) are supplied as inputs. These results settle several open questions in droplet-based algorithmic microfluidics and offer efficient solutions for a wider class of on-chip sample preparation problems.

References

  1. M. Abdelgawad and A. R. Wheeler. 2009. The digital revolution: A new paradigm for microfluidics. Adv. Mater. 21, 920--925.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. S. Bhattacharjee, A. Banerjee, and B. B. Bhattacharya. 2012. Multiple dilution sample preparation using digital microfluidic biochips. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Electronic System Design. 188--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Bhattacharjee, A. Banerjee, and B. B. Bhattacharya. 2014. Sample preparation with multiple dilutions on digital microfluidic biochips. IET Comput. Digital Tech. 8, 1, 49--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. S. Bhattacharjee, A. Banerjee, T.-Y. Ho, K. Chakrabarty, and B. B. Bhattacharya. 2013. Algorithms for producing linear dilution gradient with digital microfluidics. CoRR abs/1307.1251.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. K. Chakrabarty and T. Xu. 2010. Digital Microfluidic Biochips: Design and Optimization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Chatterjee, B. Hetayothin, A. R. Wheeler, D. J. King, and R. L. Garrell. 2006. Droplet-based microfluidics with nonaqueous solvents and solutions. Lab-on-a-Chip 6, 199--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. T.-W. Chiang, C.-H. Liu, and J.-D. Huang. 2013. Graph-based optimal reactant minimization for sample preparation on digital microfluidic biochips. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on VLSI Design, Automation, and Test. 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. K. Cho, H. M., and C.-J. Kim. 2003. Creating, transporting, cutting, and merging liquid droplets by electrowetting-based actuation for digital microfluidic circuits. J. Microelectromechanical Syst. 12, 1, 70--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. N. J. Cira, J. Y. Ho, M. E. Dueck, and D. B. Weibel. 2012. A self-loading microfluidic device for determining the minimum inhibitory concentration of antibiotics. Lab-on-a-Chip 12, 6, 1052--1059.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. T. A. Dinh, S. Yamashita, and T.-Y. Ho. 2014. A network-flow-based optimal sample preparation algorithm for digital microfluidic biochips. In Proceedings of the Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference. 225--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. R. B. Fair. 2007. Digital microfluidics: Is a true lab-on-a-chip possible? Microfluid. Nanofluid. 3, 245--281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. R. B. Fair, A. Khlystov, T. D. Tailor, V. Ivanov, R. D. Evans, P. B. Griffin, V. Srinivasan, V. K. Pamula, M. G. Pollack, and J. Zhou. 2007. Chemical and biological applications of digital-microfluidic devices. IEEE Des. Test Comput. 24, 1, 10--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Y. Fouillet, D. Jary, C. Chabrol, P. Claustre, and C. Peponnet. 2008. Digital microfluidic design and optimization of classic and new fluidic functions for lab on a chip systems. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 4, 3, 159--165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson. 1979. Computers and Intractability, A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W.H. Freeman and Company. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. E. J. Griffith, S. Akella, and M. K. Goldberg. 2006. Performance characterization of a reconfigurable planar-array digital microfluidic system. IEEE Trans. CAD 25, 2, 345--357. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. K. E. Herold and A. Rasooly. 2009. Lab-on-a-Chip Technology (Vol. 1): Fabrication and Microfluidics. Caister Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Y.-L. Hsieh, T.-Y. Ho, and K. Chakrabarty. 2012. A reagent-saving mixing algorithm for preparing multiple-target biochemical samples using digital microfluidics. IEEE Trans. CAD 31, 11, 1656--1669. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Y.-L. Hsieh, T.-Y. Ho, and K. Chakrabarty. 2014. Biochip synthesis and dynamic error recovery for sample preparation using digital microfluidics. IEEE Trans. CAD 33, 2, 183--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J.-D. Huang, C.-H. Liu, and T.-W. Chiang. 2012. Reactant minimization during sample preparation on digital microfluidic biochips using skewed mixing trees. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer-Aided Design. 377--384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J.-D. Huang, C.-H. Liu, and H.-S. Lin. 2013. Reactant and waste minimization in multitarget sample preparation on digital microfluidic biochips. IEEE Trans. CAD 32, 10, 1484--1494. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. T.-W. Huang and T.-Y. Ho. 2011. A two-stage ILP-based droplet routing algorithm for pin-constrained DMF biochips. IEEE Trans. CAD 30, 2, 215--228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. T.-W. Huang, C.-H. Lin, and T.-Y. Ho. 2010. A contamination aware droplet routing algorithm for the synthesis of digital microfluidic biochips. IEEE Trans. CAD 19, 11, 1682--1695. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. M. J. Jebrail and A. R. Wheeler. 2009. Digital microfluidic method for protein extraction by precipitation. Anal. Chim. Acta 81, 1, 330--335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. J. Kleinberg and E. Tardos. 2005. Algorithm Design. Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. S. Kumar, S. Roy, P. P. Chakrabarti, B. B. Bhattacharya, and K. Chakrabarty. 2013. Efficient mixture preparation on digital microfluidic biochips. In Proceedings of the IEEE 16th International Symposium on Design and Diagnostics of Electronic Circuits & Systems. 205--210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. K. Lee, C. Kim, B. Ahn, R. Panchapakesan, A. R. Full, L. Nordee, J. Y. Kang, and K. W. Oh. 2009. Generalized serial dilution module for monotonic and arbitrary microfluidic gradient generators. Lab-on-a-Chip 9, 709--717.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. C. C.-Y. Lin and Y.-W. Chang. 2011. Cross-contamination aware design methodology for pin-constrained digital microfluidic biochips. IEEE Trans. CAD 30, 6, 817--828. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. C.-H. Liu, H.-H. Chang, T.-C. Liang, and J.-D. Huang. 2013. Sample preparation for many-reactant bioassay on dmfbs using common dilution operation sharing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design. 615--621. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. V. N. Luk and A. R. Wheeler. 2009. A Digital Microfluidic Approach to Proteomic Sample Processing. Analytica Chimica Acta 81, 11, 4524--4530.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Y. Luo, K. Chakrabarty, and T.-Y. Ho. 2013. Error recovery in cyberphysical digital microfluidic biochips. IEEE Trans. CAD 32, 1, 59--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Y. Luo, T.-Y. Ho, and K. Chakrabarty. 2012. Dictionary-based error recovery in cyberphysical digital-microfluidic biochips. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design. 369--376. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. E. Maftei, P. Pop, and J. Madsen. 2012. Routing-based synthesis of digital microfluidic biochips. Des. Automation Embed. Syst. 16, 1, 19--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. E.M. Miller and A. R.Wheeler. 2009. Digital bioanalysis. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 393, 2, 419--426.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. D. Mitra, S. Roy, K. Chakrabarty, and B. B. Bhattacharya. 2012. On-chip sample preparation with multiple dilutions using digital microfluidics. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on VLSI. 314--319. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. H. Ren, V. Srinivasan, and R. B. Fair. 2003. Design and testing of an interpolating mixing architecture for electrowetting-based droplet-on-chip chemical dilution. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems. 619--622.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. S. Roy, B. B. Bhattacharya, P. P. Chakrabarti, and K. Chakrabarty. 2011b. Layout-aware solution preparation for biochemical analysis on a digital microfluidic biochip. In Proceedings of the International Conference on VLSI Design. 171--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. S. Roy, B. B. Bhattacharya, and K. Chakrabarty. 2010. Optimization of dilution and mixing of biochemical samples using digital microfluidic biochips. IEEE Trans. CAD 29, 11, 1696--1708. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. S. Roy, B. B. Bhattacharya, and K. Chakrabarty. 2011a. Waste-aware dilution and mixing of biochemical samples with digital microfluidic biochips. In Proceedings of the Conference and Exhibition on Design, Automation and Test in Europe. 1059--1064.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. S. Roy, B. B. Bhattacharya, S. Ghoshal, and K. Chakrabarty. 2013a. High-throughput dilution engine for sample preparation on digital microfluidic biochips. IET Comput. Digital Tech.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. S. Roy, B. B. Bhattacharya, S. Ghoshal, and K. Chakrabarty. 2013b. On-chip dilution from multiple concentrations of a sample fluid using digital microfluidics. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on VLSI Design and Test. 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. S. Roy, P. P. Chakrabarti, S. Kumar, B. B. Bhattacharya, and K. Chakrabarty. 2013c. Routing-aware resource allocation for mixture preparation in digital microfluidic biochips. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on VLSI. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. R. Sista, Z. Hua, P. Thwar, A. Sudarsan, V. Srinivasan, A. E. Eckhardt, M. G. Pollack, and V. K. Pamula. 2008. Development of a digital microfluidic platform for point of care testing. Lab-on-a-Chip 8, 12, 2091--2104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. S. Sugiura, K. Hattori, and T. Kanamori. 2010. Microfluidic serial dilution cell-based assay for analyzing drug dose response over a wide concentration range. Anal. Chem. 82, 19, 8278--8282.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. J. Talsma. 2013. Drug Shortages Still at Crisis Levels. http://drugtopics.modernmedicine.com/drug-topics/news/drug-shortages-still-crisis-levels?page=full.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. H. Y. Tan, W. K. Loke, Y. T. Tan, and N.-T. Nguyen. 2008. A lab-on-a-chip for detection of nerve agent sarin in blood. Lab-on-a-Chip 8, 6, 885--891.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. W. Thies, J. P. Urbanski, T. Thorsen, and S. Amarasinghe. 2008. Abstraction layers for scalable microfluidic biocomputing. Natural Computing 7, 2, 255--275. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. C. L. Ventola. 2011. The drug shortage crisis in the United States: Causes, impact, and management strategies. Pharm. Therapeutics 36, 11, 740--742, 749--757.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. H. A. Yusuf, S. J. Baldock, P. R. Fielden, N. J. Goddard, S. Mohr, and B. J. T. Brown. 2009. Systematic linearisation of a microfluidic gradient network with unequal solution inlet viscosities demonstrated using glycerol. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 8, 5, 587--598.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Theory and analysis of generalized mixing and dilution of biochemical fluids using digital microfluidic biochips

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            • Published in

              cover image ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems
              ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems  Volume 11, Issue 1
              September 2014
              142 pages
              ISSN:1550-4832
              EISSN:1550-4840
              DOI:10.1145/2676581
              Issue’s Table of Contents

              Copyright © 2014 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 6 October 2014
              • Accepted: 1 April 2014
              • Revised: 1 March 2014
              • Received: 1 November 2013
              Published in jetc Volume 11, Issue 1

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader