skip to main content
10.1145/2639968.2640061acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessocialcomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

To Blog or Not to Blog: Characterizing and Predicting Retention in Community Blogs

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 August 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Community blogging is a medium for publishing daily journals, expressing opinions or ideas, and sharing knowledge. Blogging has a high impact on marketing, shaping public opinions, and informing the world about major events from a grassroots point of view. However, turnover in online blogging is very high, with most people who initially join and start contributing to the community, failing to contribute in the long run.

In this paper, we ask what factors cause a blogger to continue participating in the community by contributing content (e.g., posts, comments). We crawled a sample of blogger profiles from a popular community blogging platform "Blogster". These bloggers contributed about 91% posts in the community. We derived a set of well-grounded variables related to blogger retention and built a predictive model from the variables. Our results show that the male and aged (senior) bloggers, who face fewer constraints and have more opportunities in the community are more retained than others. Other bloggers pay a high degree of attention to these retained bloggers through implicit (reading posts) and explicit (writing comments) interactions.

We have also found that a blogger has higher retention if her friends have also higher retention and a strong social tie reduces retention imbalance between two blogger friends. However, we found that a blogger's network age (e.g., how long ago she joined) has no effect on her retention. Our work has theoretical implications for the social behavior literature of bloggers, and practical implications for potential community blogging platform developers.

References

  1. R. Burt. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. N. Cummings, B. Butler, and R. Kraut. The quality of online social relationships. Commun. ACM, 45(7):103--108, July 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Diani and D. McAdam. Social movements and networks: Relational approaches to collective action: Relational approaches to collective action. Oxford University Press, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. E. Estrada and J. A. Rodriguez-Velazquez. Subgraph centrality in complex networks. Physical Review E 71, 056103, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. D. Gillmor. We the Media: Grassroots Journalism by the People, for the People. O'Reilly, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Gjoka, M. Kurant, C. T. Butts, and A. Markopoulou. Practical recommendations on crawling online social networks. Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Journal on, 29(9):1872--1892, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. R. Hanneman and M. Riddle. Introduction to social network methods. 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. C. Herring. 9 gender and power in on-line communication. The handbook of language and gender, 25:202, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Java, X. Song, T. Finin, and B. Tseng. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis, pages 56--65. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Q. Jones, G. Ravid, and S. Rafaeli. Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Information systems research, 15(2):194--210, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. E. Joyce and R. E. Kraut. Predicting continued participation in newsgroups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3):723--747, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. P. Kollock and M. Smith. Managing the virtual commons. Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives, pages 109--128, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Lawrence. Five customer retention tips for entrepreneurs. http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexlawrence/2012/11/01/five-customer-retention-tips-for-entrepreneurs/, November 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. T. Lento, H. T. Welser, L. Gu, and M. Smith. The ties that blog: Examining the relationship between social ties and continued participation in the wallop weblogging system. In 3rd Annual Workshop on the Weblogging Ecosystem, volume 12. Citeseer, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. D. McAdam. Freedom summer. Oxford University Press, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. M. McPherson, L. Smith-Lovin, and J. M. Cook. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual review of sociology, pages 415--444, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. B. A. Nardi, D. J. Schiano, M. Gumbrecht, and L. Swartz. Why we blog. Communications of the ACM, 47(12):41--46, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. E. J. Newman. Networks: An Introduction. Oxford University Press, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J.-P. Onnela, J. Saramäki, J. Hyvönen, G. Szabó, D. Lazer, K. Kaski, J. Kertész, and A.-L. Barabási. Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(18):7332--7336, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The pagerank citation ranking: bringing order to the web. Stanford InfoLab, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. L. Rao. Wordpress now powers 22 percent of new active websites in the u.s. http://techcrunch.com/2011/08/19/wordpress-now-powers-22-percent-of-new-active-websites-in-the-us/ August 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. M. Stiggelbout, M. Hopman-Rock, M. Crone, L. Lechner, and W. Van Mechelen. Predicting older adults' maintenance in exercise participation using an integrated social psychological model. Health Education Research, 21(1):1--14, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. M. Tortoriello and D. Krackhardt. Activating cross-boundary knowledge: the role of simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1):167--181, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. B. Wellman. An electronic group is virtually a social network. Culture of the Internet, 4:179--205, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. To Blog or Not to Blog: Characterizing and Predicting Retention in Community Blogs

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        SocialCom '14: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Social Computing
        August 2014
        115 pages
        ISBN:9781450328883
        DOI:10.1145/2639968

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 August 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader