skip to main content
10.1145/2645710.2645730acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Gradient boosting factorization machines

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recommendation techniques have been well developed in the past decades. Most of them build models only based on user item rating matrix. However, in real world, there is plenty of auxiliary information available in recommendation systems. We can utilize these information as additional features to improve recommendation performance. We refer to recommendation with auxiliary information as context-aware recommendation. Context-aware Factorization Machines (FM) is one of the most successful context-aware recommendation models. FM models pairwise interactions between all features, in such way, a certain feature latent vector is shared to compute the factorized parameters it involved. In practice, there are tens of context features and not all the pairwise feature interactions are useful. Thus, one important challenge for context-aware recommendation is how to effectively select "good" interaction features. In this paper, we focus on solving this problem and propose a greedy interaction feature selection algorithm based on gradient boosting. Then we propose a novel Gradient Boosting Factorization Machine (GBFM) model to incorporate feature selection algorithm with Factorization Machines into a unified framework. The experimental results on both synthetic and real datasets demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of our algorithm compared to other state-of-the-art methods.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p265-sidebyside.mp4

mp4

39.9 MB

References

  1. G. Adomavicius, R. Sankaranarayanan, S. Sen, and A. Tuzhilin. Incorporating contextual information in recommender systems using a multidimensional approach. pages 103--145, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. Agarwal and B.-C. Chen. Regression-based latent factor models. In KDD, pages 19--28, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. L. Baltrunas, B. Ludwig, and F. Ricci. Matrix factorization techniques for context aware recommendation. In RecSys, pages 301--304, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R. M. Bell and Y. Koren. Lessons from the netix prize challenge. SIGKDD Explorations, 9(2):75--79, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C. J. Burges. From ranknet to lambdarank to lambdamart: An overview. Learning, 11:23--581, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. T. Chen, H. Li, Q. Yang, and Y. Yu. General functional matrix factorization using gradient boosting. In Proceedings of The 30th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 436--444, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. T. Chen, L. Tang, Q. Liu, D. Yang, S. Xie, X. Cao, C. Wu, E. Yao, Z. Liu, Z. Jiang, et al. Combining factorization model and additive forest for collaborative followee recommendation. KDD CUP, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. C. Cheng, H. Yang, I. King, and M. R. Lyu. Fused matrix factorization with geographical and social influence in location-based social networks. In AAAI, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Cheng, H. Yang, M. R. Lyu, and I. King. Where you like to go next: Successive point-of-interest recommendation. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Third international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 2605--2611. AAAI Press, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Friedman, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. Special invited paper. additive logistic regression: A statistical view of boosting. Annals of statistics, pages 337--374, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. H. Friedman. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, pages 1189--1232, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, J. Friedman, T. Hastie, J. Friedman, and R. Tibshirani. The elements of statistical learning, volume 2. Springer, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. M. Jamali and M. Ester. A matrix factorization technique with trust propagation for recommendation in social networks. In RecSys, pages 135--142, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. Karatzoglou, X. Amatriain, L. Baltrunas, and N. Oliver. Multiverse recommendation: n-dimensional tensor factorization for context-aware collaborative filtering. In RecSys, pages 79--86, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. T. G. Kolda and B. W. Bader. Tensor decompositions and applications. SIAM review, 51(3):455--500, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Y. Koren. Factorization meets the neighborhood: a multifaceted collaborative filtering model. In KDD, pages 426--434, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Y. Koren. Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics. In KDD, pages 447--456, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. N. D. Lawrence and R. Urtasun. Non-linear matrix factorization with gaussian processes. In ICML, page 76, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. X. Liu and K. Aberer. Soco: a social network aided context-aware recommender system. In WWW, pages 781--802, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. H. Ma, I. King, and M. R. Lyu. Learning to recommend with explicit and implicit social relations. ACM TIST, 2(3):29, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. U. Panniello, A. Tuzhilin, M. Gorgoglione, C. Palmisano, and A. Pedone. Experimental comparison of pre- vs. post-filtering approaches in context-aware recommender systems. In RecSys, pages 265--268, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. S. Rendle. Factorization machines. In ICDM, pages 995--1000, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. S. Rendle. Social network and click-through prediction with factorization machines. In KDD-Cup Workshop, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. S. Rendle. Scaling factorization machines to relational data. PVLDB, 6(5):337--348, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. S. Rendle, Z. Gantner, C. Freudenthaler, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Fast context-aware recommendations with factorization machines. In SIGIR, pages 635--644, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. S. Rendle and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Pairwise interaction tensor factorization for personalized tag recommendation. In WSDM, pages 81--90, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. R. Salakhutdinov and A. Mnih. Probabilistic matrix factorization. In NIPS, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. B. M. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In WWW, pages 285--295, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. N. Srebro, J. D. M. Rennie, and T. Jaakkola. Maximum-margin matrix factorization. In NIPS, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. D. H. Stern, R. Herbrich, and T. Graepel. Matchbox: large scale online bayesian recommendations. In WWW, pages 111--120, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. L. R. Tucker. Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika, 31(3):279--311, 1966.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. J. Weston, C. Wang, R. J. Weiss, and A. Berenzweig. Latent collaborative retrieval. In ICML, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. L. Xiong, X. Chen, T.-K. Huang, J. G. Schneider, and J. G. Carbonell. Temporal collaborative filtering with bayesian probabilistic tensor factorization. In SDM, pages 211--222, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. J. Xu and H. Li. Adarank: a boosting algorithm for information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 391--398. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. M. Ye, P. Yin, W.-C. Lee, and D. L. Lee. Exploiting geographical inuence for collaborative point-of-interest recommendation. In SIGIR, pages 325--334, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. E. Zhong, W. Fan, and Q. Y. 0001. Contextual collaborative filtering via hierarchical matrix factorization. In SDM, pages 744--755, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Gradient boosting factorization machines

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          RecSys '14: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender systems
          October 2014
          458 pages
          ISBN:9781450326681
          DOI:10.1145/2645710

          Copyright © 2014 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 October 2014

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          RecSys '14 Paper Acceptance Rate35of234submissions,15%Overall Acceptance Rate254of1,295submissions,20%

          Upcoming Conference

          RecSys '24
          18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
          October 14 - 18, 2024
          Bari , Italy

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader