ABSTRACT
This paper explores a gap within the serious game design research. That gap is the ambiguity surrounding the process of aligning the instructional objectives of serious games with their core-gameplay i.e. the moment-to-moment activity that is the core of player interaction. A core-gameplay focused design framework is proposed that can work alongside existing, more broadly focused serious games design frameworks. The framework utilises an inquiry-based approach that allows the serious game designer to use key questions as a means to clearly outline instructional objectives with the core-gameplay. The use of this design framework is considered in the context of a small section of gameplay from an educational game currently in development. This demonstration of the framework brings shows how instructional objectives can be embedded into a serious games core-gameplay.
Supplemental Material
- Adams, E. Fundamentals of Game Design. New Riders, Berkeley, CA, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Amory, A. Game object model version II: A Theoretical Framework for Educational Game Development. Educational Technology Research and Development 55, 1 (2006), 51--77.Google Scholar
- Arnab, S., Lim, T., Carvalho, M.B., et al. Mapping Learning and Game Mechanics for Serious Games Analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, (2014).Google Scholar
- Ausubel, D.P. Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, NY, USA, 1968.Google Scholar
- Bruckman, A. Can Educational be Fun. Proc. Game Developers Conference 1999, (1999).Google Scholar
- Chamberlin, B., Trespalacios, J., and Gallagher, R. The Learning Games Design Model. International Journal of Game-Based Learning 2, 3 (2012), 87--110.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Connolly, T., Stansfield, M., and Hainey, T. Development of a General Framework for Evaluating Games-Based Learning. Proc. 2nd European Conference on Games Based Learning, Academic Conferences Limited (2008), 105--114.Google Scholar
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper and Row, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
- Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. The -- What -- and -- Why -- of Goal Pursuits?: Human Needs and the SelfDetermination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry 11, 4 (2000), 227--268.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Djaouti, D., Alvarez, J., and Jessel, J. Classifying Serious Games?: the G / P / S model. In Handbook of Research on Improving Learning and Motivation through Educational Games: Multidisciplinary Approaches. 2011, 118--136.Google Scholar
- Dondi, C. and Moretti, M. A methodological proposal for learning games selection and quality assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology 38, 3 (2007), 502--512.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dondlinger, M.J. Educational Video Game Design?: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Applied Educational Technology 4, 1 (2007), 21--31.Google Scholar
- Gosper, M. and Mcneill, M. Implementing Game-Based Learning: The MAPLET Framework as a Guide to Learner-Centred Design and Assessment. In Assessment in Game-Based Learning. Springer New York, New York, 2012, 217--233.Google Scholar
- Habgood, J. and Ainsworth, S. Motivating Children to Learn Effectively: Exploring the Value of Intrinsic Integration in Educational Games. Journal of the Learning Sciences 20, 2 (2011), 169--206.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hays, R.T. The Effectiveness Of Instructional Games?: A Literature Review And Discussion. Orlando, FL, 2005.Google Scholar
- Krathwohl, D.R. A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice 41, 4 (2002), 212--218.Google Scholar
- Lundgren, S. and Björk, S. Game Mechanics?: Describing Computer-Augmented Games in Terms of Interaction. Proc. Technologies for Interactive Digital Storytelling and Entertainment (TIDSE), (2003).Google Scholar
- Mager, R. Preparing Instructional Objectives: A critical tool in the development of effective instruction. Center for Effective Performance, 1997.Google Scholar
- Martin, M.W. Serious Game Design Principles?: The Impact Of Game Design On Learning Outcomes. 2012, 163.Google Scholar
- Marzano, R.J. Designing & teaching learning goals & objectives. Marzano Research Laboratory, Bloomington, IN, 2009.Google Scholar
- Norman, D. The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. Basic Books, 2013.Google Scholar
- Novak, J.D. and Canas, A.J. The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. 2008. http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/Theor yUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf.Google Scholar
- Przybylski, A.K., Rigby, C.S., and Ryan, R.M. A motivational model of video game engagement. Review of General Psychology 14, 2 (2010), 154--166.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Salen, K. and Zimmerman, E. Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shelton, B.E. and Scoresby, J. Aligning game activity with educational goals: following a constrained design approach to instructional computer games. Educational Technology Research and Development 59, 1 (2011), 113--138.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sherry, J. and Pacheco, A. Matching Computer Game Genres To Educational Outcomes. Electronic Journal of Communication 16, (2006), 10--14.Google Scholar
- Sicart, M. Defining Game Mechanics. Game Studies, 2008. http://gamestudies.org/0802/articles/sicart.Google Scholar
- Sweetser, P. and Wyeth, P. GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. Comput. Entertain. 3, 3 (2005). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sweller, J. Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review 22, 2 (2010), 123--138.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tang, S. and Hanneghan, M. Designing Educational Games?: A Pedagogical Approach. In Design and Implementation of Educational Games: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 2010, 108--125.Google Scholar
- Watson, W.R. Formative Research on an Instructional Design Theory for Educational Video Games. 2007, 203.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Instructional objectives to core-gameplay: a serious game design technique
Recommendations
Exploring aesthetical gameplay design patterns: camaraderie in four games
MindTrek '10: Proceedings of the 14th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media EnvironmentsThis paper explores how a vocabulary supporting design-related discussions of gameplay preferences can be developed. Using the preference of experiencing camaraderie as an example, we have analyzed four games: the board games Space Alert and Battlestar ...
The Gameplay Loop: a Player Activity Model for Game Design and Analysis
ACE '16: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment TechnologyTo describe the task of the game designer, the literature on the subject often refers to rules and systems. But the main objective of the game designer's work is to create a specific kind of experience: gameplay. Based in both literature and diverse ...
Asynchronous gameplay in pervasive multiplayer mobile games
CHI EA '09: CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsOne of the interesting features in pervasive multiplayer games is that gaming can be blended into other daily activities. However, the players' current context creates challenges for this parallel activity and therefore, the game design should enable ...
Comments