skip to main content
10.1145/2668883.2668887acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswhConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Efficacy of a Smartphone System to Support Groups in Behavior Change Programs

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Smartphone platforms provide an excellent opportunity for projecting existing or new behavior-change methods into everyday life at great economies of scale. In this paper we present an experimental test of a new behavior-change smartphone platform and application called Fittle, which delivers ecological momentary interventions and group support to help people progressively master healthy habits. An 8-week field study involving 19 participants demonstrated the engagement and efficacy of Fittle across three classes of behavior (diet, physical activity, and stress-reduction). Individual adherence to the behavior programs was found to be associated with group membership. Content analysis of intragroup interactions suggests that high performance groups were generally more social, more supporting of each other on program goals, and shared more.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. The Theory of Planned Behavior. In Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 2 (1991), 179--211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Armitage, C. J. and Conner, M. Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Psychology 40, 4 (2001), 471--449.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist 44, 9 (1989), 1175--1184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman, New York, NY, USA, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumer, E.P., Katz, S.J, Freeman, J.E., Adams, P., Gonzales, A.L., Pollak, J., Retelny, D., Niederdeppe, J., Olson, C.M. and Gay, G.K. Prescriptive persuasion and open-ended social awareness: expanding the design space of mobile health. In Proc. of CSCW'12, (2012), 475--484. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Brewer, N. T. and Rimer, B.K. Perspectives on Health Behavior Theories That Focus on Individuals. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice 4th Edition. Jossey-Bass, 2008, 149--166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooke, J. SUS: A "quick and dirty" usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, London: Taylor and Francis, (1996), 189--194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, B., Chetty, M., Grimes, A., and Harmon, E. Reflecting on Health: A system for students to monitor diet and exercise. Proc CHI EA, (2006), 1807--1812. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Bridle, C., Riemsma, R.P., Pattenden, J., Sowden, A.J., Mather, L., Watt, I.S., and Walker A. Systematic review of the effectiveness of health behavior interventions based on the Transtheoretical Model. Psychology and Health 20, (2005), 283--301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Callaghan, P. and Morrissey J. Social support and health: a review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 18, 2, (1993), 203--210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Carron, A.V., Eys, M.A., Burke, S.M., Jowett, S., and Lavallee, D. Team cohesion: nature, correlates, and development. Social psychology and sport, Human Kinetics Publishers (2006), 91--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T. and Mermelstein, R. A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 24, (1983), 385--396.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Cole-Lewis, H. and Kershaw, T. Text Messaging as a Tool for Behavior Change in Disease Prevention and Management. Epidemiologic Revs 32, 1,(2010), 56--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Consolvo, S., Klasnja, P., McDonald, D.W., & Landay, J.A. Goal-setting considerations for persuasive technologies that encourage physical activity. In Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, ACM Press (2009), 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Cooper, Z., Fairburn, C.G., Wadden, T.A., and Stunkard, A.J. Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Obesity. Guilford Press, New York, NY, USA, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Edwards, L.J., Muller, K.E., Wolfinger, R.D., Qaqish, B.F., and Schabenberger, O. An R2 statistic for fixed effects in the linear mixed model. Statistics in Medicine 27, 29, (2008), 6137--6157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Fogg, B.J. The Behavior Grid: 35 ways behavior can change. In Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, ACM Press, (2009), 42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Fogg, B.J. and Hreha, J. Behavior Wizard: A Method for Matching Target Behaviors with Solutions. Persuasive Technology, Springer, (2010), 117--131. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Fry, J.P. and Neff, R. Periodic Prompts and Reminders in Health Promotion and Health Behavior Interventions: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 11, 2 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Gollwitzer, P.M., and Sheeran, P. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 42, (2006), 668--675.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Grimes, A., Bednar, M., Bolter, J.D., and Grinter, R.E. EatWell: sharing nutrition-related memories in a low-income community. Proc CSCW, (2008), 87--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Hanauer, D. a, Wentzell, K., Laffel, N., and Laffel, L.M. Computerized Automated Reminder Diabetes System (CARDS). Diabetes tech & therapeutics, 11, 2 (2009), 99--106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Harrison, J.A., Mullen, P.D., and Green, L.W. A meta-analysis of studies of the Health Belief Model. Health Education Research 7, (1992), 107--116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Heron, K.E. and Smyth, J.M. Ecological momentary interventions: incorporating mobile technology into psychosocial and health behaviour treatments. British journal of health psychology 15, 1, (2010), 1--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Hull, C. L. Principles of Behavior. Appleton Century Crofts Inc, New York, NY, USA, 1943.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. IPAQ. International Physical Activity Questionnaire. http://www.ipaq.ki.se/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Kazantzis, N. and L'Abate, L. Handbook of homework assignments in Psychotherapy: Research, practice, and prevention. Springer, NY, USA, 2007, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. King, A.C., Ahn, D.K., Oliveira, B.M., Atienza, A. a, Castro, C.M., and Gardner, C.D. Promoting physical activity through hand-held computer technology. Amer J of Prev Med, 34, 2 (2008), 138--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Lin, J.J., Mamykina, L., Lindtner, S., Delajoux, G., and Strub, H.B. Fish'n'Steps: Encouraging Physical Activity with an Interactive Computer Game. Proc UbiComp, (2006), 261--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Locke, E. A. and Latham, G.P. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist 57, 9, (2002), 705--717.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Miller, W.R. and Rollnick, S. Motivational interviewing: Helping people change, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Patrick, K., et al. A text message-based intervention for weight loss: randomized controlled trial. Journal of medical Internet research 11, 1 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Pollak, J.P., Adams, P., Gay, G., and Ave, C. PAM: A Photographic Affect Meter for Frequent, In Situ Measurement of Affect. In Proc. of CHI, (2011), 725--734. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Presetwich, A., and Kellar, I. How can the impact of implementation intentions as a behavior change intervention be improved? Rev. Eur. Psychol. Appl., Elsevier, (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Prestwich, A., Perugini, M., and Hurling, R. Can implementation intentions and text messages promote brisk walking? A randomized trial. Health Psychology 29, 1, (2010), 40--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Pagoto S. Evidence-based strategies in weight-loss mobile apps. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Nov;45(5):576--82Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Richardson, C.R., Buis, L.R., Janney, A.W., Goodrich, D.E., Sen, A., Hess, M.L., Mehari, K.S., et al. An online community improves adherence in an Internet-mediated walking program. Part 1: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of medical Internet research 12, 4, (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Sallis, J.F. and Glanz, K. Physical activity and food environments: solutions to the obesity epidemic. The Milbank quarterly 87, 1, (2009), 123--154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Schlundt, D.G., Hargreaves, M.K., and Buchowski, M.S. The Eating Behavior Patterns Questionnaire predicts dietary fat intake in African American women. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 103, 3, (2003), 338--345.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Snijders, Tom A.B., and Bosker, R.J. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. Sage Publishers, London, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Stoddard, L.J., Augustson, E.M., and Moser, R.P. Effect of Adding a Virtual Community (Bulletin Board) to Smokefree.gov: Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of medical Internet research 10, 5, (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Thorpe, K.E. The future costs of obesity: National and state estimates of the impact on direct health care expenses. (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Wansink, B. and Sobal, J. Mindless Eating: The 200 Daily Food Decisions We Overlook. Environment and Behavior 39, 1, (2007), 106--123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Webb, T.L., et al. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. Journal of medical Internet research 12, 1, (2010), 1438--8871.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Wing, R.R., and Phelan, S. Long-term weight loss maintenance. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 82, 1, (2005), 2225--2255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Efficacy of a Smartphone System to Support Groups in Behavior Change Programs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WH '14: Proceedings of the Wireless Health 2014 on National Institutes of Health
      October 2014
      97 pages
      ISBN:9781450331609
      DOI:10.1145/2668883

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 October 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • tutorial
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate35of139submissions,25%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader