skip to main content
10.1145/2675133.2675158acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Accessible Crowdwork?: Understanding the Value in and Challenge of Microtask Employment for People with Disabilities

Published:28 February 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present the first formal study of crowdworkers who have disabilities via in-depth open-ended interviews of 17 people (disabled crowdworkers and job coaches for people with disabilities) and a survey of 631 adults with disabilities. Our findings establish that people with a variety of disabilities currently participate in the crowd labor marketplace, despite challenges such as crowdsourcing workflow designs that inadvertently prohibit participation by, and may negatively affect the worker reputations of, people with disabilities. Despite such challenges, we find that crowdwork potentially offers different opportunities for people with disabilities relative to the normative office environment, such as job flexibility and lack of a need to rely on public transit. We close by identifying several ways in which crowd labor platform operators and/or individual task requestors could improve the accessibility of this increasingly important form of employment.

References

  1. Abberley, P. (1999). The significance of work for the citizenship of disabled people. University College Dublin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, S. M. M., & Carlson, G. M. (2003). To conceal or disclose a disabling condition? A dilemma of employment transition. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 10, 19--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bigham, J.P., Jayant, C., Ji, H., Little, G., Miller, A., Miller, R.C., Miller, R., Tatarowicz, A., White, B., White, S., and Yeh, T. VizWiz: Nearly Real-Time Answers to Visual Questions. Proceedings of UIST 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bigham, J.P. and Cavender, A.C. Evaluating Existing Audio CAPTCHAs and an Interface Optimized for Non-Visual Use. Proceedings of CHI 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Brady, E. L., Zhong, Y., Morris, M. R., & Bigham, J. P. Investigating the appropriateness of social network question asking as a resource for blind users. Proceedings of CSCW 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Breckenridge, C. A., & Vogler, C. A. (2001). The critical limits of embodiment: reflections on disability criticism. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruyere, S.M. and Barringtron, L. (2012) "Employment and Work." In Disability: Key Issues and Future Directions (G.L. Albrecht, ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Burton, M. A., Brady, E., Brewer, R., Neylan, C., Bigham, J. P., & Hurst, A. Crowdsourcing subjective fashion advice using VizWiz: challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of ASSETS 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Devlin, R. F., & Pothier, D. (2006). Critical disability theory essays in philosophy, politics, policy, and law. Vancouver, B.C.: UBC Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Diament, M. (2014, March 25). Feds Move Forward with Disability Hiring Mandate - Disability Scoop. Retrieved from http://www.disabilityscoop.com/2014/03/25/feds-disability-hiring-mandate/19222/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Folbre, N. The Unregulated Work of Mechanical Turk. (2013). Economix Blog, New York Times.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2003). Digital disability: the social construction of disability in new media. Lanham {Md.}: Rowman & Littlefield. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hara, K., Azenkot, S., Campbell, M., Bennett, C., Le, V., Panella, S., Moore, R., Minckler, K.,Ng, R., and Froehlich, J. Improving Public Transit Accessibility for Blind Riders by Crowdsourcing Bus Stop Landmark Locations with Google Street View. Proceedings of ASSETS 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hara, K., Le, V., and Froehlich, J. Combining Crowdsourcing and Google Street View to Identify Street-level Accessibility Problems. Proceedings of CHI 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hong, H., Yarosh, S., Kim, J.G., Abowd, G.D., and Arriaga, R.I. Investigating the Use of Circles in Social Networks to Support Independence of Individuals with Autism. Proceedings of CHI 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Demographics of Mechanical Turk (Working Paper). New York, NY, USA. Retrieved from http://archive.nyu.edu/handle/2451/29585Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ipeirotis, P.G. Analyzing the Amazon Mechanical Turk Marketplace. ACM XRDS, Winter 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kittur, A., Nickerson, J.V., Bernstein, M.S., Gerber, E.M., Shaw, A., Zimmerman, J., Lease, M., and Horton, J.J. The Future of Crowd Work. Proceedings of CSCW 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kruse, D., Schur, L., & Ali, M. (2010, March 2). Projecting Potential Demand for Workers with Disabilities. Monthly Labor Review.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lasecki, W.S., Miller, C.D., Sadilek, A., Abumoussa, A., Borrello, D., Kushalnagar, R., and Bigham, J.P. Real-Time Captioning by Groups of Non-Experts. Proceedings of UIST 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Mankoff, J., Hayes, G. R., & Kasnitz, D. Disability Studies as a Source of Critical Inquiry for the Field of Assistive Technology. Proceedings of ASSETS 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Martin, D., Hanrahan, B. V., O'Neill, J., & Gupta, N. Being A Turker. Proceedings of CSCW 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Marvit, M. Z. (2014, February 4). How Crowdworkers Became the Ghosts in the Digital Machine. The Nation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. McDermott, R., & Varenne, H. (1995). Culture as Disability. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 26(3), 324--348.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Notte, J. (2013, June 21). Goodwill pays disabled workers pennies an hour. Msn.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ross, J., Irani, L., Silberman, M. S., Zaldivar, A., & Tomlinson, B. Who Are the Crowdworkers?: Shifting Demographics in Mechanical Turk. Extended Abstracts of CHI 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Rush, C. L. (2012). Amending the Americans with Disabilities Act Shifting Equal Employment Opportunity Obligations in Public Human Resource Management. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(1), 75--86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Rzeszotarski, J. M., Chi, E., Paritosh, P., & Dai, P.. Inserting Micro-Breaks into Crowdsourcing Workflows. Proceedings of HCOMP 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Suzanne, L (2014). Some companies see opportunity in autism. CBS News. Retrieved May 10, 2014, from http://www.cbsnews.com/news/some-companies-see-opportunity-in-autism/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Teodoro, R., Ozturk, P., Naaman, M., Mason, W., & Lindqvist, J.. The Motivations and Experiences of the On-demand Mobile Workforce. Proceedings of CSCW 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. von Ahn, L. and Dabbish, L. Labeling images with a computer game. Proceedings of CHI 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Weiss, R. S. (1995). Learning from strangers: the art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Accessible Crowdwork?: Understanding the Value in and Challenge of Microtask Employment for People with Disabilities

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
      February 2015
      1956 pages
      ISBN:9781450329224
      DOI:10.1145/2675133

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 February 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '15 Paper Acceptance Rate161of575submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader