skip to main content
10.1145/2675133.2675236acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Computer Support for Financial Advisors and Their Clients: Co-creating an Investment Plan

Published:28 February 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper is a workplace study of how financial advisors use their computer systems in advisory meetings with clients, with special focus on the collaborative decision-making. Observations and interviews show that the financial advisors in the study were not much helped by their computer system in visualizing and explaining financial concepts to their clients, and that not all of them trusted the system's decision support feature. Furthermore, client meetings can involve more than one client, which has further implications for the design of financial decision support.

References

  1. Almenberg, J., and Säve-Söderbergh, J. Financial Literacy and Retirement Planning in Sweden. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 10, 4 (2011), 585.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Alsos, O. and Svanæs, D. Designing for the Secondary User Experience. In Proc. Interact 2011, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2011), 84--91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bateman, H., Eckert, C., Geweke, J., Louviere, J. J., Satchell, S. E., and Thorp, S. Investment Risk Framing and Individual Preference Consistency. UNSW Australian School of Business Research Paper, (2011).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bjørn, P., and Balka, E. Health Care Categories Have Politics Too: Unpacking the Managerial Agendas of Electronic Triage Systems. In Proc.10th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Springer London (2007), 371--390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Callan, V. J. and Johnson, M. Some Guidelines for Financial Planners in Measuring and Advising Clients about Their Levels of Risk Tolerance. Journal of Personal Finance 1, 1 (2002), 31--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cronqvist, H. and Thaler, R. Design Choices in Privatized Social-Security Systems: Learning from the Swedish Experience. American Economic Review, (2004), 424--428.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Eriksson, K., and Söderberg, I.L. Customers' Ways of Making Sense of a Financial Service Relationship through Intersubjective Mirroring of Others. Journal of Financial Services Marketing 15, 2 (2010), 99--111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Eriksson, K., Persson, A. and Söderberg, I.L. Bankrådgivningsrelationen och rådgivningslagen (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Financial Advice to Consumers Act (SFS, 2003:862). http://www.government.se/sb/d/2016/a/31099Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Glover, S., Prawitt, D. and Spilker, B. The Influence of Decision Aids on User Behavior: Implications for Knowledge Acquisition and Inappropriate Reliance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 72, 2 (1997), 232--255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Guillemette, M. A., Finke, M. S., and Gilliam, J. Which Types of Risk Tolerance Questions Should Be Used When Determining a Client's Portfolio Allocation Preference?, (2012). Available at SSRN 2009419.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Haisley, E., Kaufmann, C. and Weber, M. How Much Risk Can I Handle?: The Role of Experience Sampling and Graphical Displays on One's Investment Risk Appetite and Comprehension. Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Finanzwirtschaft, insbesondere Bankbetriebslehre, Universität Mannheim (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Heinrich, P., Kilic, M., Aschoff, F. and Schwabe, G. Enabling Relationship Building in Tabletop-Supported Advisory Settings. In Proc. 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM Press (2014), 171--183. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Markets in Financial Services Directive. http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/securities/isd/index _en.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. McCrae, M. Profiling the Risk Attitudes of Clients by Financial Advisors: The Effects of Framing on Response Validity. Faculty of Commerce-Accounting & Finance Working Papers 36, (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mogacito, R., Schwabe, G., Nussbaumer, P., Stehli, E., and Eberhard, M. Beratungsqualität in Banken. Solution Providers AG (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Nussbaumer, P., and Matter, I. What You See Is What You (Can) Get Designing for Process Transparency in Financial Advisory Encounters. In Proc. Interact 2011, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2011), 277--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Nussbaumer, P., Matter, I. and Schwabe, G. "Enforced" vs. "Casual" Transparency-Findings from ITSupported Advisory Encounters. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems 3, 2 (2012), 11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Nussbaumer, P., Slembek, I., Lueag, C., Mogacito, R. and Schwabe, G. Understanding Information Seeking Behaviour in Financial Advisory. In ISI: Internationales Symposium für Informationswissenschaft, (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Oehler, A. and Kohlert, D. Financial Advice Giving and Taking--Where Are the Market's Self-Healing Powers and a Functioning Legal Framework When We Need Them? Journal of Consumer Policy 32, 2 (2009), 91--116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Rogers, Y. and Lindley, S. Collaborating around Vertical and Horizontal Large Interactive Displays: Which Way is Best? Interacting with Computers 16, 6 (2004), 1133--1152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Roszkowski, M. J. and Davey, G. Risk Perception and Risk Tolerance Changes Attributable to the 2008 Economic Crisis: A Subtle but Critical Difference. Journal of Financial Service Professionals 64, 4 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Schmidt, K. Of Maps and Scripts: The Status of Formal Constructs in Cooperative Work. Information and software technology 4, 6 (1999). 319--329.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Schmidt-Rauch, S., and Nussbaumer, P. Putting Value Co-Creation into Practice: A Case for Advisory Support. In Proc. ECIS: European Conference on Information Systems, (2011), 138.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Söderberg, I.L. Financial Advisory Services: Exploring Relationships Between Consumers and Financial Advisors. Ph.D. thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Söderberg, I.L., Sallis, J. and Eriksson, K. The Dark Side of Trust and the Light Side of Working Alliances in Financial Services. Journal of Consumer Research (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Suchman, L. Do Categories Have Politics? The Language/Action Perspective Reconsidered. In Proc. 3rd European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Springer Netherlands (1993), 1--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sundali, J. A., and Guerrero, F. Managing a 401 (k) Account: An Experiment on Asset Allocation. Journal of Behavioral Finance 10, 2 (2009), 108--124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Winograd, T. Categories, Disciplines, and Social Coordination. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2, 3 (1993). 191--197.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Computer Support for Financial Advisors and Their Clients: Co-creating an Investment Plan

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
      February 2015
      1956 pages
      ISBN:9781450329224
      DOI:10.1145/2675133

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 February 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '15 Paper Acceptance Rate161of575submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader