skip to main content
10.1145/2677199.2680561acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Tangible Interactive Microbiology for Informal Science Education

Published:15 January 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present an interactive platform that enables human users to interface with microbiological living cells through a touch-screen, thereby generating a tangible interactive experience with the microscopic world that is hidden to most people. Euglena gracilis, single-celled phototactic microorganisms, are imaged and optically stimulated via a microscope setup equipped with a projector and a touch-screen display. Users can directly interact with these organisms by drawing patterns onto the screen, which displays the real-time magnified view of the microfluidic chamber with the motile euglena cells. The drawings are directly projected onto the chamber, thereby influencing the swimming motion of the cells. We discuss the architecture of the system and provide exploratory user testing results in a facilitated setting, which shows engaging nature of our system for children and the general public. In conclusion, our tangible interactive microscope allows artistic expression and scientific exploration with the ease of a "child's play."

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

tei149.mp4

mp4

85.7 MB

References

  1. Alberts, B., Prioritizing Science Education. Science, 328, 5977 (2010), 405.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Azuma, R.T., A survey of augmented reality. Presence, 6, 4 (1997), 355--385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Banister, S., Integrating the iPod Touch in K'12 Education: Visions and Vices. Computers in the Schools, 27, 2 (2010), 121--131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Barsanti, L., V. Evangelista, V. Passarelli, A.M. Frassanito, and P. Gualtieri, Fundamental questions and concepts about photoreception and the case of Euglena gracilis. Integrative Biology, 4, 1 (2012), 22--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Blikstein, P., Gears of our childhood: constructionist toolkits, robotics, and physical computing, past and future, in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children.(2013), ACM: New York, New York.173--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Boisvert, D.L. and B.J. Slez, The relationship between exhibit characteristics and learning-associated behaviors in a science museum discovery space. Science Education, 79, 5 (1995), 503--518.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. de Souza e Silva, A. and G.C. Delacruz, Hybrid Reality Games Reframed: Potential Uses in Educational Contexts. Games and Culture, 1, 3 (2006), 231--251.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Deisseroth, K., Optogenetics. Nat Meth, 8, 1 (2011), 26--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Diehn, B., Phototaxis and Sensory Transduction in Euglena. Science, 181, 4104 (1973), 1009--1015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Duffy, D.C., J.C. McDonald, O.J.A. Schueller, and G.M. Whitesides, Rapid Prototyping of Microfluidic Systems in Poly(dimethylsiloxane). Analytical Chemistry, 70, 23 (1998), 4974--4984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Frederickson, R.M., Fluidigm. Biochips get indoor plumbing. Chemistry & biology, 9, 11 (2002), 1161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamidi, F. and M. Baljko, Rafigh: a living media interface for speech intervention, in Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems.(2014), ACM: Toronto, Ontario, Canada.1817--1820. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Harvey, H., Havard, M., Magnus, D., Cho, M., & Riedel-Kruse, I., Innocent fun or microslavery? : Public Responses to and Ethical Analysis of Biotic Games. Hasting Center Report, 44, 6 (2014), 38--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hertz, G., Cockroach controlled mobile robot. Garnet Hertz-Http://conceptlabcom, (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hilton, M. and M.A. Honey, Learning science through computer games and simulations. 2011: National Academies Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Horn, M., Z.A. Leong, F. Block, J. Diamond, E.M. Evans, B. Phillips, and C. Shen, Of BATs and APEs: an interactive tabletop game for natural history museums, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.(2012), ACM: Austin, Texas, USA.2059--2068. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Karsenty, T. and A. Fievez, The iPad in education: uses, benefits, and challenges. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Lamers, M.H. and W.v. Eck, Why simulate? hybrid biological-digital games, in Proceedings of the 2012t European conference on Applications of Evolutionary Computation.(2012), Springer-Verlag: Málaga, Spain.214--223. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lenhart, A., J. Kahne, E. Middaugh, A.R. Macgill, C. Evans, and J. Vitak, Teens, Video Games, and Civics: Teens' Gaming Experiences Are Diverse and Include Significant Social Interaction and Civic Engagement. Pew Internet & American Life Project, (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Littleford, R.A., Culture of Protozoa in the Classroom. The American Biology Teacher, 22, 9 (1960), 551--559.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Mertens, M. and T.O. Meißner, Wir waren Space Invaders: Geschichten vom Computerspielen. 2006: Katrin Blumenkamp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ozasa, K., J. Lee, S. Song, M. Hara, and M. Maeda, Two-dimensional optical feedback control of Euglena confined in closed-type microfluidic channels. Lab on a Chip, 11, 11 (2011), 1933--1940.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ozasa, K., J. Lee, S. Song, M. Hara, and M. Maeda, Euglena-based neurocomputing with two-dimensional optical feedback on swimming cells in microaquariums. Applied Soft Computing, 13, 1 (2013), 527538. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Papert, S., Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. 1980: Basic Books, Inc. 244. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Parkes, A. and C. Dickie, A biological imperative for interaction design, in CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems.(2013), ACM: Paris, France.2209--2218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Pivec, M., Editorial: Play and learn: potentials of gamebased learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 3 (2007), 387--393.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Preece, J., Y. Rogers, H. Sharp, D. Benyon, S. Holland, and T. Carey, Human-Computer Interaction. 1994: Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd. 775. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Prensky, M., Computer games and learning: Digital game-based learning. Handbook of computer game studies, 18, (2005), 97--122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Ramey-Gassert, L., H.J. Walberg, and H.J. Walberg, Reexamining connections: Museums as science learning environments. Science Education, 78, 4 (1994), 345363.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Reas, C. and B. Fry, Processing: programming for the media arts. AI & SOCIETY, 20, 4 (2006), 526--538. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Rein, M.L. and J.M. Deussing, The optogenetic (r) evolution. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 287, 2 (2012), 95--109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Riedel-Kruse, I.H., A.M. Chung, B. Dura, A.L. Hamilton, and B.C. Lee, Design, engineering and utility of biotic games. Lab on a Chip, 11, 1 (2011), 14--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Salen, K. and E. Zimmerman, Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. 2004: MIT press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Schweingruber, H.A. and M. Fenichel, Surrounded by Science:: Learning Science in Informal Environments. 2010: National Academies Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Sellers, J., Arcade fever: the fan's guide to the golden age of video games. 2001: Running Press Book Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Stage, E.K., H. Asturias, T. Cheuk, P.A. Daro, and S.B. Hampton, Opportunities and Challenges in Next Generation Standards. Science, 340, 6130 (2013), 276277.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. van Eck, W. and M.H. Lamers, Hybrid BiologicalDigital Systems in Artistic and Entertainment Computing. Leonardo, 46, 2 (2013), 151--158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Wessnitzer, J., A. Asthenidis, G. Petrou, and B. Webb, A cricket-controlled robot orienting towards a sound source, in Proceedings of the 12th Annual conference on Towards autonomous robotic systems.(2011), Springer-Verlag: Sheffield, UK.1--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Whitesides, G.M., The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature, 442, 7101 (2006), 368--373.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Wolken, J.J., Euglena: The Photoreceptor System for Phototaxis*. The Journal of Protozoology, 24, 4 (1977), 518--522.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Tangible Interactive Microbiology for Informal Science Education

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          TEI '15: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
          January 2015
          766 pages
          ISBN:9781450333054
          DOI:10.1145/2677199

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 15 January 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          TEI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate63of222submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader