skip to main content
10.1145/2677199.2680569acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Resonant Bits: Harmonic Interaction with Virtual Pendulums

Published:15 January 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents the concept of Resonant Bits, an interaction technique for encouraging engaging, slow and skilful interaction with tangible, mobile and ubiquitous devices. The technique is based on the resonant excitation of harmonic oscillators and allows the exploration of a number of novel types of tangible interaction including: ideomotor control, where subliminal micro-movements accumulate over time to produce a visible outcome; indirect tangible interaction, where a number of devices can be controlled simultaneously through an intermediary object such as a table; and slow interaction, with meditative and repetitive gestures being used for control. The Resonant Bits concept is tested as an interaction method in a study where participants resonate with virtual pendulums on a mobile device. The Harmonic Tuner, a resonance-based music player, is presented as a simple example of using resonant bits. Overall, our ambition in proposing the Resonant Bits concept is to promote skilful, engaging and ultimately rewarding forms of interaction with tangible devices that takes time and patience to learn and master.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

tei0165.mov

mov

100.6 MB

p49.mp4

mp4

108.5 MB

References

  1. Csikszentmihalyi, M., and Csikzentmihaly, M. Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Djajadiningrat, T., Matthews, B., and Stienstra, M. Easy doesn't do it: Skill and expression in tangible aesthetics. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Djajadiningrat, T., Wensveen, S., Frens, J., and Overbeeke, K. Tangible products: Redressing the balance between appearance and action. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Fekete, J.-D., Elmqvist, N., and Guiard, Y. Motion-pointing: Target selection using elliptical motions. In Proc. of CHI (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hallnás, L., and Redström, J. Slow technology -- designing for reflections. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 5 (2001), 201--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hummels, C. Searching for salient aspects of resonant interaction. Knowledge, Technology & Policy 20 (2007), 19--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hummels, C., and van der Helm, A. ISH and the search for resonant tangible interaction. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 8 (2004), 385--388. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ishii, H. Bottles: A transparent interface as a tribute to Mark Weiser. IEICE Trans. Inf. & Syst. (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ishii, H., and Ullmer, B. Tangible bits: Towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In Proc. of CHI (1997). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Knuf, L., Aschersleben, G., and Prinz, W. An analysis of ideomotor action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130, 4 (2001), 779.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Lemaitre, G., Houix, O., Visell, Y., Franinovi, K., Misdariis, N., and Susini, P. Toward the design and evaluation of continuous sound in tangible interfaces: The spinotron. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67 (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Marshall, J., Benford, S., and Pridmore, T. Deception and magic in collaborative interaction. In Proc. of CHI (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Svanaes, D., and Verplank, W. In search of metaphors for tangible user intefaces. In Proc. of DARE (2000). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Wensveen, S. A. G., Djajadiningrat, J. P., and Overbeeke, C. J. Interaction frogger: A design framework to couple action and function through feedback and feedforward. In Proc. of DIS (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Williamson, J. Continuous Uncertain Interaction. PhD thesis, University of Glasgow, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Williamson, J., Murray-Smith, R., and Hughes, S. Shoogle: excitatory multimodal interaction on mobile devices. In Proc. of CHI (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Resonant Bits: Harmonic Interaction with Virtual Pendulums

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      TEI '15: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
      January 2015
      766 pages
      ISBN:9781450333054
      DOI:10.1145/2677199

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 January 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      TEI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate63of222submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader