skip to main content
10.1145/2700171.2791045acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Long-Term Study of a Crowdfunding Platform: Predicting Project Success and Fundraising Amount

Published:24 August 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Crowdfunding platforms have become important sites where people can create projects to seek funds toward turning their ideas into products, and back someone else's projects. As news media have reported successfully funded projects (e.g., Pebble Time, Coolest Cooler), more people have joined crowdfunding platforms and launched projects. But in spite of rapid growth of the number of users and projects, a project success rate at large has been decreasing because of launching projects without enough preparation and experience. To solve the problem, in this paper we (i) collect the largest datasets from Kickstarter, consisting of all project profiles, corresponding user profiles, projects' temporal data and users' social media information; (ii) analyze characteristics of successful projects, behaviors of users and understand dynamics of the crowdfunding platform; (iii) propose novel statistical approaches to predict whether a project will be successful and a range of expected pledged money of the project; and (iv) develop predictive models and evaluate performance of the models. Our experimental results show that the predictive models can effectively predict project success and a range of expected pledged money.

References

  1. N-Gram-Based Text Categorization, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jumpstart our business startups act. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr3606enr/pdf/BILLS-112hr3606enr.pdf, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. What Motivates People to Invest in Crowdfunding Projects? Recommendation using Heterogeneous Traits in Kickstarter, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexa. kickstarter.com site overview - alexa. http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/kickstarter.com, March 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. P. Belleflamme, T. Lambert, and A. Schwienbacher. Crowdfunding: Tapping the Right Crowd. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Economist. The new thundering herd. http://www.economist.com/node/21556973, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. V. Etter, M. Grossglauser, and P. Thiran. Launch hard or go home!: Predicting the success of kickstarter campaigns. In COSN, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. E. M. Gerber and J. Hui. Crowdfunding: Motivations and deterrents for participation. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 20(6), Dec. 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. E. M. Gerber, J. S. Hui, and P.-Y. Kuo. Crowdfunding: Why people are motivated to post and fund projects on crowdfunding platforms. In CSCW, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. D. Greenberg, B. Pardo, K. Hariharan, and E. Gerber. Crowdfunding support tools: Predicting success & failure. In CHI Extended Abstracts, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Hall, E. Frank, G. Holmes, B. Pfahringer, P. Reutemann, and I. H. Witten. The weka data mining software: An update. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 11(1):10--18, Nov. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. S. Hui, M. D. Greenberg, and E. M. Gerber. Understanding the role of community in crowdfunding work. In CSCW, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. V. Kuppuswamy and B. L. Bayus. Crowdfunding Creative Ideas: The Dynamics of Project Backers in Kickstarter. Social Science Research Network Working Paper Series, Mar. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. K. Lee, J. Caverlee, and S. Webb. Uncovering social spammers: Social honeypots achine learning. In SIGIR, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. C.-T. Lu, S. Xie, X. Kong, and P. S. Yu. Inferring the impacts of social media on crowdfunding. In WSDM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. B. Mariòo, R. E. Banchs, J. M. Crego, A. de Gispert, P. Lambert, J. A. R. Fonollosa, and M. R. Costa-jussà. N-gram-based machine translation. Comput. Linguist., 32(4):527--549, Dec. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. H. G. McLaughlin. SMOG grading - a new readability formula. Journal of Reading, pages 639--646, May 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. T. Mitra and E. Gilbert. The language that gets people to give: Phrases that predict success on kickstarter. In CSCW, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. E. Mollick. The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1):1--16, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. J. Pennebaker, M. Francis, and R. Booth. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Erlbaum Publishers, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. A. E. Roth, J. K. Murnighan, and F. Schoumaker. The deadline effect in bargaining: Some experimental evidence. The American Economic Review, pages 806--823, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. A. Xu, X. Yang, H. Rao, W.-T. Fu, S.-W. Huang, and B. P. Bailey. Show me the money!: An analysis of project updates during crowdfunding campaigns. In CHI, pages 591--600. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Y. Yang and J. O. Pedersen. A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. In ICML, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. M. Yildiz. Optimism, deadline effect, and stochastic deadlines. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. N. Zipkin. The 10 most funded kickstarter campaigns ever. http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/235313, March 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Long-Term Study of a Crowdfunding Platform: Predicting Project Success and Fundraising Amount

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        HT '15: Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Hypertext & Social Media
        August 2015
        360 pages
        ISBN:9781450333955
        DOI:10.1145/2700171

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 24 August 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        HT '15 Paper Acceptance Rate24of60submissions,40%Overall Acceptance Rate378of1,158submissions,33%

        Upcoming Conference

        HT '24
        35th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
        September 10 - 13, 2024
        Poznan , Poland

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader