skip to main content
10.1145/2700648.2809846acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring the Opportunities and Challenges with Exercise Technologies for People who are Blind or Low-Vision

Published:26 October 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

People who are blind or low-vision may have a harder time participating in exercise due to inaccessibility or lack of experience. We employed Value Sensitive Design (VSD) to explore the potential of technology to enhance exercise for people who are blind or low-vision. We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews about exercise and technology with 10 people who are blind or low-vision and 10 people who facilitate fitness for people who are blind or low-vision. We also conducted a survey with 76 people to learn about outsider perceptions of hypothetical exercise with people who are blind or low-vision. Based on our interviews and survey, we found opportunities for technology development in four areas: 1) mainstream exercise classes, 2) exercise with sighted guides, 3) rigorous outdoors activity, and 4) navigation of exercise spaces. Design considerations should include when and how to deliver auditory or haptic information based on exercise and context, and whether it is acceptable to develop less mainstream technologies if they enhance mainstream exercise. The findings of this work seek to inform the design of accessible exercise technologies.

References

  1. Iñaki M. Albaina, Thomas Visser, Charles A.P.G. van der Mast, Martijn H. Vastenburg. 2009. Flowie: A per-suasive virtual coach to motivate elderly individuals to walk. In Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. 3rd International Conference on Pervasive Health (PervasiveHealth '09), 1--7. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth2009.5949Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Shiri Azenkot, Sanjana Prasain, Alan Borning, Emily Fortuna, Richard E. Ladner, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2011. Enhancing independence and safety for blind and deaf-blind public transit riders. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), 3247--3256. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1979424 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Shiri Azenkot, Kyle Rector, Richard Ladner, and Jacob Wobbrock. 2012. PassChords: secure multi-touch au-thentication for blind people. In Proceedings of the 14th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Comput-ers and accessibility (ASSETS '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 159--166. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2384916.2384945 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Elaine Biddiss and Jennifer Irwin. 2010. Active video games to promote physical activity in children and youth: a systematic review. Archives of pediatrics & ad-olescent medicine 164, 7: 664--672. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.104Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Alan Borning, Batya Friedman, Janet Davis, and Peyina Lin. 2005. Informing public deliberation: Value sensitive design of indicators for a large-scale urban simula-tion. In Proceedings of the 2005 Ninth European Con-ference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW '05), 449--468. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1--4020--4023--7_23 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Alper Bozkurt, David L. Roberts, Barbara L. Sherman, Rita Brugarolas, Sean Mealin, John Majikes, Pu Yang, and Robert Loftin. 2014. Toward Cyber-Enhanced Working Dogs for Search and Rescue. IEEE Intelligent Systems 29, 6: 32--37. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mis.2014.77Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. CABI. 2012. Welcome to the Cricket Association for the Blind in India (CABI) | Cricket Association for the Blind in India. Retrieved May 4, 2015 from http://www.blindcricket.in/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Canadian Blind Sports Association. 2012. Canadian Blind Sports. Retrieved May 4, 2015 from http://canadianblindsports.ca/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Michele Capella-McDonnall. 2007. The need for health promotion for adults who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 101, 3: 133--145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Robert Cercos and Florian 'Floyd' Mueller. 2013. Watch your steps: designing a semi-public display to promote physical activity. In Proceedings of The 9th Australa-sian Conference on Interactive Entertainment: Matters of Life and Death (IE '13), Article 2, 6 pages. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2513002.2513016 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Sunny Consolvo, David W. McDonald, and James A. Landay. 2009. Theory-driven design strategies for tech-nologies that support behavior change in everyday life. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09), 405--414. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1518766 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Courage Canada. 2015. Courage Canada Hockey for the Blind. Retrieved May 4, 2015 from http://www.couragecanada.ca/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Brad Crawford. 2015. A Blind Runner and His Amazing Guide Dog. Retrieved July 7, 2015 from http://thebark.com/content/blind-runner-and-his-amazing-guide-dogGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Chloe Fan, Jodi Forlizzi, and Anind Dey. 2012. Consid-erations for technology that support physical activity by older adults. In Proceedings of the 14th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and acces-sibility (ASSETS '12), 33--40. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2384916.2384923 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Fitbit. 2015. Fitbit Official Site for Activity Trackers & More. Retrieved May 4, 2015 from http://www.fitbit.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Batya Friedman, Peter H. Kahn Jr., and Alan Borning. 2013. Value Sensitive Design and information systems. In Ping Zhang and Dennis Galletta (eds.), Human-computer interaction in management information systems: Foundations, Springer Netherlands, 55--95. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978--94-007--7844--3_4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Nicholas A. Giudice and Gordon E. Legge. 2008. Blind Navigation and the Role of Technology. In A. Helal, M. Mokhtari & B. Abdulrazak (eds.), Engineering hand-book of smart technology for aging, disability, and in-dependence, John Wiley & Sons, 479--500. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470379424.ch25Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Barney G. Glaser, and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine Transaction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Greg Guest, Arwen Bunce, and Laura Johnson. 2006. How many interviews are enough-- An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods 18, 1: 59--82. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1525822x05279903Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Francis Iannacci, Erik Turnquist, Daniel Avrahami, and Shwetak N. Patel. 2011. The haptic laser: multi-sensation tactile feedback for at-a-distance physical space perception and interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), 2047--2050. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1979239 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Melody Moore Jackson, Clint Zeagler, Giancarlo Valen-tin, Alex Martin, Vincent Martin, Adil Delawalla, Wen-dy Blount, Sarah Eiring, Ryan Hollis, Yash Kshirsagar, and Thad Starner. 2013. FIDO - facilitating interactions for dogs with occupations: wearable dog-activated inter-faces. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Sympo-sium on Wearable Computers (ISWC '13), 81--88. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2493988.2494334 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Shaun K. Kane, Chandrika Jayant, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Richard E. Ladner. 2009. Freedom to roam: a study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities. In Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (Assets '09), 115--122. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1639642.163966 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lauren J. Lieberman, Barbara L. Robinson, and Heidi Rollheiser. 2006. Youth with visual impairments: Expe-riences in general physical education. Re: view 38, 1: 35--48. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/revu.38.1.35--48Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Matthew Mauriello, Michael Gubbels, and Jon E. Froeh-lich. 2014. Social fabric fitness: the design and evalua-tion of wearable E-textile displays to support group run-ning. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Hu-man Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 2833--2842. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2556288.2557299 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Lauren R. Milne, Cynthia L. Bennett, and Richard E. Ladner. 2014. The Accessibility of Mobile Health Sen-sors for Blind Users. In 29th Annual International & Persons with Disabilities Conference (CSUN '14).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Anthony Morelli. 2010. Haptic/audio based exergaming for visually impaired individuals. SIGACCESS Access. Comput. 96 (January 2010), 50--53. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1731849.1731859 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Tony Morelli, John Foley, Luis Columna, Lauren Lieberman, and Eelke Folmer. 2010. VI-Tennis: a vi-brotactile/audio exergame for players who are visually impaired. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Con-ference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG '10), 147--154. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1822348.1822368 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Tony Morelli, John Foley, and Eelke Folmer. 2010. Vi-bowling: a tactile spatial exergame for individuals with visual impairments. In Proceedings of the 12th interna-tional ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (ASSETS '10), 179--186. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1878803.1878836 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Tony Morelli, John Foley, Lauren Lieberman, and Eelke Folmer. 2011. Pet-N-Punch: upper body tactile/audio exergame to engage children with visual impairments into physical activity. In Proceedings of Graphics Inter-face 2011 (GI '11), 223--230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Tony Morelli, and Eelke Folmer. 2014. Real-time senso-ry substitution to enable players who are blind to play video games using whole body gestures. Entertainment Computing 5, 1: 83--90. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2013.08.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Nike, Inc. 2015. Choose Your Nike+ App. Nike.com. Retrieved May 4, 2015 from http://www.nike.com/us/en_us/c/nikeplus-fuelGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Phys.org. 2015. Blind French hikers cross mountains with special GPS. Retrieved July 8, 2015 from http://phys.org/news/2015-07-french-hikers-mountains-special-gps.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Jules Pretty, Jo Peacock, Martin Sellens, and Murray Griffin. 2005. The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise. International Journal of Environmen-tal Health Research, 15, 5: 319--337. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09603120500155963Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Kyle Rector, Cynthia L. Bennett, and Julie A. Kientz. 2013. Eyes-free yoga: an exergame using depth cameras for blind & low vision exercise. In Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '13), Article 12, 8 pages. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2513383.2513392 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. James H. Rimmer. 2006. Building Inclusive Activity Communities for People with Vision Loss. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 100, suppl, 863--865.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Barbara L. Robinson, and Lauren J. Lieberman. 2004. Effects of visual impairment, gender, and age on self-determination. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blind-ness, 98, 6: 351--366.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Victoria Schwanda, Steven Ibara, Lindsay Reynolds, and Dan Cosley. 2011. Side effects and "gateway" tools: advocating a broader look at evaluating persuasive sys-tems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), 345--348. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1978991 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Ski for Light. 2015. Ski for Light, Inc.® Retrieved May 4, 2015 from http://sfl.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Kristen Shinohara and Josh Tenenberg. 2007. Observing Sara: a case study of a blind person's interactions with technology. In Proceedings of the 9th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and acces-sibility (Assets '07), 171--178. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1296843.1296873 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2011. In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Con-ference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 705--714. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1979044 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. The United States Association of Blind Athletes. 2015. Sports Adaptations. Retrieved May 4, 2015 from http://usaba.org/index.php/sports/sports-adaptations/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Moira E. Stuart, Lauren Lieberman, and Karen E. Hand. 2006. Beliefs about physical activity among children who are visually impaired and their parents. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 100, 4: 223--234.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. The United States Association of Blind Athletes. 2015. The United States Association of Blind Athletes. Re-trieved May 4, 2015 from http://usaba.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Evette Weil, Melissa Wachterman, Ellen P. McCarthy, Roger B. Davis, Bonnie O'Day, Lisa I. Iezzoni, and Christina C. Wee. 2002. Obesity among adults with dis-abling conditions. Journal of the American Medical As-sociation, 288, 10: 1265--1268. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.10.1265Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Joseph P. Winnick. 2011. Adapted physical education and sport. Human Kinectics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Fahri Yetim. 2011. Bringing discourse ethics to value sensitive design: pathways toward a deliberative future. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 3, 2: 133--155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Exploring the Opportunities and Challenges with Exercise Technologies for People who are Blind or Low-Vision

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ASSETS '15: Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility
          October 2015
          466 pages
          ISBN:9781450334006
          DOI:10.1145/2700648

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 26 October 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          ASSETS '15 Paper Acceptance Rate30of127submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader